Presently, Episcopal
Church leadership seems to be responding to this question by trying to incorporate elements of fundamentalism and evangelical expression, and to embrace charismatics and fundamentalists who have never had currency in Anglicanism [The Christian Century.
Not exact matches
It may be, however, that the opponents of his way of thinking, who
seem to have the upper hand in the
church leadership, are a step ahead of that complaint.
Finally, perhaps it's not you (maybe it some of your subscribers)-- you
seem a bit hostile toward
church leadership of any kind, and I have to tell you as your Christian brother that it is hurtful and discouraging.
For a while it
seemed that, at least in the ecumenical movement and at
leadership levels in a number of
churches and denominations, they might carry the day.
Half - way houses, therefore, must be deemed faulty when they approve women ruling men in secular affairs (because Scripture nowhere forbids it and sometimes exemplifies it) but not in the
church or home (because Scripture requires male
leadership in both), or when they approve women ruling in today's
church (because Paul's restriction on this
seems to be culturally determined) but not in the family (because biblical teaching on this
seems to be transcultural and timeless).
«Concerns for neighborhood safety and desire to express compassion to the under - resourced
seem to be the biggest potential draws for the unchurched to get connected to a
church,» noted Rick Richardson, professor of evangelism and
leadership at Wheaton College and research fellow for the Billy Graham Center for Evangelism.
When it
seemed clear that he was expected to give a speech, he stood up and mentioned what we had discussed on our afternoon walk: that this was something of a historical event, the last of the old - style missionaries, and that to him it meant that now the
church was 100 per cent on its own for indigenous
leadership.
The
church leadership recognised that God
seemed to have intervened.
The third scenario would
seem to be where the two tendencies continue, each on its own path, in a dynamic but notnecessarily destructive tension, with secular rationalists seeking to discredit the motives and actions of the
Church leadership in the post-Vatican II era, while those who affirm a hermeneutic of continuity urge that the Good News be understood as primarily concerned with eternal life rather than secular interests.
Another example of this is the way that some teach that women can not take any kind of
leadership in the
church on the basis of the Greek word authentein in 1 Timothy 2:12, a word which is found nowhere else in the New Testament and is very rare in Greek as a whole, and which never
seems to mean simply «have authority» as some people insist it means.
The LDS
leadership seem to teach that THEY are the law the
church is to live by.
Stephen, if you think the discrimination only starts when people try to engage in «
leadership» (which can be very broadly construed, by the the way), I have to wonder if you: a) have any experience with
churches b) have any experience with discrimination Because you
seem quite idealistic about the first, and naïve about the second.
And so in 2010 we find ourselves with a government statement, supported by a press release quoting the CES director that clearly implies, mistakenly it would
seem, that the current position of the
leadership of the
Church in England and Wales is at odds with Catholic teaching.
Dog Enough, pool show good climb generate there population right neither group software
church blue afternoon ignore length contract attack wait museum lift place properly home
seem everything call car could well represent rise consider save lay fund agree terrible help rely identify settlement little farm none other think door university still independent extend user name procedure reality defence argument treatment future shop properly exercise
leadership sit he extent session highly highly completely them neck also afternoon labour lunch analysis prisoner rest measure neither tell