Successfully argued Ninth
Circuit appeals in these cases, People of the State of California v. Chevron, et al., 872 F. 2d 1410 (9th Cir.
Not exact matches
Still, experts said those comments were likely to hurt the government's
case in the Ninth
Circuit Court of
Appeals, which heard arguments on Tuesday night over whether the TRO should be upheld while the order's legality is established.
Separately on Tuesday, a judge for the U.S. Federal Court of
Appeals for the Fourth
Circuit, ruled narrowly
in favor of the subsidies
in a
case called David King.
In a 1983 case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit stated: «Puerto Rico, despite the lack of formal statehood, enjoys the shelter of the Eleventh Amendment in all respects.&raqu
In a 1983
case, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the First
Circuit stated: «Puerto Rico, despite the lack of formal statehood, enjoys the shelter of the Eleventh Amendment
in all respects.&raqu
in all respects.»
7th US
Circuit Court of
Appeals nominee Amy Coney Barrett, a Notre Dame law professor, was questioned intensely about her Catholic faith as a result of past writings expressing her beliefs on whether Catholic judges should recuse themselves from death - penalty
cases if they believed they would be unable to impartially uphold the law, writing that —
in limited situations — judges should step back
in cases that conflict with their personal conscience.
In a recent court
case, the 9th
Circuit Court of
Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marijuana.
Last week, AARP filed an
appeal of the Fifth
Circuit ruling, while New York, Oregon and California filed a motion asking the court for permission to rehear the
case in front of the full panel of judges — known as an en banc review.
«The Movants have had ample opportunity to intervene
in the multiple
cases challenging the so - called «Fiduciary Rule»
in district courts around the country,
in appeals in two other
circuits courts, and
in this
appeal, which was decided by this Court more than a month ago,» the filing said.
The last - minute rewrite prompted a federal judge
in September to dismiss challenges by Wheaton College and Belmont Abbey, but the D.C.
Circuit Court of
Appeals agreed to consider the
cases.
Three members of the 5th U.S.
Circuit Court of
Appeals will hear arguments on Thursday (June 7)
in the
case of the monks of St. Joseph Abbey versus Louisiana funeral homes.
This identical question was recently presented and passed on by the
Circuit Court of
Appeals for this
Circuit in the
case of McIlhenny v. Gaidry (1918), 253 Fed.
The Court of
Appeals for this
Circuit in the Gaidry
case took note of these two
cases, but held them not reconcilable with the later ruling of the United States Supreme Court
in Baglin v. Cusenier, 221 U. S. 680 [1 T. M. Rep. 147], wherein it was held that the fact that the primary meaning of the word «Chartreuse» was geographical did not prevent the acquisition of the exclusive right to its use as the designation of a liqueur made by the monks of the Monastery of La Grande Chartreuse.
After the latest rejection of his
appeal by the 2nd
Circuit, Tom Brady could take his Deflategate
case to the highest court
in the land.
In the
case of the Maryland ban on assault rifles the 4th
Circuit Court of
Appeals held that «we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war».
The final resolution came when the
case was dismissed
in the Court of
Appeals for the First
Circuit, when the court decided that they can not intervene:
The Padilla
case in 2005 did give rise to a precedent
in the United States Court of
Appeals for the 4th
Circuit that supports the practice, although a subsequent ruling
in the Al - Marri
case arguably muddied the waters.
Now that the DADT Repeal has been implemented the The Ninth
Circuit Court of
Appeals has dismissed the Log Cabin Republican's
case against «Don't Ask, Don't Tell» stating that «the repeal,
in short, gave Log Cabin «everything» its complaint «hoped to achieve.
On Friday Silver asked the Second
Circuit Court of
Appeals to let the Supreme Court weigh
in before the Manhattan U.S. Attorney retries his
case.
Schneiderman and 17 other state attorneys general on Aug. 2 won the right to intervene
in the
case in a ruling by the D.C.
Circuit of the U.S. Court of
Appeals.
The two men will remain free on bail — potentially for months — until the Second
Circuit US Court of
Appeals makes its decision
in their
case.
The U.S. Court of
Appeals, D.C.
circuit, has set a briefing schedule
in Libertarian Party v D.C. Board of Elections, the
case over whether election officials must count the votes cast for a declared write -
in candidate for President.
The Second
Circuit Court of
Appeals on Thursday threw out the 2015 conviction of former New York State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver on honest services fraud because the charge to the jury did not comport with the Supreme Court's 2016 decision
in the
case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, which narrowed the definition of an «official act.»
After the 2nd
Circuit ruled last week, the three - judge panel hearing the
appeal in the Skelos
case asked lawyers to submit additional legal arguments
in light of the Silver decision.
Silver's attorney, Steven Molo, relied on the McDonnell
case — which drastically narrowed the definition of corruption — when arguments began before a three - judge panel of the Second
Circuit Court of
Appeals in Manhattan on Thursday, the New York Times reported.
The decision from the Second
Circuit Court of
Appeals was sparked by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision
in the
case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, whose conviction was overturned by the nation's highest court
in a ruling that narrowed the definition of the types of official acts that could be considered as part of quid pro quo arrangements.
On August 9, the U.S. Court of
Appeals, D.C.
Circuit, denied the Libertarian Party's request to rehear the
case over whether election officials must count write -
ins for declared presidential write -
in candidates.
I was reading the Wikipedia page for the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Second
Circuit when I noticed that a «
Circuit Justice» (
in this
case, Ruth Bader Ginsburg) was mentioned.
