Not exact matches
Discussion of
climate change impacts on Montana's water (Chapter 3), forests (Chapter 4), and agriculture (Chapter 5) are
presented next.
The AOCC kicked off on Friday, March 3, and featured several panel
discussions, as well as the Youth Action Research where Boston Public School students
presented information, including survey data, about their schools» racial and social
climate.
These lessons
present close reading, writing,
discussion and hands - on activities that explore reporting on
climate change, land rights debates and water issues.
In 2012, with the support of an Artistic Innovation and Collaboration grant from the Robert Rauschenberg Foundation, the second Marfa Dialogues program considered the science and culture of
climate change, with Michael Pollan, Rebecca Solnit and Dr. Diana Liverman leading
discussions concurrently with Carbon 13, a visual arts exhibition curated by David Buckland of Cape Farewell and
presented at Ballroom Marfa.
In 2012, with the support of an AIC grant from the Robert Rauschenberg Foundation, the second Marfa Dialogues program considered the science and culture of
climate change, with Michael Pollan, Rebecca Solnit and Dr. Diana Liverman leading
discussions concurrently with Carbon 13, a visual arts exhibition curated by David Buckland of Cape Farewell and
presented at Ballroom Marfa.
In partnership with Marfa Dialogues / NY, Creative Time Reports
presents a panel
discussion on how culture can help visualize the impact of
climate change with artist Maya Lin, Natural Resources Defense Council President Frances Beinecke and Creative Time President and Artistic Director Anne Pasternak.
Now the Robert Rauschenberg Foundation, which he set up to provide support for causes that were important to him, is joining forces with two other like - minded organizations to
present a series of exhibitions, panel
discussions and performances that will explore
climate change.
This panel
discussion will address questions of how artists use digital technology to mark current conditions and evoke uncertain futures — How can we make future
climate change seem real to the
present?
Going down this path, you'll quickly find yourself in a debate on discounting and the time value of action / resources, which will take you deep into
discussions of subjects such as environmental ethics, future /
present generations, the foundational assumtions of the discipline of economics, etc. — all very important and interesting subjects, but ones on which there is unlikely to be forged a new consensus on meaningful time scales related to
climate change.
The thrust of the
present discussion, and most
discussions I have seen related to
climate change, is the effect of
climate on weather.
I also think that a few critical points on the nature of short - term and long - term chaos in the
climate system have been lost in the
present rambling
discussion, and I hope to provide a little focus below.
Discussion about the «hockey stick» is conducted with considerable fervor in the public media, where this curve is often
presented as if it were a proof, or even the most important proof, of anthropogenic influence on
climate.
The relative contributions of atmospheric long ‐ wave absorbers to the
present ‐ day global greenhouse effect are among the most misquoted statistics in public
discussions of
climate change.
Public
discussions of
climate change most often
present religion as an obstacle, and there are certainly those who use religion to argue that
climate change can not be happening, is not anthropogenically - caused, or does not require urgent response.
Concerning the role of active scientists and skeptics in the
present climate discussion, the paradoxical thing is that a very large part of scientists subscribe the first model of thinking.
Dr. Curry, there is a concerted effort to trash you underway at
present, led by some really unscrupulous actors who have honed their craft on lesser figures participating in the blogosphere
discussion on
climate issues.
I believe that the cultural cognition of
present day
climate change
discussions can not be conducted without understanding of how these underlying philosophies affect modern attitudes.
«The 19th Century
Discussion of
Climate Variability and
Climate Change: Analogies for
Present Debate?»
Finally, some recommendations for correctly communicating uncertainty in
climate information were given, such as considering user expertise in order to not
present information in a way that could be falsely interpreted as deterministic, or the need to develop a highly tailored communication using an iterative
discussion process with users.
This analytical document
presents that OHCHR organized a panel
discussion on the impacts of
climate change on the right to health during the 31st Session of the Human Rights Council.
This paper first
presents the background to and context of current
discussions and approaches surrounding
climate change - related human mobility across borders (Part 1) before identifying the normative gaps in the
present international protection regime together with institutional and operational shortcomings (Part 2).
The document
presents the outcomes of COP15, their implications and the technical bases for an international agreement on
climate change, followed by a
discussion on greenhouse gas emissions in Latin America and the Caribbean.
My challenge to Bart (and Jason if he comes back into the
discussion) is to
present their precise definition of what should be the formal tests of skill for multi-decadal
climate projections.
Hey here's an idea — let's become mutual fans of the outstanding
discussions of
climate - science that are
presented on Neven's Sea Ice weblog!
As a part of this event, the Pacific
Climate Impacts Consortium (PCIC) and the Pacific Institute for
Climate Solutions (PICS) are
presenting a panel
discussion on hydro - climatic change in BC.
