Not exact matches
Neither early
Christian nor modern scholar (nor modern publisher) will necessarily be actively dishonest, but simply bending
to the pressures their
world presents them and reading the evidence through the biases their situation provides them.
Three priorities
presented themselves
to Castro: (1) Since the
world is experiencing a resurgence in religion, and the decline of faith in modernity, the churches must resolve theological and philosophical questions: Is the Spirit exclusive, and the
Christian faith unique, or is the Spirit (he?
As
Christians watching horror, we are reminded through our belief in «Our Father» that, in the real
world, God is
present in our lives
to «deliver us from evil.»
Contending that the empire option dramatically compromises the gospel vision of peace, Nelson - Pallmeyer jettisons just - war theory and advocates reclaiming Jesus» radical model of nonviolence, He challenges
Christians to reject militarism and those aspects of their religious tradition that encourage or endorse violence, and he
presents nonviolent alternatives that refuse
to sanction violence as part of Cod's providential care of the
world.
At the same time I came
to realize that history
presents that aspect of the
world of our experience which, according
to Jewish and
Christian faith, reveals God's presence in his creation.
Similarly, people born into any given religious faith —
Christian, Muslim, Hindu, etc, etc, etc — and who are immersed in that faith, and surrounded by people of that faith, all of their lives — and especially their childhood — can't be expected
to suddenly cast off such total indoctrination when an atheist such as myself
presents them with certain facts which conflict with their
world view.
Richard L. Rubenstein has had a greater and more immediate impact upon the
world of
Christian theology than has been effected by any recent radical
Christian theologian, and doubtless this is true because, in the words of Langdon Gilkey, he
presents the sharpest and most devastating challenge
to the traditional or Biblical conception of God.
All this ought
to make us reconsider all the activist talk in the church, the supposed imperative that the church should go out
to meet the
world, the insistence that
Christians should stop
presenting to men the authoritative demand and commandment of God....
The factors of chief importance in the development of this theology were: (a) the Old Testament — and Judaism --(b) the tradition of religious thought in the Hellenistic
world, (c) the earliest
Christian experience of Christ and conviction about his person, mission, and nature — this soon became the tradition of the faith or the «true doctrine» — and (d) the living, continuous, ongoing experience of Christ — only in theory
to be distinguished from the preceding — in worship, in preaching, in teaching, in open proclamation and confession, as the manifestation of the
present Spiritual Christ within his church.
How is it possible at a time like the
present, when the whole
world is at war,
to sit down calmly and consider such a subject as the Earliest Gospel,
to study the evangelic tradition at the stage in which it first took literary form,
to discuss such fine points as the emergence of a particular theology in early Christianity or the transition from primitive
Christian messianism
to the normative doctrine of later creeds, confessions, hymns, and prayers?
This new cultural reality raises some anxieties, but it also
presents many of us with an opportunity
to rediscover
Christian witness in a
world that we do not control.
Christians will be sufficiently and completely
present in the
world if they suffer with those sufferers the one way of salvation, if they bear witness before Gods and man
to the consequences of injustice and the proclamation of love.
As far as the Church was concerned, it meant that the
Christian Bible could not be interpreted with the same guileless ease as a schools» elementary primer, containing over some six thousand years the history of the
world in detail
to the
present day.
The
Christian does not depart from the
world as it is, but he has a certain detachment in regard
to all
present things.
Lament as we may the vanished
world of Christendom, it is not
present to us, and we must also come
to recognize that with the erosion of Christendom we can no longer respond either interiorly or cognitively
to the classical forms of
Christian belief.
As long as
Christians seek
to present a strong and vital testimony of their faith, they must know that the
world of which they are a part is influenced by an atheistic climate.
If Christianity be rightly understood and if
Christians understand themselves correctly, things are exactly the opposite of what most
Christians and non-
Christians imagine: hope in the absolute future of God who is himself the eschatological salvation does not justify a fossilized conservatism which anxiously prefers the safe
present to an unknown future; it is not a tranquillizing «opium for the people» in
present sorrow; it is, on the contrary, the authoritative call
to an ever - renewed, confident exodus from the
present into the future, even in this
world.
