Ana Orozco is
the Climate Justice Policy and Programs Coordinator of UPROSE.
Not exact matches
Tonight, I was a little surprised to read the following tweets from Marc Lee, Senior Economist with the Canadian Centre for
Policy Alternatives (CCPA), and Co-Director of the
Climate Justice Project:
Pre-Campaign Community Service / Activism: Worked extensively with Family of Woodstock, Rip Van Winkle Council of Boy Scouts of America, establishing Ulster County Habitat for Humanity, Ralph Darmstadt Homeless Shelter, Ulster County Board of Health and Ulster County Human Rights Commission, Caring Hands Soup Kitchen Board Member, Midtown Rising Board Member, Teacher at Woodbourne Prison, part of Rising Hope Program Platform At a Glance Economy: Supports farming subsidies, job creation through infrastructure investments in rural broadband and sustainable technology, in favor of strong unions Healthcare: Medicare for All Women's Rights: Pro-choice, supports fully funding Planned Parenthood, birth control to be paid for employer, supports equal pay for equal work Racial
Justice: Will work to prevent discrimination of all kind Immigration: Supports comprehensive immigration reform that includes path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants Foreign
Policy: Supports increased pressure on North Korea but not military intervention Environment: Supports measures to stall
climate change and create green jobs LGBTQ: Supports anti-discrimination of all people Gun Control: Will not take NRA money, supports common sense gun control and against Faso's vote to allow the mentally disabled to obtain firearms
At 1 p.m., NY Renews, a coalition of community organizations, environmental
justice groups, labor unions, faith groups, business leaders, and other advocates fighting for equitable
climate policies, holds a telephone press conference to call on Cuomo to step up as a leader for communities hurt most by
climate change.
Interestingly enough, regarding
climate change, there are efforts to have a resolution passed in the UN General Assembly that would ask the ICJ for an advisory opinion that would define states» obligations and responsibilities with respect to greenhouse emissions under international law (see
policy brief issued by The Hague Institute for Global
Justice).
In fact, a growing number of Federal agencies (U.S. Departments of Education and
Justice, CDC, SAMHSA and IES), state departments of education (Connecticut, Georgia, Minnesota and Massachusetts) and large and small districts (from Chicago to Westbrook, Connecticut) are developing school
climate policies and / or laws that support students, parents / guardians, school personnel and even community members learning and working together to create safer, more supportive, engaging and flourishing K - 12 schools.
June 14, 2017 (Chicago)- Educators for Excellence - Chicago (E4E - Chicago), a teacher - led organization, released its
policy paper, «Sounding the Alarm: Building the
Climate and Culture our Students Need,» at an event that brought together over 150 Chicago educators and representatives from health care, criminal
justice, education and city and state government to explore how Chicagoans can better support students struggling with issues such as citywide violence, food instability and homelessness.
Jane writes and speaks frequently on issues of education
justice and access, the impact of poverty on children's life outcomes, the
policy and practice implications of concentrated poverty and trauma on children, school
climate, student discipline and attendance.