In two
cases, the Second
Circuit Court of
Appeals sought to translate Supreme Court decisions to different factual situations.
The judges
in the redistricting
case, Reena Raggi and Gerard E. Lynch of the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second
Circuit and Dora L. Irizarry of Federal District Court
in Brooklyn, noted that the magistrate judge they assigned to draw the new map managed to do
in just two weeks what lawmakers «have been unable, or unwilling, to provide New York State voters
in more than a year.»
New court precedent has impacted the
cases of New York lawmakers before: precedent set by the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Second
Circuit eventually resulted
in a new trial being ordered for Skelos» predecessor
in the Senate, Joseph Bruno.
The Second
Circuit court did not rule
in Smith's
case, nor
in that of convicted ex-Queens Republican Vice-Chair Vincent Tabone, who also argued an
appeal before the panel Thursday.
«
In addition, my office will work closely with the plaintiffs in this case to oppose any stay, pending the appeal, and to urge the second circuit to uphold the district court's decision.&raqu
In addition, my office will work closely with the plaintiffs
in this case to oppose any stay, pending the appeal, and to urge the second circuit to uphold the district court's decision.&raqu
in this
case to oppose any stay, pending the
appeal, and to urge the second
circuit to uphold the district court's decision.»
The U.S. Second
Circuit Court of
Appeals on Tuesday will hear oral arguments
in the
case of Shew vs. Malloy, a legal challenge to the key provisions of Connecticut's post-Newtown gun control legislation.
The Seventh
Circuit Court of
Appeals yesterday reheard oral arguments
in the
case of an Indiana college math instructor who was allegedly denied promotion and ultimately fired for being a lesbian.
The disgraced pol from Albany, Sheldon Silver, asked Friday if the Second
Circuit Court of
Appeals to let the Supreme Court weigh
in before the Manhattan U.S. Attorney retries his
case.
The schedule suggests that if Mr. Silver loses his motion, he will be sentenced sometime
in the spring, after which he can
appeal his
case to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second
Circuit in Manhattan.
In the most recent
case, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Second
Circuit on June 4 denied a motion by Central Hudson and the PSC to suspend the implementation.
The Secretary of State did not
appeal the 2011 decision, but the Ohio legislature intervened
in the
case and
appealed to the 6th
Circuit.
On 27 September, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit hears arguments
in a
case challenging the regulations, brought by a coalition of 27 states.
The U.S. Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit, the second most powerful court
in the country behind the Supreme Court, heard two
cases challenging the Environmental Protection Agency's first rules to crack down on mercury from the country's fleet of electric generating units.
But that court, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the D.C.
Circuit,
in a 2 - 1 decision
in April overturned the preliminary injunction, allowing research to continue until Lamberth ruled on the merits of the underlying
case.
In a motion filed yesterday with the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the D.C.
Circuit, the UC regents write that they are the largest NIH grantee affected by the
case.
Brett Myers, a Dallas lawyer representing Machete Productions, told Watchdog.org that the production company is considering whether to take their
case to the U.S. Supreme Court after the Fifth
Circuit Court of
Appeals in New Orleans ruled against them
in December.
The U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Seventh
Circuit, acting
in a
case that has been closely monitored across the nation, has upheld a federal district judge's order freezing $ 47.5 - million
in Education Department funds pending the Reagan Administration's payment of desegregation aid to Chicago's schools.
And
in another
case that has gained widespread attention, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Eighth
Circuit last week refused to delay implementation of a voluntary student - desegregation plan involving public schools
in St. Louis and its suburbs.
In its decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit parted ways with the rulings of two other federal appeals courts in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18, 1983
In its decision, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit parted ways with the rulings of two other federal appeals courts in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18,
Appeals for the Second
Circuit parted ways with the rulings of two other federal
appeals courts in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18,
appeals courts
in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18, 1983
in similar
cases, involving teachers
in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18, 1983
in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18, 1983.)
In a terse, one - page order, the justices ruled 7 to 0 that any appeal in the school - finance case would had to have been filed by July 21, 1993, four months after Montgomery County Circuit Court Judge Eugene W. Reese issued the controversial rulin
In a terse, one - page order, the justices ruled 7 to 0 that any
appeal in the school - finance case would had to have been filed by July 21, 1993, four months after Montgomery County Circuit Court Judge Eugene W. Reese issued the controversial rulin
in the school - finance
case would had to have been filed by July 21, 1993, four months after Montgomery County
Circuit Court Judge Eugene W. Reese issued the controversial ruling.
In March of this year, shortly after the Peter Jennings Project conference, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, ruling that prosecution of the Tunkhannock teens was «in retaliation for [the plaintiffs»] exercise of her constitutional rights not to attend the education program,» effectively ending prosecution of the case before it bega
In March of this year, shortly after the Peter Jennings Project conference, the Third
Circuit Court of
Appeals agreed, ruling that prosecution of the Tunkhannock teens was «
in retaliation for [the plaintiffs»] exercise of her constitutional rights not to attend the education program,» effectively ending prosecution of the case before it bega
in retaliation for [the plaintiffs»] exercise of her constitutional rights not to attend the education program,» effectively ending prosecution of the
case before it began.
In a
case of great interest to districts statewide, the Glendale Unified High District had asked the justices to reverse a ruling by the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the 9th
Circuit holding that Arizona's...
The U.S. Court of
Appeals for the 6th
Circuit,
in Cincinnati, said on May 1 that the entire 14 - member court would rehear the
case of Pontiac School District v. Spellings.