One of the Yale ministers stated this point of view very well when he said: «Alcoholism is a sin only in the sense that it is a sin attributed
to society, especially a
Christian society — that we have been unable
to bring about a
world free from the tensions and conflicts of the
present day.
While the Jew awaits a Messiah of the future, the
Christian knows that the Messiah - Son of Man has come in Jesus Christ, that his coming was a real and decisive event, and that he will be
present with us even
to the coming of the end of the
world.
In my dialogues with Third
World Christians, I have sought
to use the creative aspects of the black
Christian eschatology in order
to help us
to see beyond what is
present to the future that is coming.
Given the
present climate in the Islamic
world, as already mentioned, interreligious conversation among Muslims,
Christians, and Jews is very difficult
to get going.
In the
present situation of unprecedented inequality within countries and in the
world,
to be baptized as a
Christian should be a call
to a counterculture,
to resistance
to the grave evils of capitalistic globalization.
I raise this question particularly with Pure Land Buddhists because the affirmation of other power, or what
Christians call grace, seems
to place a greater emphasis on the metaphysical character of the
world and human experience than is
present in other Buddhist traditions.
He called upon the Church
to «repent of the sins of existing society, cast off the spell of lies protecting our social wrongs, have faith in a higher social order, and realize in ourselves a new type of
Christian manhood which seems
to overcome the evil in the
present world, not by withdrawing from the
world, but by revolutionizing it.»
The divisions and even animosities are a cancer that is metastasizing within the body of Christ, obsessing us with diversions from his ministry and
presenting to the
world a negative image of
Christians.
The task of confronting the nonevangelical
world over the issue of Biblical authority is being undercut by the desire
to challenge fellow evangelicals» notions of inspiration What is distinctively evangelical needs again
to be forcefully
presented to the wider
Christian community.
This corrective also served the purpose of
presenting to the church a new understanding of itself and of the autonomous modern
world, and it reminded us what it means
to be a
Christian in the
world come of age.
Christian apologetics is a field of christian theology which aims to present a rational basis for the christian faith, defends the faith against objections and attempts to expose the flaws of other wor
Christian apologetics is a field of
christian theology which aims to present a rational basis for the christian faith, defends the faith against objections and attempts to expose the flaws of other wor
christian theology which aims
to present a rational basis for the
christian faith, defends the faith against objections and attempts to expose the flaws of other wor
christian faith, defends the faith against objections and attempts
to expose the flaws of other
world views.
This corrective also served the purpose of
presenting to the church a new understanding of itself and of autonomous modern
world, and it reminded us what it means
to be a
Christian in the
world come of age.»
American
Christians, I strongly suggest you
to read on the persecuted
Christians around the
world, both past and
present.
According
to Bultmann, any attempt at the
present time
to understand and express the
Christian message must realize that the theological propositions of the New Testament are not understood by modern man because they reflect a mythological picture of the
world that we today can not share.1
They are our authentic heritage from the Hebrew prophets, the Gospels and the early church (see, for example, Charles Avila's Ownership: Early
Christian Teaching [Orbis, 1983]; they are themes that were anticipated in part by developments in the papal «social encyclicals» from 1891
to the
present, and by the Vatican Council's 1965 pastoral constitution «The Church and the
World Today.»
I hope that the foregoing criticisms of Hauerwas regarding his seeming adherence
to a substantialist view of the self will be further clarified in the ensuing discussion of his understanding of the
Christian story, the relationship between the church and the
world, and the alternative process - relational view that is
presented.
Finally, I shall
present what I consider
to be a more adequate understanding of character and virtue, the
Christian story, and the relation between the church and the
world based on the conceptuality of process - relational thought.
