Sentences with phrase «civil court cases with»

Not exact matches

When we seek instead to «pay something back to the victims and bring them closure,» we are doing a justice either lower (as in civil - court cases) or higher (as in repaying blood with blood)» but, in any case, something that should not be a model for how we deal with criminals.

The state's highest court will decide whether to make NYPD disciplinary records public in a case filed by the New York Civil Liberties Union with the support of multiple news organizations.

A seventh alleged victim, whose case is being handled by a different law firm from the other six defendants, planned to sue in U.S. District court, claiming civil rights violations, according to people familiar with that case.

Their first meeting, and interactions with Edie Windsor, the plaintiff in the landmark 2013 civil rights case in which the Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of «marriage» and «spouse» can apply only to opposite - sex unions was unconstitutional.

With the civil case ended Marriette Brew Oppong was to prosecute the criminal case against Woyome case at the High court and called eight witnesses, including former Deputy Minister of Finance, Kwaku Agyemang Manu and staff of the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning as well as the former Minister of Education, Youth and Sports, Yaw Osafo - Maafo.

Rensselaer County DA Joel E. Abelove filed a civil complaint in state Supreme Court that seeks to overturn an executive order Cuomo signed two years ago giving the state attorney general the authority to usurp local district attorneys in cases in which unarmed civilians are killed during confrontations with police.

The Home Office said the civil orders, which would restrict an individual's ability to travel or communicate with certain people, could be used where there was insufficient evidence for a prosecution, or while waiting for a case to come to court.

The state's highest court will decide whether to make NYPD disciplinary records public in a case filed by the New York Civil Liberties Union with the support of news organizations including The New York Post.

Rensselaer County District Attorney Joel E. Abelove filed a civil complaint in state Supreme Court Wednesday that seeks to overturn an executive order Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed two years ago giving the state attorney general the authority to usurp local district attorneys in cases in which unarmed civilians are killed during confrontations with police.

In hindsight, the sugar daddy should have just gone ahead with his case in an actual civil court.

Coinciding with its world premiere at Cannes, Focus Features has released for writer - director Jeff Nichols» upcoming drama Loving, which explores the real - life courage and commitment of an interracial couple, Richard and Mildred Loving (Joel Edgerton and Ruth Negga), whose civil rights case, Loving v. Virginia, went all the way to the Supreme Court.

Kobe Bryant was given a standing ovation despite facing a sex - assault charge in 2003 (which was dropped after the accuser refused to testify — a civil case was later settled out of court with Bryant apologising to the plaintiff without admitting guilt).

Paired with young Jewish lawyer Friedman in a segregationist court, he's forced to fight prejudice as he and Friedman work their case — which helped set the stage for the future Civil Rights Movement.

An interview with Professor Gary Orfield, Co-Director of the Civil Rights Project at Harvard May 2004 marks 50 years since the landmarkBrown v. Board of Education Supreme Court case that declared «separate not equal» and jumpstarted a legally mandated approach to desegregate the nation's schools.

Massachusetts 2020 and the Nellie Mae Education Foundation, along with education, civil rights and child advocacy leaders, submitted an amicus curiae brief to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in support of the plaintiffs in the Hancock vs. Driscoll school financing case.

High expectations for students with unique needs An important case being heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on Jan 11, Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, is being supported by civil rights groups and school choice advocates alike.

That plan stems from the 1974 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the landmark civil rights case, Lau v. Nichols, that ordered San Francisco's schools to provide Chinese children who didn't speak or understand English with a bridge to the curriculum.

Proponents jumped on board the campaign with all sorts of promises that the standards were a civil rights cause, declaring them to be «Brown 2.0 ″ for education — a reference to Brown vs. Board of Education, the landmark Supreme Court case mandating racial integration in public schools.

Each district court shall provide litigants in all civil cases with at least one alternative dispute resolution process, including, but not limited to, mediation, early neutral evaluation, minitrial, and arbitration as authorized in sections 654 through 658.

O. Any final and definitive decision of an administrative law judge, or in the case such decision is appealed, a final and definitive judgment of an appellate court, issued in connection with any hearing held pursuant to this Chapter and the Administrative Procedure Act shall be considered a valid and final judgment that may be made executory by the commissioner in accordance with the Code of Civil Procedure.

The heavy hand of the fossil fuel industry works mostly in legal ways such as the «I'm an Energy Voter» campaign in the U.S. Failure of executive and legislative branches to deal with climate change makes it essential for courts, less subject to pressure and bribery from special financial interests, to step in and protect young people, as they did minorities in the case of civil rights.

14) March 2, 2012 The Virginia Supreme Court rules in the University of Virginia's favor in the Mann case, with the majority finding that the university is not a «person» as defined in the Fraud Against Taxpayers Act (FATA), and therefore the Attorney General has no authority under the Act to make civil investigative demands (CIDs) of the university.

This Supreme Court term turned out to be important for civil procedure, with three significant rulings on personal jurisdiction — when a court has control of the particular parties in a Court term turned out to be important for civil procedure, with three significant rulings on personal jurisdiction — when a court has control of the particular parties in a court has control of the particular parties in a case.

