To sustain the very meaning of virtue and sin, must
Christians change sides and take up the cause of worldly honor and shame?
Not exact matches
I do nt understand why the syrian
christians are so relcutant to drop their existing secular goverment rule, that lets them worship in peace for a new democratic
change called Muslim Brotherhood whos opposition is fighting along
side saudi wahabists and al qaeda
You «
christians» talk out of both
sides of your face, say one thing, do another,
change your stances when it's convenient, so yeah, I consider you more dangerous.
The evidence for this phenomenon is incontestable: the influx of non «SBC evangelical scholars into Baptist seminaries; the
changing of the name of the Baptist Sunday School Board to the more generic LifeWay
Christian Resources; the presence and high profile of non «Baptist leaders on SBC platforms, e.g., the closing message at the 1998 SBC delivered by Dr. James Dobson, a Nazarene; the aggressive participation of the SBC's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission as an advocate for the conservative
side of the culture wars conflict; new patterns of cooperation between SBC mission boards and evangelical ministries such as Promise Keepers, Campus Crusade for Christ, the National Association of Evangelicals, Prison Fellowship, and World Vision.
Looking at this
side of the ambiguity, we see a church in which many first - world
Christians of our day could feel comfortable and undisturbed: a church that lives without question or resistance in a state founded on violence and made prosperous by the exploitation of less fortunate nations; a church that accepts various perquisites from that state as its due; a church where
changing jobs for the sake of peace and justice is seldom considered; a church that constantly speaks in the language of war; a church given to eloquent invective in its internal disputes and against outside opponents; a church quite sure that God will punish the wicked.
'' - If someone upon investigation of the two
sides of the issue determines that they do nt personally believe one or both was part of the original text, removing them does not
change Christian doctrine one iota.»
The
Christians say, «The whales could just swim along
side the ark» but that much excess water (that supposedly flooded the earth) would have
changed the salinity levels in the oceans and the whales would have died.
There has also been a one -
sided emphasis on sin — an emphasis that has led many
Christians to believe that, though existing conditions may be bad, a
change would probably be worse.
Graham's visits to Hungary and Poland
changed his emphasis in regard to the communist nations, and he states in a public letter in the Other
Side (January 1981): «It is out of a deepening sense of
Christian responsibility, therefore, that I have sought after my visit to Hungary in 1977 to make whatever contribution I can to building bridges of understanding and peace....
International development charity
Christian Aid is calling on world leaders at this week's G20 meeting to show the US President that he has relegated himself to the
side - lines of climate
change negotiations.
Changes in our gut flora may encourage or battle cancer, so we need to get a few trillion of our foot soldiers on
side, says
Christian Jobin