ActionAid, International Adivasi Mulvasi Astitva Raksha manch, India AKSI, Indonesia Alliance Sud, Switzerland All Nepal Peasant's Federation, Nepal All Nepal Womens Association, Nepal ARENA, Asia Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development, Thailand Asian Peoples Movement on Debt and Development, Regional Bangladesh Jatiyo Sramik Jote, Bangladesh Bangladesh Krishok Federation, Bangladesh BankTrack, Netherlands Beyond Copenhagen Collective, India Bharat Jan Vigyan Jatha India Both ENDS, Netherlands Brighter Green, United States Bulig Visayas, Philippines Campaign for
Climate Justice Nepal CARE International Center for Biological Diversity, United States Center for Environmental
Justice, Sri Lanka Center for Participatory Research and Development, Bangladesh Centre for 21st Century Issues (c21st), Nigeria
Climate Action Network — France
Climate Action Network Europe
Climate and Sustainable Development Network, Nigeria
Climate Justice Programme, Australia CNCD - 11.11.11, Belgium Coalition on the Environment and Jewish Life, United States COECOCEIBA — FoE Costa Rica Community Development Library, Bangladesh Co-ordination Office of the Austrian Episcopal Conference for International Development and Mission (KOO), Austria Debt Watch, Indonesia Digo Bikas Institute, Kathmandu, Nepal Earth Day Network, United States EcoEquity, United States EKOenergy, Finland / Europe Environmental Rights Action / Friends of the Earth Nigeria EquityBD, Bangladesh Finance & Trade Watch, Austria Freedom from Debt Coalition, Philippines Friends Committee on National Legislation, United States Friends of the Earth Canada Friends of the Earth England, Wales and N Ireland Friends of the Earth International Friends of the Earth Malaysia Friends of the Earth Norway Friends of the Earth Sierra Leone Friends of the Earth U.S. GAIA — Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives, International GEFONT — Trade Union Federation, Nepal Gitib, Philippines GreenLatinos, United States groundWork, Friends of the Earth South Africa Heinrich Boell Stiftung North America, United States Himalaya Niti Abhiyan, India Human Rights Alliance Nepal IBON International, Philippines Indian Social Action Forum, India Institute for Agriculture and Trade
Policy, United States Institute for
Policy Studies,
Climate Policy Project, United States Interamerican Association for Environmental Defense, Latin America International Forum on Globalization, United States International Rivers, United States Jagaran Nepal Jatam Indonesia Jubilee Debt Campaign, United Kingdom Justica Ambiental / Friends of the Earth Mozambique KAU — Anti Debt Coalition, Indonesia Kerala Independent Fishworkers Federation, India KRUHA — Peoples Right to Water Coalition, Indonesia Labour, Health and Human Rights DEvelopment Centre, Nigeria LDC Watch, International Les Amis de la Terre, France Les Amis de la Terre - Togo Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns, United States Migrant Forum in Asia mines, minerals and People (mmP), India Monitoring Sustainability of Globalisation (MSN), Malaysia Nadi Gati Morcha, India National Federation of Hawkers Bangladesh National Federation of Women Hawkers, India National Hawkers Federation, India Nature Code — Centre of Development & Environment, Belgium NOAH Friends of the Earth Denmark Our Rivers Our Life, Philippines Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum Pakistan Kissan Rabita Committee (Farmers) Pan African
Climate Justice Alliance, Africa PAPDA Haiti Philippine Movement for
Climate Justice Rainforest Foundation Norway River Basin Friends, India Rural Reconstruction Nepal Sanlakas, Philippines Sawit Watch, Indonesia SEAFISH for
Justice, Asia SOL — People for Solidarity, Ecology and Lifestyle, Austria Solidaritas Perempuan, Indonesia South Asian Alliance for Poverty Eradication Southern Oregon
Climate Action Now, United States SUPRO, Bangladesh SustainUS, United States Task Force Detainees of the Philippines Tebtebba, Philippines The Development Institute, Ghana Third World Network, International Trade Union
Policy Institute (TUPI), Nepal VOICE, Bangladesh Women's Environment and Development Organisation (WEDO), United States Worldview - The Gambia Zero Waste Europe
Much less systematic attention — again in the context of the global
climate policy debate (as opposed to domestic debates, where thanks to the environmental
justice movement the topic is very much in play)-- has been paid to the problem of inequality within nations.
If the agenda is really public
policy (e.g. «global governance», «
climate justice») then it doesn't matter if the models have any basis in reality; they have been created to support the agenda with a specious «scientific» legitimacy.
