Ruling in the Oklahoma
City school desegregation case, a divided U.S. Supreme Court holds that districts that were once racially segregated by law may be freed from court - ordered desegregation plans if they have done their best to eradicate the vestiges of their discriminatory systems and have met court orders.
Not exact matches
But in recent weeks, settlements in
cases involving Bakersfield, Calif., and the Ohio
cities of Lima and Cincinnati have once again directed attention to these specialty
schools as they were originally conceived — as tools for
desegregation.
Kansas
City schools were already predominantly minority, and the Supreme Court had ruled in the Detroit
case that surrounding
school districts not found guilty of segregation could not be pulled into a
case to provide more white students for
desegregation.
Eleven
school districts in suburbs of Kansas
City, Mo., have asked a federal appeals court to halt the St. Louis area's voluntary cross-district
desegregation plan, contending that it could imperil their own
desegregation case.
St. Louis's
desegregation case dates from 1972, when Minnie Liddell, a black parent, filed suit against the St. Louis
school board contending that her children were receiving an inferior education in a predominantly black
city school.
The parties in the Kansas
City, Mo.,
desegregation case announced the accord last month, just weeks after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling absolved the state from having to finance some of the
school district's most expansive and expensive
desegregation remedies.
Several Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court asked last week whether federal - court supervision of the Kansas
City, Mo.,
school district has gone too far as the Court heard oral arguments in a major
school -
desegregation case.
Boston's
school desegregation case is a seminal chapter in the
city's history and part of America's painful interracial narrative.