Sentences with phrase «climate science research often»

BOULDER, Colo. — Climate science research often involves a little derring - do mixed in with a lot of tedium.

Not exact matches

When compared to other religious groups, Evangelicals have often been more wary of science as evidenced in debates about evolution, stem cell research, and climate change.

However, the strong evidence that supports the climate science and human causation of climate change doesn't warrant equal weight with minority claims, often disputed by other research, that are not credible, they add.

In recent years, a brand of research called «climate attribution science» has sprouted from this question, examining the impact of extreme events to determine how much — often in fractional terms — is related to human - induced climate change, and how much to natural variability (whether in climate patterns such as the El Niño / La Niña - Southern Oscillation, sea - surface temperatures, changes in incoming solar radiation, or a host of other possible factors).

Basic research lays the groundwork for future scientific and technological development and it often addresses society's largest challenges such as mitigating climate change, curbing antibiotic resistance or preventing terrorism, said Maria Zuber, chair of the National Science Board and the E. A. Griswold Professor of Geophysics and vice president for research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, during a monthly colloquium lecture on Wednesday at AAAS headquarters.

Dr Rebecca Nadin, Director of the British Council's Climate and Sustainability project who contributed research to the study, said: «Journalists and other key communicators often lack the knowledge base, skills and online and offline resources to cut thought the confusion and accurately report on the complex science of climate change and this can be especially true in developing couClimate and Sustainability project who contributed research to the study, said: «Journalists and other key communicators often lack the knowledge base, skills and online and offline resources to cut thought the confusion and accurately report on the complex science of climate change and this can be especially true in developing couclimate change and this can be especially true in developing countries.

Too often the climate «debate» is reported in the media as equal between a few who challenge the science and a much larger number whose research supports current climate theory and predictions linking greenhouse warming with increasing emissions.

In stark contrast to the often repeated assertion that the science of climate change is «settled,» significant new peer - reviewed research has cast even more doubt on the hypothesis of dangerous human - caused global warming.

As is often the case, scientific research again confirms that the dogmatic consensus climate science, such as the «expert» prediction that the globe's biosphere would suffer great harm from anthropogenic CO2, has proven to be spectacularly wrong.

We often see scientists from non-climate fields who believe they have sufficient expertise to understand climate science despite having done minimal research on the subject; William Happer, Fritz Vahrenholt, and Bob Carter, for example.

We have shared our research and insights with the IPCC since its inception, and our scientists worked alongside the IPCC, often serving as authors for each of the organization's climate science assessments.

Bob Ludwick, quoting Gary M: I have observed, year in and year out, that ALL of the «research» conducted by climate scientists funded by governments / (green) foundations is focused laser like on producing «data», often tortured to the extreme, that will support the original «settled science» and / or DISCREDIT any data collected by anyone OTHER than those supported by governments / foundations.

I have observed, year in and year out, that ALL of the «research» conducted by climate scientists funded by governments / (green) foundations is focused laser like on producing «data», often tortured to the extreme, that will support the original «settled science» and / or DISCREDIT any data collected by anyone OTHER than those supported by governments / foundations.