September 22nd, 2015 -LRB--RRB- Clean Energy,
Climate Action, Energy
Justice, Energy
Policy, International
Climate Policy» Guest Blog» Comments Off
Currently the Director of Environmental and
Climate Justice at the NAACP, Jacqui Patterson, MSW, MPH, has served as a trainer, organizer, researcher, program manager, and policy analyst on international and domestic issues including women's rights, HIV&AIDS, violence against women, racial justice, economic justice, and environmental and climate justice, with organizations including Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Baltimore City Healthy Start, IMA World Health, United for a Fair Economy, ActionAid, Health GAP, and the organization she co-founded, Women of Color
Climate Justice at the NAACP, Jacqui Patterson, MSW, MPH, has served as a trainer, organizer, researcher, program manager, and policy analyst on international and domestic issues including women's rights, HIV&AIDS, violence against women, racial justice, economic justice, and environmental and climate justice, with organizations including Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Baltimore City Healthy Start, IMA World Health, United for a Fair Economy, ActionAid, Health GAP, and the organization she co-founded, Women of Color
Justice at the NAACP, Jacqui Patterson, MSW, MPH, has served as a trainer, organizer, researcher, program manager, and
policy analyst on international and domestic issues including women's rights, HIV&AIDS, violence against women, racial justice, economic justice, and environmental and climate justice, with organizations including Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Baltimore City Healthy Start, IMA World Health, United for a Fair Economy, ActionAid, Health GAP, and the organization she co-founded, Women of Color U
policy analyst on international and domestic issues including women's rights, HIV&AIDS, violence against women, racial
justice, economic justice, and environmental and climate justice, with organizations including Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Baltimore City Healthy Start, IMA World Health, United for a Fair Economy, ActionAid, Health GAP, and the organization she co-founded, Women of Color
justice, economic
justice, and environmental and climate justice, with organizations including Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Baltimore City Healthy Start, IMA World Health, United for a Fair Economy, ActionAid, Health GAP, and the organization she co-founded, Women of Color
justice, and environmental and
climate justice, with organizations including Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Baltimore City Healthy Start, IMA World Health, United for a Fair Economy, ActionAid, Health GAP, and the organization she co-founded, Women of Color
climate justice, with organizations including Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Baltimore City Healthy Start, IMA World Health, United for a Fair Economy, ActionAid, Health GAP, and the organization she co-founded, Women of Color
justice, with organizations including Center on Budget and
Policy Priorities, Baltimore City Healthy Start, IMA World Health, United for a Fair Economy, ActionAid, Health GAP, and the organization she co-founded, Women of Color U
Policy Priorities, Baltimore City Healthy Start, IMA World Health, United for a Fair Economy, ActionAid, Health GAP, and the organization she co-founded, Women of Color United.
For eight years (2009 - 2017), he served as the Vice President for
Policy, directing issue campaigns on
climate change, environmental, high road workplace, social
justice and economic development issues.
Jessie Smith Noyes Fdn grant for «General support for an organization working to ensure that low income communities, indigenous groups, and communities of color participate in
policy debates on
climate change and food
justice issues in Minnesota and the Midwest to achieve solutions»
She has worked in the field of Environmental and
Climate Justice since 2006 in various capacities including community organizing,
policy analysis, advocacy and research.
Although different theories of distributive
justice would reach different conclusions about what «fairness» requires quantitatively, most of the positions taken by opponents of
climate change
policies fail to pass minimum ethical scrutiny given the huge differences in emissions levels between high and low emitting nations and the enormity of global emissions reductions needed to prevent catastrophic
climate change.
Areas of Expertise: international development and
policy, community organizing, environmental /
climate justice, food
Washington, DC — Dozens of students, teachers, and
climate and
justice advocates will join together for a rally on April 13 at 12:30 pm to urge the D.C. Council to introduce a strong, progressive carbon fee - and - rebate
policy.
Some economic tools frequently used to evaluate public
policy on
climate change such as cost - benefit analysis that don't acknowledge responsibility for allocating the burdens for reducing the threat of
climate change on the basis of distributive
justice are ethically problematic.
This is a call for researchers in different nations to investigate how national debates about
climate change
policies have expressly considered or not ethics and
justice issues in formulating
climate policies.
We work to ensure that communities are equipped to engage in sustainability /
climate action planning that integrates
policies and practices on advancing food
justice, advocating for transportation equity, upholding civil and human rights in emergency management, and facilitate participatory democracy.
