In the UK Christians are not allowed to offer prayer in a hospital to the sick, on airlines wearing
a Christian symbol of a cross is not allowed, Christian teaching in school must not be taught as the only truth, and a blind eye is turned to extreme religious life styles.
The cases of Shirley Chaplin and Nadia Eweida, on the other hand, involved the NHS and British Airways respectively and centred upon employees being refused permission to wear
the Christian symbol of the cross.
Not exact matches
Though crucifixion on this
cross only means physical death, not spiritual.The ankh was a
symbol, not
of death, but
of life, and it is the ankh that was used by all
Christians until the 4th century when the Vatican introduced the Roman
cross for the first time.
To a
Christian, the
cross is a
symbol of death.
Sorry, but a
cross is a
cross, and you may say it is historical and, yes, it is - it is the historical
symbol of Christianity, and many people killed in 9/11 were not
Christian.
Will the new
Christian Right
Cross have a right turn at the extremities
of the
cross, or will the
symbol include the
cross aflame?
Premier Markus Soder said
crosses should not be seen as religious
symbols but as a «clear avowal
of our Bavarian identity and
Christian values».
Seeing them together in their robes — large jeweled pectoral
crosses, long ebony shepherd staffs in hand, the golden double - eagled
symbol of Byzantium topping each staff — one was reminded
of the civilization that shaped the
Christian East for 1,000 years.
I know the
cross is symbolic
of the
Christian faith and it's very presence is a
symbol of hate.
The
Christian symbols that speak to those realities
of negation —
cross, apocalyptic, sin, the demonic, the radically incomprehensible, the hidden and revealed God — strike home to me today far more than they ever did before.
The
cross is rightly the eternal
symbol and focus
of the
Christian faith.
It appears to me that
Christians who continue to use these
symbols in Muslim contexts have not yet internalized the meaning and the purpose
of the
cross.
He only conceded the use
of a simple
cross as a
Christian symbol.
Bishop Donald (pictured below) declined to comment specifically on the case but told Premier: «It hurts me deeply as a
Christian if the name
of the Lord Jesus is abused or taken in vain or
Christian symbols such as the
cross.
Put a peace
symbol, but not a
cross that will leave people who died inside the towers and who were not
Christians out
of the story.
As was mentioned in the article, a
cross is a
symbol of Christianity, but
Christians aren't the only people who died on 9/11.
The
cross has become a universally accepted
symbol of death and mourning even in mostly non
christian countries.
Christians have used the
cross for centuries as the
symbol of their religion.
The
cross is a
symbol of one religion, for one group
of people, who is trying to relabel all the victim as
christian.
For the
Christian community, the
cross is the supreme
symbol, for in his self - sacrifice Christ pointed beyond himself and surrendered the particular to the ultimate; the
cross was the manifestation
of God's participation in man's existence, universally present but not universally recognized.31 Tillich's own background in the Lutheran Church and his sensitivity to Luther's experience
of guilt, forgiveness, personal faith and divine grace, are reflected at many points in his writings, especially in his sermons.32
Because Jesus died by crucifixion, the
cross became the chief
symbol of Christianity, and the heart
of Christian proclamation.
For most
Christians, the primary
symbol of God's love and care for humanity is a
cross — a reminder
of the crucifixion.
Forget about the
cross being a
Christian symbol, and why don't you just view it for what it is — one man's message
of hope, love and compassion to the victims and their loved ones.
The
cross is a
symbol of hope and new life to
Christians, which is what we all wish upon the victims» families, friends, and those who were present that night.
I disagree with Voice
of Reason, To me, the
cross is still very much a
Christian symbol, as Christmas is a
Christian holiday.
Because for
Christians, a
cross is a
symbol of redemption, resurrection and hope.
The death
of Jesus is portrayed in
Christian faith and hope as an act
of life, as an affirmation
of life in the face
of death, and the
cross of Jesus are
symbols not
of death, but
of an unquenchable and invincible life that this world can neither give nor take away from us.
However, offering slang and fashionable jargon as «renewed» preaching, celebrating the secular embrace
of certain
Christian symbols (i.e., use
of crosses as warnings at highway danger points, putting Christ in Christmas, etc.), or reducing the Gospel to the lowest common denominator
of acceptable faith and ethic will hardly be received by a serious world as adequate penance.
It's kind
of funny because Italy is one
of the few predominantly
Christian countries without a
symbol of the
cross on their flag and they're doing this.
Christian arguments for the
cross to be displayed 24/7 in a public classroom as a constant reminder every second
of the day that Jesus was murdered by Jews and died for our sins won't hold up to
Christian review if all other religious
symbols were placed right next to it.
if it was a
symbol of the cresent moon rather then the
cross you nutter
christians would be all over it and you know it.
With an artistic rendering
of a Jesus figure hanging on that
cross, it then becomes a
symbol of a
Christian religious principle, to wit; he died for your sins.
David G. Roskie's compelling study Against the Apocalypse: Responses to Catastrophe in Modem Jewish Culture discusses the
cross symbol's use not only in Chagall's painting, but in the literary work
of Der Nister, Lamed Shapiro, Sholem Asch, S. Y. Agnon and the poet Uri Zvi Greenberg (Harvard University Press, 1984 [pp. 258 - 310]-RRB- In literature written before World War II (and under the influence
of biblical criticism that had emancipated Jesus» image from its doctrinal
Christian vesture), these authors used the
cross symbol variously; for Asch, the crucified figure in all his Jewishness symbolized universal suffering; for Shapiro and Agnon, on the other hand, the
cross remained an emblem
of violence and a reminder
of Christian enmity against Jews.
The group defends churches whose
crosses have been forcibly removed amid a government campaign to strip skylines
of Christian symbols.
It was the most barbaric and horrible way to die in those days, yet
Christians made the
cross the
symbol of their movement from the very beginning.
The most well known
of all
Christian symbols, the
cross has for centuries marked the graves
of Christians, perched high on steeples, inspired soldiers to wage holy war, or rested silently on altars between two candles.
Then to ascribe motive and meaning to
symbols and icons
Christians use to remind us
of His willing sacrifice which are canards and obfuscations, or at best linking them to darker events from history is not even a legitimate response to the
cross itself.
In many historically
Christian countries, the buns are traditionally eaten on Good Friday, with the
cross standing as a
symbol of the crucifixion.
The policy recognizes that it is not practical for some religious
symbols — such as turbans and hijabs — to be worn underneath the uniform; wearing the
cross is not a necessary observance
of the
Christian faith.
The court ultimately held that schools must not proselytize on behalf
of a particular religious doctrine and that the display
of crosses in the classroom exceeded the constitutionally established limits on freedom
of religion, as the crucifix is a core
symbol of the
Christian faith and was being displayed in a public school where attendance is mandatory.