Sentences with phrase «club owners do»
the Wengers tranfer market policy not working he making money for himself the clubs owners he does nt worry about trophys anymore or the Arsenal fans who spend big money into buying tickets to Arsenals revenue.
http://www.justarsenal.com/ Not exact matches
If Beyoncé does invest in the Rockets she'll join a growing list of celebrities and entertainers who hold ownership stakes in sports teams, including Memphis Grizzlies part - owner Justin Timberlake, Miami Dolphins investment group members Jennifer Lopez, Venus and Serena Williams and Will Ferrell, who owns a stake in Major League Soccer's Los Angeles Football Club.
Intermediaries trying to find a buyer for the Premier League club from the controversial ownership of Tom Hicks and George Gillett approached Gates and Robert Kraft, owner of the New England Patriots who last weekend won a fifth NFL Super Bowl under his stewardship, but did not receive take - up from either.
The club's owner is angered by Jimmy Steinway's sneaking in advertising executives because he «doesn't want that element in the club.»
What they didn't account for was multi billionaire owners investing in clubs and making the money made from gate receipts basically mil and void.
Wenger needs to start understanding that a club with money and owners who actually want success, will do anything it takes to achieve the latter.
In an ideal world, we had a strong owner or a strong board or a strong GM, who would take Wenger aside and say: «You have had a great career and the club will be forever grateful for not only the job you have done but also for the manner in which you did it.
However unfortunately our owner who doesn't give a dam about the club only in taking money out loves Wenger, so it looks like we're stuck with him until he draws his last breath.
Let us face facts, we have been a huge club since the 1930s but til the last ten years or so I was always proud to be a Gunner (these days, known as a Gooner) but our club is being raped by a money mad owner, fool of a manager, puppet board and the likes of Walcott and let's be frank with each other, Ozil too who must «don't like it up em», to quote Dads Army.
I highly doubt any of the high flying managers mentioned will come to Arsenal with him around, who would want to come to a club whose owner doesn't want footballing success?
i wonder if Stan is ready to sell and is no longer investing in the club, in that case in coming owners have a lot to do,
The whole club, as well as the fans, should all suffer, purely because of our owners antics that don't even involve football?
I fear the day when he finally does leave the club, as I'm not sure any other coach could keep us challenging for honours like we are whilst sticking to the budgets of the current owners.
If your answer is YES, then the only problem here is the owner who has not sack Wenger because he obviously love what the man (Wenger) is doing for him... making money like we did this summer making a profit on transfers when other clubs were spending lots of money upgrading their teams.
Though Man United do not have Champions League action to offer Vidal in 2014/15 he will have been impressed with the club's drive to enter a new era, post Sir Alex Ferguson, with the club's owners keen to repair the damage suffered during David Moyes's brief reign.
As long as we don't have a owner willing to invest in big money into the team, then there's very slim chance the club can compete because you already are losing at the race's starting line before it even begins.
There is money in the club but the owner, board, Gazidis, Wenger just don't want to spend it.
If we do get new investment and owners who actually back his decisions then I think it better to keep the Spaniard at the club rather than changing both the board and manager at the same time.
We may all as well Get used to falling down the table The owner doesn't care, if he doesn't give a shot about clubs in his own country he won't give a sh # t about Arsenal There's only 3 ways of attracting BIG players to your club Champions League NO offer them silly money Nope that's not happening Or a Top manage errr
We aren't in the good position we are told we are in and while some will disagree I personally believe the blame lays firmly with Arsene Wenger, if he was doing his job we wouldn't even notice the owner and the board, they are a disgrace to our club but they do not pick the players to play or buy nor coach the team.
If we had a rich owner who was happy to put more money in the club things would be different but Kroenke only takes money out he doesn't put any in (or so it seems).
But if we really want to force regime change from owner, bpoard and manager, as I do, we need our club to finish as low as possible, to damage Kroenkes investment and make a sale of club to an honourable owner more likely, so a Liverpool win is then best.
As far as the club's financials show, the man has only respected the club's tradition / philosophy of self sustainability and that's his offense as we all have been spoilt by other clubs» billionaire / State - aid owners distorting the finances with decisions which don't make economic sense and which create unfair competition.
How terribly sad... we have fallen so far that we find ourselves in the ridiculous position of propping up the oft - injured and rarely inspirational Jack Wiltshire... what's next, extending Walcott, Welbeck and Ramsey... can't you see that these players have nothing to do with winning and all to do with providing recognizable names to the plastic fans who frequent our overgrown library of a stadium... it's high time we rid this club of one of the worlds most incompetent and unsuccessful owners (look it up) and our fragile and spineless manager (much like our club) who can't bring in the best talent because he knows he can't live up to expectations that come with players of that ilk... think about it, he couldn't even handle Sanchez, who was largely a periphery character in Barcelona
He is not the outright owner of Arsenal Football Club but the American businessman Enos Stanley Kroenke or silent Stan as we know him best does hold a controlling stake as he is the majority shareholder with almost 63 percent of the shares.
