Set against the Gosling decision, it is worth remembering the ideology as outlined by Lord Justice Jackson in his Review of
Civil Litigation Costs - Final Report of December 2009, para 2.11: «On the basis of the material provided during the Costs Review, it seems to me inevitable that, provided the costs rules are drafted so as (a) to deter frivolous or fraudulent claims and (b) to encourage acceptance of reasonable offers, the introduction of one way costs shifting will materially reduce the costs of personal injuries litigati
Litigation Costs - Final Report of December 2009, para 2.11: «On the basis of the material provided during the Costs Review, it seems to me inevitable that, provided the costs rules are drafted so as (a) to deter frivolous or fraudulent claims and (b) to encourage acceptance of reasonable offers, the introduction of one way costs shifting will materially reduce the costs of personal injuries litigation.&r
Costs - Final Report of December 2009, para 2.11: «On the basis of the material provided during the
Costs Review, it seems to me inevitable that, provided the costs rules are drafted so as (a) to deter frivolous or fraudulent claims and (b) to encourage acceptance of reasonable offers, the introduction of one way costs shifting will materially reduce the costs of personal injuries litigation.&r
Costs Review, it seems to me inevitable that, provided the
costs rules are drafted so as (a) to deter frivolous or fraudulent claims and (b) to encourage acceptance of reasonable offers, the introduction of one way costs shifting will materially reduce the costs of personal injuries litigation.&r
costs rules are drafted so as (a) to deter frivolous or fraudulent claims and (b) to encourage acceptance of reasonable offers, the introduction of one way
costs shifting will materially reduce the costs of personal injuries litigation.&r
costs shifting will materially reduce the
costs of personal injuries litigation.&r
costs of personal injuries
litigationlitigation.»