In public
discussion, scientific publications, political debate and economic analysis alike,
climate engineering is always
presented in a certain way which alleviates the importance of some aspects of it and neglects others —
climate engineering is framed.
The report organizes the
discussion of these strengths and limitations around a series of questions, including: What are the major components and processes of the
climate system that are included in
present state - of - the - art
climate models?
Part IV: «
Climate Change and Water: Rights and Runoff»
presents Donald Bren Distinguished Professor of Corporate Environmental Management Gary Libecap and Assistant Professor of Hydrology Christina Tague in a
discussion about the complexities of managing the ever - increasing demands placed on scarce water resources.
«I (William: The Obama administration of course means all fellow warmists do not have patience for scientific
discussion as the warmists can not win the argument based on science) don't have much patience for people who deny (William: deny in this context means to
present facts that disprove the faulty hypothesis)
climate change.»
Whereas Working Group I lays out our current best understanding of the physical science basis of
climate science and Working Group II details potential
climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, Working Group III
presents a comprehensive, objective and policy - neutral
discussion of
climate change mitigation.
An excellent
discussion of the most serious
climate change issue our generation is likely to face, the threat of increased drought and reduced water supplies, is
presented.
The relative contributions of atmospheric long - wave absorbers to the
present - day global greenhouse effect are among the most misquoted statistics in public
discussions of
climate change.
But whether or not parts of Greenland were greener in the past is irrelevant to our
present discussion of manmade
climate change.
In January 2009 Cape Farewell
presented a day of
discussion and artworks as part of a
climate event Burning Ice - Art & Climate Change at the Kaai Theatre in Brussels, with artists David Buckland, Heather Ackroyd and Dan Harvey discussing questions posed by the artistic director of the Kaai Theatre Guy G
climate event Burning Ice - Art &
Climate Change at the Kaai Theatre in Brussels, with artists David Buckland, Heather Ackroyd and Dan Harvey discussing questions posed by the artistic director of the Kaai Theatre Guy G
Climate Change at the Kaai Theatre in Brussels, with artists David Buckland, Heather Ackroyd and Dan Harvey discussing questions posed by the artistic director of the Kaai Theatre Guy Gypsens.
It
presents a
discussion on the impact of
climate change on agriculture and smallholders farmers.
The
present state of the
climate discussion might leave one with a yen to pull the wings off politics.
Just last week on Earth Day we announced our newest
discussion course, Change Is Our Choice: Creating
Climate Solutions, which will be
presented as an interactive ebook — coming your way at the end of May!
This book
presents summaries of
discussions at the workshop, which included sessions on the measurements and sensors originally planned for NPOESS and GOES - R; generation of
climate data records; mitigation options, including the role of international partners; and cross-cutting issues.
I am particularly grateful to Professors David Douglass and Robert Knox for having patiently answered many questions over several weeks, and for having allowed me to
present a seminar on some of these ideas to a challenging audience in the Physics Faculty at Rochester University, New York; to Dr. David Evans for his assistance with temperature feedbacks; to Professor Felix Fitzroy of the University of St. Andrews for some vigorous
discussions; to Professor Larry Gould and Dr. Walter Harrison for having given me the opportunity to
present some of the data and conclusions on radiative transfer and
climate sensitivity at a kindly - received public lecture at Hartford University, Connecticut; to Dr. Joanna Haigh of Imperial College, London, for having supplied a crucial piece of the argument; to Professor Richard Lindzen of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for his lecture - notes and advice on the implications of the absence of the tropical mid-troposphere «hot - spot» for
climate sensitivity; to Dr. Willie Soon of the Harvard Center for Astrophysics for having given much useful advice and for having traced several papers that were not easily obtained; and to Dr. Roy Spencer of the University of Alabama at Huntsville for having answered several questions in connection with satellite data.
This January Cape Farewell
present a day of
discussion and artworks as part of a
climate event at the Kaai Theatre,...»
I hesitate, in the
present climate on twitter, to mention this — but Carl Gardner did a podcast with me some days before David Allen Green did his New Statesman piece and we drew on a number of sources in the
discussion.
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AEDE, Liberia • South Africa 2007 —
Present Deputy Executive Director Manage project approval documentation and project studies completed by staff an outside consultants and partner in focus group
discussion for SMEs development studies regarding
climate change resilience and gender mainstream workshops for complex $ 2.25 MM agricultural project in Liberia West Africa for 2,000 farmers focused on commercial value chain for SMEs.
The
present research examined in how far a positive social - emotional classroom
climate, namely perceptions of community in class and fairness of teachers, furthers students» democratic experiences in school (i.e., open classroom
climate for
discussion, opportunities to participate in school decisions).