Last summer, Superior Court Justice Eva Frank reached out to PBLO for amicus counsel when faced with an unrepresented defendant in a complex civil sexual assault case.

Courts already are wrestling with the challenges presented in general by electronic evidence, which has become almost ubiquitous in both civil and criminal cases.

With the backlog in Ontario civil courts, personal injury plaintiffs have to wait longer for their cases to be processed, putting a growing number of them in financial hardship, says Easy Legal Finance Inc. president and CEO Larry Herscu.

Circuit Courts share concurrent jurisdiction with District Courts in civil non-jury cases in which the amounts in controversy are between $ 10,000 and $ 40,000.

In addition to defending clients charged with major crimes, he also handles all types of civil cases in tribal courts, including now at Fort Belknap and Rocky Boy's.

Laura dedicates significant time to her pro bono work on prisoner civil rights cases in conjunction with the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania's Prisoner Civil Rights Pcivil rights cases in conjunction with the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania's Prisoner Civil Rights PCivil Rights Panel.

He has also represented several companies before the civil courts in cases dealing with restrictive covenants and the validity and financial assessment of stock purchase plans.

I suspect that the real heavy lifting in enhancing access to justice is a matter of procedural reform — specialized decision - making bodies with extremely simplified procedural rules for specific civil law issues (something that actually already exists in certain areas such as Landlord / Tenant, but could be further improved upon), wider permissions for over-the-counter motions, fewer unnecessary court appearances, fewer procedurally - mandated appearances (e.g., going from a Case Conference to a Settlement Conference to a Trial Management Conference, and possibly further, before you can get to a family law trial), and so on.

If by the constitution, every Canadian civil court must hear only cases that present a real and substantial connection with the court, then it should be safe to recognize the judgments of that court elsewhere in the country.

What is proposed, following the Civil Justice Council's report on low value claims up to # 25,000, is a two - tier system with a court officer managing the case and deciding the appropriate form of dispute resolution.

The NSPCC it is not clear on whether or not the levels of abuse against children is increasing, but it seems certain that current historically high numbers of these cases are likely to continue, with knock - on consequences to the civil legal aid and courts system.

A decision released yesterday by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice's Divisional Court has overturned a Superior Court ruling that limited when civil lawyers can share compelled medical records and other personal information with defence counsel in the same case.

In case of «holy marriage with civil recognition», honoured in a church and transcribed in the registers of the marital record of the Municipality, the civil effects cease but to terminate the religious path a pronouncement of annulment from the Regional Ecclesiastic Court or Sacred Rota is needed.

These facts, combined with a second complaint alleging that the lawyer failed to prosecute a civil case he was defending, led the court to accept the disciplinary panel's recommendation that the lawyer be suspended for three months.

A civil litigator with a keen interest in insurance law, Douglas has experience handling a wide variety of cases in the Superior Court of Justice, Divisional Court and Court of Appeal.

This case has had such a significant impact on civil legal proceedings in the courts in Ontario, including with respect to the access to justice, that it has, in the course of one year since the decision was released, been cited in more than 400 reported decisions of the courts in Canada.

Furthermore, in terms of access to justice, the fairly stringent leave conditions under the Supreme Court Act 2003, are a greater barrier to bringing forward an appeal (at least in a civil case) than was the case with the Privy Council where disputes that involved a monetary amount of $ 5,000 or more could be brought as of right.

Unfortunately, the facts of this case bring together two of the problems that are seen very frequently in Civil Practice Court and must be dealt with to make the system work as intended in Toronto.

[2] In this case, the court is confronted with the civil consequences of a breach of the privilege.

It has resulted in the courts, particularly in family cases, becoming clogged - up with litigants in person and the choking off of early advice to deal with people's civil legal problems before they spiral out of control.

In the development of the standard, the difficulty arose in applying the civil standard to cases with quasi-criminal elements (defence allegations of fraud or crime on the plaintiff's part), family law proceedings in the time before no - fault divorce, or matters of equity decided in the common law courts.

The raw data (after culling the sample cases) suggests that about 6.5 % of civil cases end up with a final decision in the NSW Supreme Court and that in Victoria, about 4 % of civil Supreme cases end up with a final decision being made.

Thankfully the majority of the cases I have been involved with were civil and were able to be settled out of court.

The Court of Appeal has recognized the importance of prosecuting civil cases quickly in many cases dealing with dismissal for delay.

In fact, Superior Court Justice Eva Frank reached out to PBLO about perhaps getting amicus counsel recently when faced with an unrepresented defendant in a complex civil sexual assault case.

To this end, «a party to a civil case is entitled to have the jury qualified by the court as to any insurance carrier with a financial interest in the case,» Ford Motor Co. v. Conley, 294 Ga. 530, 550 (2014), for even when the insurer may not be a direct party to the action, a relationship with a non-party insurer with a pecuniary interest may sway a putative juror's vote.

In recent years, we at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) have become increasingly concerned about the frequency and ease with which laws with clear constitutional vulnerabilities have been proposed and passed by Parliament — only to be challenged later, and, in some cases, be struck down by the courts for violating the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.