Climate change deniers claim that the emails expose a conspiracy at work to make human - induced global warming a fact.
Not exact matches
You get
deniers claiming climate change is a scam.
I am not
claiming that the following is the main reason, why conservatives
deny climate change, but it certainly plays into it:
During a historic European heat wave, 36 Nobel laureates signed a declaration on
climate change — and tried to shout down the science -
denying claims of one of their own
The
Climate Change deniers seem to be viewed by most people as similar to those who
claim the CIA did 9/11.
After years of first trying to
deny the facts about
climate change, then dragging his feet on doing something about it, now President Bush wants to pre-empt any meaningful legislation and
claim that as his «legacy».
So sad that you
deny the reality that I cited that source to expose the stupidity of your
climate cult's
claim that 100 % of global
climate change is human - caused.
Richard Lindzen offered a presentation entitled «
Climate Change: What Do Scientists Say,» where he claims that there is «much agreement» between climate change deniers and scientists who believe in human - caused climate
Climate Change: What Do Scientists Say,» where he claims that there is «much agreement» between climate change deniers and scientists who believe in human - caused climate c
Change: What Do Scientists Say,» where he
claims that there is «much agreement» between
climate change deniers and scientists who believe in human - caused climate
climate change deniers and scientists who believe in human - caused climate c
change deniers and scientists who believe in human - caused
climate climate changechange.
Some news accounts reported that Latif had predicted global cooling, and
climate change deniers echoed the
claims.
And in addition, think about all the wasted energy the «
climate community» spent mitigating the impact of «deniers,» when «skeptics» could have helped out by listening more carefully to the «climate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capi
climate community» spent mitigating the impact of «
deniers,» when «skeptics» could have helped out by listening more carefully to the «
climate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capi
climate community,» and trying to understand «the
climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capi
climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of
climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capi
climate variability and
change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at
Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capi
Climate Etc. who falsely
claim that the «
climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capi
climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capitalism.
But, as usual, we have a lot of
deniers who cherry - pick data and present little, if any, facts to substantiate their
claims, Personally, with the planet about to crash, I believe the
climate change deniers should be prosecuted and incarcerated for putting the human species at risk.
While ALEC
claims not to
deny climate change, and says they will be making efforts to be more transparent and welcoming to divergent views, environmental groups still question the group's commitment:
He
claimed he was not a
climate change denier; said that he doesn't
deny that the
climate is
changing, but he is skeptical about whether the main cause is due to the gasses that humanity is puting into the atmosphere.
In other words, advocates of
climate change action, respond to
claims of opponents to
climate change programs by
denying the factual
claims of the opponents.
They
claim that evidence of our
climate research was unearthed recently by InsideClimate News and the Los Angeles Times after being suppressed as part of a conspiracy to
deny the existence of
climate change.
Instead of granting the petition and taking advantage of the opportunity, Ecology
denied the petition
claiming that it was doing enough to address
climate change, even though its own documents said exactly the opposite.
16 That figure, again with no qualification, was used in speeches by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a
climate change crusader, such as his call on May 6, 2015 to use the RICO Act — a law intended to combat organized crime syndicates — to put «
deniers» in jail.17 The same
claim appeared in the U.K. Daily Mail.
Parncutt
claims that his idea has been produced by thinking «logically» and «objectively» about the problem of what to do about all those pesky
climate change deniers.
«Monash University Scientist
Denies Empirical Evidence, Asserts All Must Conform To IPCC Faith & Text Main IPCC «AR5» Confirms: Catastrophic
Climate Change Claims By Al Gore Unrealistic Fantasies»
These include
claiming that addressing
climate change will keep the poor in «energy poverty»; citing the global warming «hiatus» or «pause» to dismiss concerns about
climate change; pointing to
changes in the
climate hundreds or thousands of years ago to
deny that the current warming is caused by humans; alleging that unmitigated
climate change will be a good thing; disputing that
climate change is accelerating sea level rise; and
denying that
climate change is making weather disasters more costly.
What needs explaining is not who discovered what — the scientists or the «
deniers» — but how alarmist
claims about
climate change always seem to precede the evidence, such that researchers believe the negative picture before the science has delivered a verdict.
Peter Taylor, the Daily Express's favourite
climate change denier, has
claimed that a Masonic conspiracy has sent a «kook, a ninja freak, some throwback from past lives» to kill him, and insisted that plutonium may «possess healing powers, borne of Plutonic dimension, a preparation for rebirth, an awakener to higher consciousness».
VANCOUVER, B.C. (CN)-- A Pennsylvania State University professor
claims climate -
change denier Timothy Ball defamed him in an interview published by the Frontier Centre for Public Policy, a Winnipeg - based think tank.
That the researcher responsible for the study is clearly not a «
climate change denier» makes the IPCC's credibility gap all the more significant, and it raises new questions regarding the fundamental credibility of any
claim coming from an organization which has relied on shaky science to back its demand for the power to take $ 76 trillion from the economies of the industrialized world and «redistribute» those funds for «green technologies» in the third world.
The second finger
claimed we were
climate change deniers.
The accident at Fukushima is «potentially worse» than the accident at Chernobyl,
claims Vidal, while complaining that his erstwhile green comrades have compared those who question nuclear safety to «
climate change deniers».
This iconic animal has become
climate change's canary in the coal mine, but
climate denier blogs love to
claim the animals» numbers are booming, largely based on the
claims of one Canadian zoologist blogger.
