Sentences with phrase «civil injunctions under»

Civil Injunctions under the Protection From Harassment Act 1997 to prevent harassment and / or stalking

Not exact matches

On March 6, 2018, Judge Jack B. Weinstein of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled that virtual currencies are commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and therefore subject to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) anti-fraud and anti-manipulation enforcement authority.1 Granting the CFTC's request for a preliminary injunction against the defendants who allegedly engaged in deception and fraud involving virtual currency spot markets, Judge Weinstein noted that «[u] ntil Congress clarifies the matter,» the CFTC has «concurrent authority» along with other state and federal administrative agencies and civil and criminal courts over transactions in virtual currency.2

Although the federal labor policy contained in Taft - Hartley is not to be ignored, the paramount concern must be with the public policy against racial discrimination which is reflected in civil rights legislation and in the Court's New Negro Alliance decision, which immunized racial - labor disputes from injunctions under NorrisLa Guardia long before the advent of civil rights legislation»...

A private nuisance, however, is a civil tort under which the plaintiff can sue for damages or injunction if the public nuisance substantially interferes with the use of an individual's adjoining land.

However, more recently it has resorted to the civil law by seeking injunctions under LGA 1972, s 222.

The focus of his work in this area typically arises out of claims for interim injunctive relief where issues of jurisdiction arise (including under the Recast Brussels Regulation), and injunctions in support of foreign proceedings (under section 25 Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982).

This article suggests that any strategy to counter NVDA should be civil injunction led and should be policed under the civil provisions of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (PHA 1997).

Civil litigation relating to non-unionized employees is his primary area of expertise, including wrongful dismissal litigation, labour injunctions, departing employee litigation and the statutory obligations of employers under Ontario's Employment Standards Act and Human Rights Code.

The case was before the advent of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 and the judge granted summary judgment under RSC Ord 14 and injunctions to prevent the use of the domain names by the defendants.

Under California Civil Code section 3426.4, «[if] a claim of misappropriation is made in bad faith, a motion to terminate an injunction is made or resisted in bad faith, or willful and malicious misappropriation exists, the court may award reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the prevailing party.»