Not exact matches
Reviews of
geoengineering techniques for
climate control have emphasised that they are not substitutes for emission controls and have identified potentially stronger and weaker
schemes.
Alarmed by the lack of progress by governments in finding ways to slow emissions of CO2,
climate researchers have begun to examine so - called
geoengineering schemes (ScienceNOW, 9 November 2007).
Of course, the craziest
geoengineering scheme to date is the one we're already doing: changing the
climate with an excess of greenhouse gas emissions.
In addition, a wide range of forcing
schemes designed to span the approximate range of uncertainties associated with anthropogenic
climate forcing estimates were generated and implemented in order to assess what differences in effects exist between the «best guess» counter-anthropogenic
geoengineering forcing
scheme and other plausible
schemes.
«I hope we'll never need
geoengineering schemes, but if a
climate catastrophe occurs, I sure hope we will have thought through our options carefully.»
See generally articles citing Bala: Problems with
geoengineering schemes to combat
climate change
One also has to wonder whether the international treaties and organizations needed to agree on and execute a
geoengineering scheme are significantly easier to realize than the agreements needed to decarbonize the energy future, which would offer safer and more durable
climate protection.
Geoengineering schemes need ranking system to avoid wasting money, destroying the planet (10/26/2008) Schemes to alter Earth's climate on a planetary scale should be ranked according to their efficacy, cost, risks and their rate of mitigation, argues a new editorial published in Nature Geos
schemes need ranking system to avoid wasting money, destroying the planet (10/26/2008)
Schemes to alter Earth's climate on a planetary scale should be ranked according to their efficacy, cost, risks and their rate of mitigation, argues a new editorial published in Nature Geos
Schemes to alter Earth's
climate on a planetary scale should be ranked according to their efficacy, cost, risks and their rate of mitigation, argues a new editorial published in Nature Geoscience.
(01/28/2009) The first comprehensive assessment of the
climate cooling potential of different
geoengineering schemes has been conducted by researchers at the University of East Anglia (UEA).
Aerosol injections are the most prominent solar
geoengineering scheme, and a tempting one: at under $ 10 billion annually the estimated direct costs are low when compared to the trillions of dollars in
climate damages they might help to offset.
Geoengineering schemes are floated as quick turnaround fixes to the accelerating
climate change we face.
«My preference is for experiments that have broad utility, both for understanding proposed solar
geoengineering schemes and improving our understanding of the natural
climate system,» says Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science in Stanford, California.
Geoengineering schemes are projects designed to tackle the effects of
climate change directly, usually by removing CO2 from the air or limiting the amount of sunlight reaching the planet's surface.
Such grand
schemes for «
geoengineering» our way out of the
climate crisis appeal to the dreamer in us all.
Of course succesful [and continued for as long as CO2 remains elevated] implementation of such
geoengineering schemes is almost equally theoretical as switching your CO2
climate model to reverse.
The powerful wealthy Neoliberal Cult (who currently run the world) have a full spectrum response to AGW / CC... it includes carbon trading
schemes and the Paris
Climate Agreement and
Geoengineering fictions.