Similarly, Monbiot
claims that
climate change deniers — the ones he compares nuclear sceptics to — have not produced their scientific arguments from an objective, transparent, impartial basis; they are driven by a commitment to a «free - market ideology», or more straightforwardly, by their lust for profit.
Meanwhile,
climate denying prime minister Tony Abbott has been criticised by Nobel laureate and former US vice president Al Gore over Mr Abbott's
claims that the bushfires weren't worsened by
climate change.
While the GCC distributed a «backgrounder» to politicians and media in the early 1990s
claiming «The role of greenhouse gases in
climate change is not well understood,» a 1995 GCC internal memo drafted by Mobil Oil (which merged with Exxon in 1998) stated that: «The scientific basis for the Greenhouse Effect and the potential impact of human emissions of greenhouse gases such as CO2 on
climate is well established and can not be
denied.»
Using absurdity to illustrate absurdity — one more example of how the
claim that «
climate change deniers are untrustworthy because they also
deny the harm of cigarette smoking» implodes under hard scrutiny.
«The focus would be on e-mails stolen from scientists at the University of East Anglia in Britain last fall that
climate -
change deniers have falsely
claimed demonstrate wrongdoing by scientists, including me.»
To suggest that coastlines aren't quite as perilous as green activists
claim, that the government shouldn't be picking winners, or that cheaper energy might be more helpful to poor people than mitigating
climate change was to «deny science», and to be victim of some horrific right wing ideology that would make Hitler's crimes against humanity look like a summer picnic... Climate sceptics were inviting certai
climate change was to «
deny science», and to be victim of some horrific right wing ideology that would make Hitler's crimes against humanity look like a summer picnic...
Climate sceptics were inviting certai
Climate sceptics were inviting certain doom.
He then cited, among other things, a Newsweek article from 1975 (whose author recently lamented the way
climate change deniers use his work), archaeological evidence, and Scriptures, in addition to the snowball, as evidence that refutes the
claim that «somehow man is so important that he can
change [the
climate].»
These groups and individuals — all of them residing on the far left of the political spectrum —
claim Exxon - Mobil knew fossil fuels could cause catastrophic
climate change but paid think tanks and advocacy groups to «
deny» the truth in order to protect the company's profits.
The mailer began with a letter from
climate change denier John Coleman, who
claimed that
climate change is not a threat: [76]
It has always been defended on that tired old notion that the debate about
climate policy divides on the fact of
climate change, between scientists who
claim «
climate change is real» and
deniers who
claim the opposite.
This statement at one time
denied the urgent need to act on
climate change; a need on which all clear - thinking people in the world agree, and is a contradiction of the
claims commonly made by wind farm opponents who make statements such as:
Watch Inhofe, who
claims climate change is the «greatest hoax ever perpetrated,» call all sorts of hearings around the issue of
climate change and embolden like - minded conspiracy theorists and
deniers - for - hire.
While Edelman's president, Richard Edelman, has written in support of addressing
climate change, [15] and has
claimed that «We do not accept clients that seek to
deny climate change,» [16] the company continued to represent at least three
climate change deniers as of August 2014: the API, E.ON, and ALEC.
«It would seem that Richard Muller has served as a useful foil for the Koch Brothers, allowing them to
claim they have funded a real scientist looking into the basic science, while that scientist — Muller — props himself up by using the «Berkeley» imprimatur (U.C. Berkeley has not in any way sanctioned this effort) and appearing to accept the basic science, and goes out on the talk circuit, writing Op - Eds, etc. systematically downplaying the actual state of the science, dismissing key
climate -
change impacts and
denying the degree of risk that
climate change actually represents.
Fellow
climate change denier and journalist Gunter Ederer wrote a piece (German)
claiming that there had been «massive alterations» to NASA temperature data, citing analysis by Friedrich - Karl Ewert as evidence (as reported by the skeptical blog NoTricksZone): [3], [4]
When
climate deniers want to
change the subject away from the warm temperatures we're experiencing now, they sometimes
claim it was warmer in Medieval times.
VANCOUVER, B.C. (CN)-- A Pennsylvania State University professor
claims climate -
change denier Timothy Ball defamed him in an interview published by the Frontier -LSB-...]
The consequence of the consensus without an object is that the debate is presented as one between «scientists» and «
deniers», attached to the
claims «
climate change is happening» and «
climate change is not happening» respectively.
At the time that he
denied the waiver (acting against the better advice of his staff, which had strongly urged him to grant it), Johnson
claimed that California's law was unnecessary because of the recently enacted energy bill, which would do more to mitigate
climate change than «a confusing patchwork of state rules» — this despite the fact that 13 other states, representing about half of the country's drivers, were also on board with the plan.
His story was picked up by hundreds of other
climate change deniers, some of whom went so far as to
claim that it destroyed global warming theory.
Both
climate -
change deniers and
climate -
change alarmists are wrong on their
claims about the implications of this [Northern Hemisphere] winter and how they interpret the behaviour of the earth's climatic system over the past 2000 years.
One of the ironies in the public «debate» — I use scare quotes since what is transpiring is not a true debate, but rather a competition between an organized disinformation campaign to
deny the reality of
climate change, and a counter effort to provide a more realistic picture — is that the IPCC is constantly accused of «alarmism,» and is consciously, intentionally, and consistently conservative in their
claims.
Limbaugh, who frequently attempts to
deny climate change, concluded his segment by
claiming that he was helping Brown get his message out: «We've gotten your message out for 25 years, the message that there isn't any warming, and there isn't in the specifically past 18 years.