Sentences with phrase «city man u»
With Chelsea Man City Man U strong I'd settle for one EPL every 5 years.
http://www.justarsenal.com/ Not exact matches
Does he think Man U, Man City and Chelsea are nonentities?
With Chelsea, Man U and City struggling, we will still likely get fewer points this season than last season.
For me Man U are the favorites for the title, Chelsea could be tougher than I thought and I think City will do worse than most expect, given that most have them as title favorites.
Man U, Chelsea and City will all have new managers who all will look to add a world class striker IMO, whats the chance Wenger will out bid these clubs for Aubameyaung or Lewendoski?
Monreal is the reason why we lost to Swansea City and draw against Man U
Well actually we've most certainly improved against the top 6, beating city and Man u, we are on track for 3rd maybe 2nd, and we've got a good chance of winning the FA cup again... so I'd say we most certianly progressed.
-- In our current set up: Coq = DM, Carzola = B2B — Juve: Vidal = DM, Pogba = B2B — Man U: Carrick = DM, Herrera = B2B — City: Fernandiho = DM, Yaya = B2B — Chelsea: Matic = DM, Ramires (when playing) = B2B — Lpool: Lucas = DM, Henderson = B2B
Final point it's not even about what the others are doing (Man U, City, Chelsea), it is simply about us addressing our weaknesses and making the team better giving it a better chance at silverware and retaining are best players.
Wengers method of bluffing the board & fans to keep him for a further season... > We loose enough games to take us completely off winning the league, then say it wasn't in our control, we then fight till the end and win last few games so we look good and like we worked hard to earn the 4th place trophy.He then links us with awesome transfers (which we all know wont happen), and finally while Man U / City and Chelsea organise pre-season friendlies against top clubs, we play the weak ones, win and look all good to go next season without any additions... AND THEN REALITY STRIKES..
You all should remember that we haven't played Man City, Man U, Spurs, Everton.
Ludogorets (away)-- terrible, Spurs — terrible, Man U — terrible, Everton — ridiculous, City — terrible.
Also, sadly it is not about hoping Chelsea will drop 10 points relative to us, it is also hoping we can beat Liverpool, City, Spurs and Man U in the process.
City are the only side out of the top 5 that actually look as if they've improved their team, Man U and Liverpool don't look like teams and have been pretty poor.
He'll run down his contract, join Man U, or City... win the golden boot and EPL with them.
Would hv love both teams (Man u and Man city) to loose in 2mrw's game bt its nt possible so a draw will be good.
Realistically City and Man U face a big battle.
So yeah, of course they won't talk about the lower budget Arsenal still has compared to Chelsea, Man U or Man City.
The other day in Nairobi I bumped into a group of young men selling sport merchandise and after a close look, I saw replica shirts of Man U, Man City and Chelsea selling like hot cakes but there no Arsenal shirts.
The guy scored against Man u, Man city, Liverpool, Tottenham etc last season, and yet u claim he won't manage a single goal in La Liga?
We don't have the money, ambition (of the owner), or the reputation, to spend and attract the world's best players like Man U or City could should they finish outside the top 4.
We don't need a child when the likes of Man U, City, looserpool are spending big and buying good, I have to admit.
than who???? Chelsea, Man city, Man u and even Liverpool can blow us out of the water with their wages!!!
With the current squad, winning the EPL is possible if some matter of misfortune (injuries, etc) falls on our top competitors (Chelsea, Man U, Man City).
We are already unable to really compete at the same level as Bayern, Real, Barca, City, Man U & Chelsea money wise!
Out of the 14 games left we still got to play against Man City, Man U, Spurs, Everton & Liverpool.
I expect more twists and turns between ourselves, Man U and City (and possibly Liverpool) than between Arsenal and Chelsea.
Meanwhile, Man U and Man City have lots of Ozils and Sanchezes and they will not win the league this year.
Man U, Chelsea + City have an arrogant or naive belief that they should win the EPL every year.
Pool, City and Man U were slightly unlucky.
City and Man U and also from China.
They have depth in their squads, marquee signings to up the tempo, look at Man U, City, Liverpool, Stoke.
I expect more more from Liverpool, Chelsea and Man U this season, I expect Spurs to be good again and I expect City to compete for the title.
And he does not seem to copy from what serious teams are doing the likes of Man U, City, Chelsea and PSG.
Considering Chelsea, Man U, Man City, L'Pool, Everton, Swansea, Spurs and even Stoke City fixtures both home and away, I see us getting more losses with AW as coach and his squad.
They were in the Man U and Man City squads winning things and I don't remember any of their fans complaining about them.
They calculate how many points will Lamar bring to Arsenal and that will be the decision to buy or not whether they need him or not that's the difference between us and Man - U City Chelsea operate,
Let's just see if we can cut it in the PL against a strong City, a Winning ugly Man U and a resurgent Kop under heir klopp.
I would imagine if we had an ambitious owner like Usmanov who hired an ambitious manager like Pep or any other recognized top manager, and made available a budget like Man U has had over the last few years or like City seems to have, then Arsenal would quickly become a club who would have no problem singing top players.
I am more curious to see how the new managers at City, Man U and Chelsea are doing than how Arsenal will be doing.
And looking at man U's two first games one gets the impression of real power there, same City and Chelsea
The good thing is he might not take us backwards immediately but with better managers managing Spurs, City, Liverpool and possibly Man U, time is running out on Arsenal to join the modern game
Last season Giroud scored quite a lot of goals but didn't really score any of note against big teams, this season, he's scored against City, Everton, Liverpool and Man U and they've all been important ones, apart from the United one.
Man U, Chelsea & City have done what they always but guess what only one signing cost more than 40 millions pounds alone (Michy at CFC).
If it was about the silverware he would have gone to the strongest team in England Mann city not Man U (where he could earn the most money).
If my daughter's life depends on it and I would have to pick next years PL winner correct for her to survive I would also bet on City or Man U before I would bet on Arsenal.
now add ManU, I don't even know if Martial or Rooney is their main striker... Liverpool??? We are close to City in that we can still at least spread the goals If there is really a top top striker available, u'd expect Man U / Man city to swoopCity in that we can still at least spread the goals If there is really a top top striker available, u'd expect Man U / Man city to swoopcity to swoop him
Top clubs have main strikers, Costa — Chelsea, Ibra - Man U, Aguero — City, Lewndowski — Bayern, etc..
I do think Czech could give us 3 or 4 points extra but it ain't enough to overhaul Chelsea man city and if van gahl gets his act together could lose ground to Man U.man city and if van gahl gets his act together could lose ground to Man U.Man U....
Perhaps a Messi type player might deflate the opponents if he was thought to be injured but a Silva (if you look at City's options) or a Laca will hardly throw a team like Man U into a losing performance by their mere presence if you ask me.