Not exact matches
This traditional Western conception of deity — this
classical theism —
also teaches that God exists from the divine and of the divine; aseity is taken to be the root attribute of the divine.
, my critic, with a certain partial consistency,
also holds (with
classical theism) that God does not necessarily create at all and might have existed solus.
By working out a neoclassical theory of nonliteral religious discourse consistent with his neoclassical
theism generally, he has not only overcome the notorious contradictions involved in
classical theism's use of analogy and other modes of nonliteral language, he has
also given good reasons for thinking that our distinctively modern reflection about God results from two movements of thought, not simply from one.
Yes, you'll
also find some «
classical theism» in the volume» Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus, Aquinas» but Ed is correct in that it fills only very few pages.
It provided
also the starting point for the long theological tradition of
classical monopolar
theism in the West, which held that divine perfection was exclusively the perfection of eternal and immutable being.
Two traits of
classical theism were that it either (like Stoicism and Spinozism) clearly and consistently denied human freedom (in the straightforward sense of actions being not wholly determined by their causal conditions) or else ambiguously or contradictorily affirmed and denied causal determinism — truly classically in Aquinas's statement that God strictly causes our actions but in such fashion that we were
also free to act otherwise.