Until the Owner of the Club is outed and the board changed then Wenger will remain like he has done for season after season of substandard incompetent management.
I don't think any ambitious footballer will join a club whose owner openly said he is not interested in trophies.
They are stable and do not throw money at the club, however, due to earlier success and consequent merchandising, United have enough money to dominate EPL without extra funds from the owners.
If the board and owner don't wise up soon our great club will become a complete laughing stock!
I was never try to insinuate that it's year 2000 in terms of spending and all that.Look at all the clubs you mentioned.They were Man Utd, Chelsea, Man wateva, PSG and Real Madrid.Arsenal has nothing on them when it comes to money for transfers.The majority of these clubs also chalk a lot of success or have very wealthy owners who own a higher percentage of shares which adds to the money already available for transfers.If they want to spend extravagantly let them do but not Arsenal.We must not compare ourselves to them in terms of spending.Lemar is a good player and I like him very much but he's just not worth # 80.
Fraud owners like Kroenke and sham CEO»S like Gazidis must love delusional fans like you, so they can keep lying to us, doing nothing, spending practically nothing and keep silly fans like you on side, with their current absence of forward planning and «hope for the best, as long as most fans are still fooled» incompetance and fraudulent running of our once highly honourable club.
What is the point calling yourself a supporter or a fan, when all you do is moan about the club, manager, players, board, owner, price of season tickets, price of shirt, flat beer, lack of atmosphere.
I will always despise kroenke for being an absentee owner who doesn't care about the sporting side of arsenal only the financial aspect, I still wonder why Wenger didn't leave all these years if the board are so terrible like some claim, yet he is still here getting pay raises If the board has been hindering the club's success by not providing funds, why hasn't the manager left?
Good idea, if we don't fight for our rights, who would fight for us.boycott is the only solution.I wonder those buying tickets estimated 1billion bound a year, without having any respect from the club owners
Storrie is currently a consultant at the debt - ladened club, and he said: «I love the game, and you never know what the new owners will want to do.
Something else is going on here which I think has got more to do with our greedy owner than with Wenger.I might be wrong but I seriously can't beleive any sensible club owner will risk missing out on a deal for aubameyang cos of less than 10 millions, how much more a club in dire need like ours.this should have been the most straightforward transfer in this windows but these bunch of d ** k heads are messing it all up.
it wont change till Silent stan is bought out or Wenger walks or the board start thinking like football club owners rather than investment bankers, which most of them are or were in former lives so don't expect any changes anytime soon.
The only reason why Man City and Chelsea have won the league recently and been doing slightly better than Arsenal, is because they have super rich owners who have pumped bottomless pits of money into their clubs.
You just said Brendan Rodgers spent # 200m in the last 2 transfers widow, and he did not meet the high expectations of the owners of Liverpool FC and thus got the sack for squandering the club's financial resources on transfers without matching it with the commensurate results on the field of play.
• Gene Autry, part owner of the Los Angeles Angels baseball club, when asked about the Angels» schedule in «Dodger Stadium»: «I don't know where that is.
The thing is it doesn't matter how best Wenger knows things these days as he is pitted against very wealthy and powerful club owners who's ruthlessness is second nature.
I except that after 21 years we need a new manager, but with the current owners and people running the club, will any other manager actually do better at Arsenal.
Nobody's going to defend tax evasion here, but dabbling in it on a personal level doesn't really mean you're going to be a bad owner of a football club.
why did we sign flamini - he was free, sanogo he was free, podolski free.all these are deadwoods and the reasons we did nt get Dm & striker.I remember wenger say sanogo will make headlines on the pitch, sign cheap players save money for club owners in the bank remain remain just relevant in competitions - thats wengers policy
This might surprise a few of you but when you combine, an owner who doesn't want the club, a manager who the fans want out and Roy Keane hovering, then that's a recipe for disaster.
They are one point above the relegation zone before the round starts and if you are the owner of the club who, despite unlikely, still is the champions of England, what would you do?
The problem is deeper than Wenger — just imagine if the Arsenal directors would have sold to the Manchester City owners — they did offer ot buy the club — but our mb chose the yank instead.
why not take a more pragmatic approach like the manchester united and liverpool supporters did against their club owners?
Is it supposed to be some compare and contrast statement to hold up against football clubs that are not businesses and where owners don't dictate, like say.......
But now that Pardew has left Newcastle to take charge at Crystal Palace, who knows what the club's owner Mike Ashley might do.