Policy wonks will talk of historical responsibility,
climate justice, the right to development, political will and economic capacity.
Have they articulated any position on
climate justice issues that arise in setting ghg emissions
policy or in regard to the adaptation needs of vulnerable nations or people?
It's time to advance precedent - setting
climate protection and economic
justice, right here in the District of Columbia Our proposed carbon fee - and - rebate
policy would hold polluters accountable for the costs of
climate change, level the playing field for clean energy, and lift up every resident of DC (that's you!)
On the occasion of the Friends of the Earth International days of action for
climate justice, activists from Center for the Environment / Friends of the Earth Bosnia & Herzegovina gathered in front of the Republika Srpska government building to show clearly what the country can expect over the next 30 years if the government continues to pursue a
policy of investing in fossil fuels.
Molly Walsh,
climate justice and energy campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe, said: «The proposed renewables target represents barely more than business - as - usual and will send a dangerous signal to national governments that EU renewables
policy is being abandoned.
However, opponents of REDD + have criticised it on the grounds of
climate justice as it fails to address underlying issues related to the participation of indigenous communities, loss of biodiversity and inadequate
policies around deforestation.
Bill McKibben, 350.org founder Naomi Klein, activist and author of the book This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The
Climate 99 posse, Italian hip hop / reggae band Caparezza Florent Compain, President of Les Amis de la Terre France Mark Fodor, Director, CEE Bankwatch Network Johan Frijns, Director, BankTrack Elena Gerebizza, Re: Common Sebastien Godinot, Economist, WWF European
Policy Office Rafael Gonzalez, Dakota / Puerto Rican Water Protector James Hansen, Professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences at Columbia University Wenonah Hauter, Executive Director, Food & Water Watch Rachel Heaton, Mazaska Talks co-founder and Muckleshoot Tribal member / Duwamish descendant Danielle Hirsch, Director, Both ENDS Ziva Kavka Gobbo, Chairperson, Focus Association for Sustainable Development Jeremy Leggett, Founder and Chair, SolarAid; Founder and Director, Solarcentury Simon Lewis, Professor of Global Change Science, UCL Lo Stato Sociale Erri De Luca, Italian novelist, translator and poet Olivier de Marcellus, Coordinator, Climat
Justice Sociale
NOAH is organised in environmental
policy programs concerning Transportation, Food Sovereignty, Environmental education, Forests and Biodiversity,
Climate Justice and Energy, Economic
Justice, Chemicals and International Solidarity.
Because
climate change is a profound problem of ethics, morality and
justice those causing the problem may not use self - interest alone as justification for their
policy responses to human - induced warming, they must respond in ways consistent with their responsibilities and duties to others.
A major significance for
policy of understanding
climate change as a moral and
justice issue, is that nations may not look at economic self - interest alone in formulating
policies, they must consider their ethical and moral obligations to those who are most vulnerable to
climate change.
If
climate change, as the Pope's recent encyclical claims, is a profound global
justice, ethical, and moral problem, this paper identifies questions that should be asked of opponents of
climate change
policies to expose the ethical problems with their positions.
,
Climate justice and geoengineering: Ethics and
policy in the atmospheric Anthropocene (pp. 139 — 160).
Because
climate change is a profound problem of
justice those causing the problem may not use self - interest alone as justification for their
policy responses to human - induced warming, they must respond in ways consistent with their responsibilities and duties to others.
The report was authored by the Environmental
Justice and Climate Change Initiative, a climate justice advocacy group, and Redefining Progress, a nonprofit policy ins
Justice and
Climate Change Initiative, a climate justice advocacy group, and Redefining Progress, a nonprofit policy ins
Climate Change Initiative, a
climate justice advocacy group, and Redefining Progress, a nonprofit policy ins
climate justice advocacy group, and Redefining Progress, a nonprofit policy ins
justice advocacy group, and Redefining Progress, a nonprofit
policy institute.
Assuming that people were following the process and
policy closely while at the same time speaking in UN jargon, is what sometimes prevents us from spreading our
climate justice narrative outside the negotiation rooms.
