Sentences with phrase «christianity does»

The foundation of Christianity doesn't rest on the doctrine of biblical inerrancy.

And this in spite of the actual fact that the popular Christianity does absolutely nothing, or did nothing until mind - cure came to the rescue.

Christianity does not have a monopoly on the word «marriage».

And later in his reply, Father Neuhaus sounds remarkably Miltonian when he says that «Christianity does propose a unified conception of life, but that unified conception of life comprehends and makes possible the pluralistic character of life as we experience it,» which among other things neatly summarizes the argument of Milton's Areopagitica.

Just because a story reflects poorly about Christianity does not mean there is systematic, institutional bias away from your favorite religion.

The point is that Christianity does have a specific and particular content.

Stackhouse is clear that Christianity does not «involve any specific orthopraxy [right action] at all» (184).

Nonetheless, a Christian trying to place himself in the shoes of his Jewish friends, at least as our experience in America allows us to do so, can dimly begin to imagine why, to a Jew, Christianity does not seem like a religion of the true Messiah awaited by Judaism for so many ages.

Christianity does not displace Judaism; on the contrary, it needs a vital and living Judaism, in the concrete world of history, in order to help it to understand its own inheritance.

A) Christianity does NOT teach abstience, I dare anyone to look through the bible for it.

Geniune Christianity doesn't support bloodshed, wiping out of indigenous nations, aggressive war, etc...

Christianity doesn't hold a monopoly on morality and it could be argued that in certain instances the Bible gets it wrong.

Franklin should be investigated for fraud, pretending to be something he is not (that's a christian) Stealing people's money in the name of christianity does not make you a christian....

The Catechism, Tradition and Scripture all make it clear that authentic Christianity does involve believing that certain things are objectively true.

Orthodox Christianity doesn't accept the overwhelmingly consistent biblical teaching that the prophesied Messiah is fully a human being.

Congar once remarked that Christianity does not begin every time from zero.5 One can hardly dispute the truth of such a statement.

Zeckle asked: In Christianity, we have various views on women and their roles in society and faith — ranging from a very hierarchical, patriarchal view to egalitarian; does Islam have a wide range of views of women as Christianity does?

Pastor Andy Stanley summarized this point when he said: «Christianity does not exist because of the Bible any more than you exist because of your birth certificate.

Christianity does not exist because of the Bible any more than you exist because of your birth certificate.

A rejection of the supernatural elements of Christianity does not require a rejection of its morality.

Pointing out which companies that have founded some of their practices on Christianity doesn't mean that anyone at CNN hates Christianity.

What Christianity does is not to supply a man with an excuse comfortably to live the old life; it supplies him with a dynamic for the new life.

Point is Christianity does not have a monopoly on morality and good behavior.

Since much of Christianity does not jibe with secular liberation, some of it is compelled to conform.

If Christianity does not appeal to you, then so be it.

(There are a couple of passages in the NT that imply that where Christianity does not hold political power, it does not survive, but where it does survive, it no longer adheres to the teachings of Jesus.)

Christianity doesn't present any evidence that it is all that different from any other religion, except that it had the power of the Roman Empire behind it.

Christianity doesn't fit with me.

Christianity does not have a monopoly on religious experiences.

Christianity does not promote pain, they have helped others avoid; preaching on heaven has helped many avoid hell's pain; the compassion of Christianity has only promoted the well - being of others so hospitals were started to aid the sick!

Nowhere in his discussion of ancient Israel or early Christianity does Greenberg deal with theological interpretations of scripture in those traditions.

Mind - cure, theosophy, stoicism, ordinary neurological hygiene, insist on it as emphatically as Christianity does, and it is capable of entering into closest marriage with every speculative creed.

Theism is belief in a god, thus Christianity does not stand alone.

In this aspect of alienness, Christianity does not fundamentally differ from other religious traditions — after all, Christianity is one religion among others, so this should neither surprise nor trouble Christians.

There is no mention of the word marriage in that scripture and in fact marriage was around long before christianity was, so christianity does not get to take ownership of this.

In this sense, Christianity doesn't have a moral system, one that can prepare individuals to determine what the moral choice is for themselves.

Any singularity we may find in Christianity does not necessarily imply «superiority» to other faiths.

Now listen, Christianity does not ever demand that kind of faith.

You are right... Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian but he was a Muslim... now the word Muslim means: submit to The Creator and not having any sort of media to get to The Creator... which Christianity does keep a media... so we could say Christianity have gone away from the Abrahamic Religion and so the Jews...

Regarding other cultures, I am not aware of any other cultures that have knowledge or scriptural «continuity» going back to the beginning like, say, Christianity does.

Christianity does more than merely evoke another world; the Christian, albeit with faltering footsteps, attempts to walk in the Kingdom of God, a world we live in now as we try to do the king's will.

Yes, Christianity doesn't really play well with others since it is built into the theology (at least parts of it like John) that only Christians get to go to heaven.

For, in the meantime, there has emerged a secularism which claims to represent the same high moral ideals that Christianity does, but without dependence upon the religious beliefs which are characteristic of the church.

Imperative Christianity does not ask whether the love of neighbor will bring forth a society in which all men will love their neighbors; it acts in hope, to be sure, but love and justice are its immediate commands and not its far - off goals.

Christianity does well to celebrate personal particularity, but the often promiscuous leveling of democracy and the techno - impersonality of both bureaucratization and mechanization erode the institutional contexts in which it's possible to find authentic personal significance.

And Christianity does not have a monopoly on altruism or compassion.

When everyone is Christian, Christianity does not exist.

If we're going to be silly and suggest that Christianity does NOT have to talk about «Incarnation» and «Trinity» in order to be Christian, then it stands to reason that ecumenical Church history, the creeds and confessions, the Fathers, mean diddly squat in defining what «Christianity» is.

Christianity does not teach a naive vision of life with a fairy tale God, despite the caricature of faith promoted by some atheists.

Unlike the pagan religions of classical antiquity, e.g. ancient Egypt and the Far East, Christianity does not seek to explain the physical phenomena of the material world as a dramatic struggle between warring gods and goddesses, i.e. μυθος (myth).