Sentences with phrase «class objectors»

Aashish Desai — Speaker Bridgeport Seminars 2013 Class Action Litigation & Management Dealing with Class Objectors San Francisco, California August 22, 2013

Not exact matches

LAW360 - Oct 23 - Ashley Madison users suing the online dating site over a 2015 data breach urged a Missouri federal judge to grant final approval to $ 11.2 M deal to end the dispute, arguing that the sole objector had «highly individualized» demands that could not be addressed in a class settlement.

Ninth Circuit Requires Reexamination of Fee Denial to Objector's Counsel and Fee Award to Class Counsel.

Continue reading «Class Action: Class Representative Incentive Agreements That Created Conflicting Interests Required New Consideration Of Fee Award To Objectors And Class Counsel»»

2009), where class representative incentive agreements creating conflicts of interests required reconsideration of fee awards to both objectors and class counsel in the BAR / BRI bar review class action case.

Mr. Torrijos has also co-authored numerous articles concerning class action law, including: Notice 2.0: How Technology is Changing Class Action Notice Procedures (January 2011, Westlaw Journal); The Internet, Indispensable for Providing Class Action Notice (August 16, 2010, Los Angeles Daily Journal); The Rise of «Professional Objectors» in the Class Action Settlements (July 8, 2010, Los Angeles Daily Journal); and The End of Consumer Class Action Arbitrations (May 14, 2010, Los Angeles Daily Jourclass action law, including: Notice 2.0: How Technology is Changing Class Action Notice Procedures (January 2011, Westlaw Journal); The Internet, Indispensable for Providing Class Action Notice (August 16, 2010, Los Angeles Daily Journal); The Rise of «Professional Objectors» in the Class Action Settlements (July 8, 2010, Los Angeles Daily Journal); and The End of Consumer Class Action Arbitrations (May 14, 2010, Los Angeles Daily JourClass Action Notice Procedures (January 2011, Westlaw Journal); The Internet, Indispensable for Providing Class Action Notice (August 16, 2010, Los Angeles Daily Journal); The Rise of «Professional Objectors» in the Class Action Settlements (July 8, 2010, Los Angeles Daily Journal); and The End of Consumer Class Action Arbitrations (May 14, 2010, Los Angeles Daily JourClass Action Notice (August 16, 2010, Los Angeles Daily Journal); The Rise of «Professional Objectors» in the Class Action Settlements (July 8, 2010, Los Angeles Daily Journal); and The End of Consumer Class Action Arbitrations (May 14, 2010, Los Angeles Daily JourClass Action Settlements (July 8, 2010, Los Angeles Daily Journal); and The End of Consumer Class Action Arbitrations (May 14, 2010, Los Angeles Daily JourClass Action Arbitrations (May 14, 2010, Los Angeles Daily Journal).

Panelists discuss recent class action fee decisions that focus on contract attorneys, cy pres awards, preparing fee requests and strategies for dealing with professional objectors.

Plaintiff in a more recent class action says class members should receive refunds from Massage Envy, while a Denver attorney, labeled a «serial objector» by lawyers seeking millions, says their fee request is too high.

In our October 22, 2010 post, we reported on the New York Court of Appeals» decision in Flemming v. Barnwell Nursing, which denied awarding attorney's fees to a class action settlement objector whose efforts helped reduce requested class counsel fees of $ 448,000 down to $ 425,000 in a $ 950,000 settlement.

The state's high court, in its Oct. 20 opinion, also sided with objectors» arguments that they were entitled to more information from class counsel about the time spent on the case, to allow them to «properly articulate their objections.»

The state's high court sided with objectors, vacating an order entered by a trial court awarding class counsel a fee of $ 124 million for their work on a $ 310 million class action settlement.

The objector wished to challenge the amount of fees awarded to class counsel from the $ 36 million common fund created when the jury entered its verdict in favor of the class.

The Court of Appeal said yes, and dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, an objector's appeal from a post-trial judgment in a class action.

«Conscientious Objectors: The Ethics of Representing Objectors to Class Action Settlements» Symposium on Consumer Class Actions, National Consumer Law Center, Washington, DC, November 2007

In this regard, I agree with the general sentiment of the objectors to the Settlement that the Settlement Agreement brings the administration of justice and class actions into disrepute because: (a) the Settlement is more beneficial to Class Counsel than it is to the Class Members; and (b) in its practical effect, the Settlement expropriates the Class Members» property rights in exchange for a charitable donation from Thoclass actions into disrepute because: (a) the Settlement is more beneficial to Class Counsel than it is to the Class Members; and (b) in its practical effect, the Settlement expropriates the Class Members» property rights in exchange for a charitable donation from ThoClass Counsel than it is to the Class Members; and (b) in its practical effect, the Settlement expropriates the Class Members» property rights in exchange for a charitable donation from ThoClass Members; and (b) in its practical effect, the Settlement expropriates the Class Members» property rights in exchange for a charitable donation from ThoClass Members» property rights in exchange for a charitable donation from Thomson.