Although different theories of distributive
justice would reach different conclusions about what «fairness» requires quantitatively, most of the positions taken by opponents of
climate change
policies fail to pass minimum ethical scrutiny given the huge differences in emissions levels between high and low emitting nations and individuals and the enormity of global emissions reductions needed to prevent catastrophic
climate change.
As we call upon political leaders to make stronger
climate action commitments, we must also support and reinforce the efforts of migrant
justice groups that have been organizing for years to improve Canada's refugee inclusion
policies.
He has testified as an expert witness on the theology, ethics, science, and economics of
climate change policy before the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and the Energy and Environment Subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce; briefed the White House Council on Environmental Policy; delivered a paper at a conference at the Vatican sponsored by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace; and spoken at the 2008, 2009, and 2010 International Conferences on Climate Change and at colleges, churches, and other
climate change
policy before the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and the Energy and Environment Subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce; briefed the White House Council on Environmental Policy; delivered a paper at a conference at the Vatican sponsored by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace; and spoken at the 2008, 2009, and 2010 International Conferences on Climate Change and at colleges, churches, and other v
policy before the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and the Energy and Environment Subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce; briefed the White House Council on Environmental
Policy; delivered a paper at a conference at the Vatican sponsored by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace; and spoken at the 2008, 2009, and 2010 International Conferences on Climate Change and at colleges, churches, and other v
Policy; delivered a paper at a conference at the Vatican sponsored by the Pontifical Council for
Justice and Peace; and spoken at the 2008, 2009, and 2010 International Conferences on
Climate Change and at colleges, churches, and other
Climate Change and at colleges, churches, and other venues.
There are several subjects in
climate change
policy - making which raise important ethical and
justice issues.
In short, we will argue improvement is possible in how IPCC deals with ethics,
justice, and equity issues entailed by
climate change
policy - making despite very significant improvements on these matters in the AR5 report compared to prior IPCC reports.
It is also practically important because the first four IPCC reports, although not completely ignoring all ethical and
justice problems with economic arguments about
climate change
policies, failed to examine the vast majority of ethical problems with economic arguments against
climate change
policies while making economic analyses of
climate change
policies the primary focus of Working Group III's work thereby leaving the strong impression that economic analyses, including but not limited to cost - benefit analyses, is the preferred way to evaluate the sufficiency of proposed
climate change
policies.
As a preliminary matter, one of the challenges that IPCC faces in its mandate on of ethics and
justice issues relevant to
climate change
policy - making is that it is not IPCC's role to be prescriptive in deciding what governments should do.
This topic is enormously practically important because nations and others who argue against proposed
climate change
policies usually rely on various economic arguments which often completely ignore the ethical and
justice limitations of these arguments (In the case of the United States, see Brown, 2012.)
Although other sections of the chapter acknowledge that responsibility for
climate change is a matter of distributive
justice, this section and others leave the impression that
climate policy can be based upon economic efficiency grounds alone.
In the first entry in this series we concluded that although the recent IPCC AR 5 Working Group III report is laudable improvement over prior IPCC reports in regard to identifying ethical and equity issues that should be considered in developing
climate change
policy, some criticisms are also warranted of how IPCC has articulated the significance and implications of the ethical,
justice, and equity principles that should guide nations in developing
climate change
policies.
The time has come to demand that nations be required to formulate
policies in response to the
climate change crisis on the basis of what
justice requires.
IPCC can, however, distinguish between prescriptive and descriptive questions that arise in relevant socio - economic literature about
climate policy - making, identify important ethical and
justice issues that arise in this literature, where there is a consensus on ethics and
justice issues in the relevant literature describe the consensus position, where there is no consensus on ethical and
justice issues describe the range of reasonable views on these issues, and identify hard and soft law legal principles relevant to how governments should resolve ethical and
justice issues that must be faced by
policy - makers.
who has a right to participate in
climate change
policy - making, a topic usually referred to under the topic of procedural
justice,