The trinity was a theological development from a series of councils in the first 400 years or so of
Church development of doctrine.
Not exact matches
♦ Eye
of the Tiber, Catholicism's answer to The Onion, has its own interpretation
of the Clintonista interest in «facilitating» the
development of Catholic
doctrine: «A new series
of emails released yesterday by WikiLeaks connected to its dump
of John Podesta's server show that ancestors
of presidential nominee Hillary Clinton attempted to sabotage the Catholic
Church by creating the Society
of Jesus hundreds
of years prior to her nomination.»
But whether the head
of the Standing Commission on Evangelism is strategically right or wrong, the more interesting
development is the increasingly explicit
doctrine that the Episcopal
Church is a non-doctrinal communion.
The eternity
of the Son was a major concern in the
development of the orthodox
doctrine of the Trinity in the early
church.
I would like to suggest that this important text refers not only to the Incarnation
of the Son
of God in Bethlehem but also to the Holy Eucharist and that it is prophetic
of the
Church's
development of doctrine, supporting that
development, and putting it within a cosmic context.
Questions also are raised about the identity
of the
church that plays such a major role in the Radical Orthodox account
of history, about whether there is a
doctrine of providence implicit in it, about the dismissal or ignoring
of Protestantism, about the role
of Jesus in its Christianity, about the role
of Socrates in its Platonism, about its failure to engage with the challenge
of modern scientific and technological
developments, about how other faith traditions are related to this version
of faith, and about whether this is a habitable orthodoxy for ordinary life.
However, Dei Verbum seems to come closer to Cardinal Newman's understanding
of the
development of doctrine when it emphasizes that the teaching office
of the
Church is the servant
of the word
of God.
The factors
of chief importance in the
development of this theology were: (a) the Old Testament — and Judaism --(b) the tradition
of religious thought in the Hellenistic world, (c) the earliest Christian experience
of Christ and conviction about his person, mission, and nature — this soon became the tradition
of the faith or the «true
doctrine» — and (d) the living, continuous, ongoing experience
of Christ — only in theory to be distinguished from the preceding — in worship, in preaching, in teaching, in open proclamation and confession, as the manifestation
of the present Spiritual Christ within his
church.
It has fifteen essays divided into four main sections: Faith and Reason, The
Church, Conscience and
Development of Doctrine.
And because the Holy Spirit is active in the
Church, we also find authentic
development of doctrine.
For him the
development of doctrine does not simply derive from progress in thought and ideas, but is an aspect
of deepening in being and communion
of both mind and heart with God in Christ, which is the work
of the Holy Spirit in the
Church.
Such a history does not only exist because a very great deal
of time and theological
development and clarification was needed in some cases before the
Church's awareness
of its belief had finally fought its way to a clear realization that such and such a definite
doctrine of the
Church is really contained in divine revelation, is a genuine expression
of what has always been globally believed or an obligatory defence against heretical misinterpretation
of what has been handed down.
This has immediate implications for the elaboration and
development of moral
doctrine, for consultative processes and for the free flow
of ideas in the
church.
In the first chapter
of John's Gospel» the scriptural starting point
of the Logos
doctrine of the
Church» Logos is a further
development of the Jewish concept
of God's wisdom.
So the evolution
of the
Church's understanding
of the gospel over the centuries is not a matter
of «paradigm shifts,» or ruptures, or radical breaks and new beginnings; it's a question
of what theologians call the
development of doctrine.
The vocation
of St. John as the apostle
of the Divinity
of Christ's one person has fed and powered the true
development of the
doctrine of the
Church at all times, not least in the first centuries in which the true
doctrine of both the divinity and the humanity are hammered out in great Councils, and the concepts are refined in the fires
of contrary heresy against either the full Divinity or the full Humanity
of Christ.
For him the
development of doctrine does not simply derive from progress in thought and ideas, but is an aspect
of the deepening in being and communion
of both mind and heart which is the gift
of God to his
Church in Christ.
The meeting began on a Wednesday night at the bucolic campus
of the University
of Saint Mary
of the Lake in Mundelein, Illinois, and the frank discussion quickly moved into a variety
of topics including several difficult ones such as the Council
of Trent, which is particularly anti-Protestant but still binding for Catholics, and the Catholic
doctrine of the
church as the prolongation
of the incarnation
of Christ (presented by Father Thomas A. Baima, the Catholic co-chair
of the event), as well as social issues ranging from care for the poor, abortion, and the recent
developments in gender and sexual ethics in the West.
Who better to discuss the
development of doctrine in the
Church than the man who assisted at the Second Vatican Council as a peritus?
In fact we would argue that true
development of doctrine, including the social teaching
of the
Church, is only possible on the basis
of the orthodox doctrinal and spiritual principles.
Enns does not know this Tradition and, although he recognises a kind
of «
development of doctrine» within the Bible itself, he does not have the theological tools to set his own thinking in dialogue with the living theology
of the
Church.
But if this is true, then it can not now separate its
doctrines of God, Christ,
Church, and Faith from the historical
development of human consciousness and the fact
of cosmic evolution.
Studies in the history
of doctrine demonstrate that there is
development in the teaching
of the
Church.
The
development of doctrine in the early
Church — the emergence
of the creeds — is the story
of how people tried to explain mysteries, that is to draw them down into the grasp
of human imagination.
The evolution
of the
Church's understanding
of the gospel is not a matter
of «paradigm shifts» or ruptures; it's a question
of development of doctrine.
They say, in the words
of Chillingworth, «There are popes against popes, councils against councils, some fathers against others, the same fathers against themselves, a consent
of fathers
of one age against a consent
of fathers
of another age, the
Church of one age against the
Church of another age:»... I shall admit that there are in fact certain apparent variations in its teaching... I shall attempt to explain them to the exculpation
of that teaching in point
of unity, directness, and consistency Introduction to the
Development of Doctrine, 1846
The interpretive key that may provide the most utility here is that
Church doctrine proceeds by way
of the principle
of organic
development.
Russell Hittinger has brought out further complexities
of Thomistic
developments in the wake
of Aeterni Paths: «Thomists developed rather freewheeling accounts
of the political, economic, legal and social order -LSB-... putting] Thomism in an offensive mode as far as social
doctrine went -LSB-... whereas] in matters related to sacred
doctrine [philosophical] Thomism would be put into a defensive role» such that scholasticism could not be publicly challenged within the
Church.