Furthermore, a metaphysical outlook, being other - worldly, is unable
to show the modem
world a
Christian outlook which values the things of earth and sees the
world as in process of spiritual redemption and transformation and
presents salvation as taking place here on earth.
The last two chapters turn from theological analysis and biblical study
to the relations of these
to the individual
Christian and
to the message and the service of the churches in the
present world.
For the
present, however, the point is that the quality of the Spirit, and hence our criterion for knowing whether any given spirit is indeed
to be linked with the Spirit of God, is for
Christians the congruity which that spirit does, or does not, possess with what we have learned of God, God's character and purpose and manner of operation, through Jesus Christ in his revelation of the divine nature and agency in the
world.
I would suggest, however, that theology needs
to be more open
to various modes of the future than Dr. Altizer's system allows: both
to the impact of the future as
presented in a corpus of
Christian tradition under the theme of «hope,» and
to the future as it
presents itself
to our secular
world.
Let them blend new sciences and theories and the understanding of the most recent discoveries with
Christian morality and the teaching of
Christian doctrine, so that their religious culture and morality may keep pace with scientific knowledge and with the constantly progressing technology... Thus they will be able
to interpret and evaluate all things in a truly
Christian spirit,... and priests will be able
to present to our contemporaries the doctrine of the Church concerning God, man and the
world, in a manner more adapted
to them so that they may receive it more willingly.»
They were
presented with the challenge of directing their lives
to a
Christian faith that was vital for the whole
world.
The Ghana Assembly of the International Missionary Council, having reviewed the steady growth of the relationship of association between the International Missionary Council and the
World Council of Churches and having considered with care the opinions of delegates and those of the
Christian Councils whose views have been
presented, accepts in principle the integration of the two Councils, and desires further steps
to be taken towards this goal.
The foreword of the
present book includes a 1965 letter from Ramsey
to Fletcher: «[T] he candid issue between us is whether agape is expressed in acts only or in rules also, which question is generally begged; or else the structures in which human beings live are attributed
to other than uniquely
Christian sources of understanding (natural law, etc.) while
Christians go about pretending
to live in a
world without principles.
How are we
to live as rich
Christians in a
world that
presents us always with the poor?
Weak human nature will not let us believe in the promises of God with a confidence that purges from the soul the anguish of fear and unbelief, the Anfechtungen... Therefore, in Luther's discovery of justification the
Christian was liberated from the self - imposed requirement
to present a perfect mental attitude
to God,
to confuse belief with knowledge, faith with the direct intuition of an observed
world.
If the
Christian church has something helpful
to say
to the
present, complex economic
world, how can it put together needed words and ideas that are more than cliches?
God, as chief causative principle and as supreme affect, is «in this
world or he is nowhere»; biblical material, and in relation
to it
Christian liturgical and hymnological imagery, with the theological articulation of this, intend
to make affirmations which are
to be found in the pictures and forms and myths — and these we must seek
to make meaningful and valid for ourselves in our
present existence; man is an «embodied» and a social occasion or series (or «routing») of occasions, organic
to the
world of nature, and can only truly live as he lives in due recognition of these facts and sees them as integral
to himself.
From an analysis of attitudes towards
Christians in the ancient Roman
world comes the significant comment that» [w] hat others thought about Christianity was a factor in shaping how
Christians would think about themselves and how they would
present themselves
to the larger
world.»
In this way our churches can be, more clearly than they are at
present, part of the
world - wide
Christian community that never allows us
to forget the humanity of those beyond the barriers that limit our understanding.
All the people born before
Christian theology, and in areas in the
world were
Christian theology is not
present, by her logic are automatically going
to be lost.
The
Christian Yes
to Jesus» messiahship, which is based on believed and experienced reconciliation, will therefore accept the Jewish No, which is based on the experienced and suffered unredeemedness of the
world; and the Yes will insofar adopt the No as
to talk about the total and universal redemption of the
world only in the dimensions of a future hope and a
present contradiction of this unredeemed
world.