Not exact matches
As the Washington Post
reported, natural gas is overtaking
coal as the fossil fuel of choice for
electricity generation — the
report forecasts that by 2019,
coal will provide 28 % of US
electricity, whereas natural gas will make up 34 %.
The Alberta government received the final
report from the independent panel led by University of Alberta economics professor Andrew Leach and announced its plans to phase out
coal burning
electricity plants, phase in a price on carbon, introduce a limit on overall emissions from the oil sands and introduce an energy efficiency strategy.
Prices for
electricity would be 4 percent lower by 2033 with a transition to more wind, solar and hydroelectric power than a persistent reliance on
coal and natural gas, according to a
report by Calgary - based environmental research firm Pembina Institute and Clean Energy Canada, a Vancouver - based organization that promotes renewable energy.
Edmonton Journal: «Alberta needs to kick its
coal habit, says
report:
Electricity generation from other sources would cut greenhouse gases»
Most of that
coal is being burned to generate
electricity, which replaces oil as the primary carrier of the world's energy by 2050 in the
report's low - emissions scenario.
In short, the
report finds that
coal will remain the
electricity - generation king and geologic sequestration is the solution best suited to minimize the attendant carbon dioxide pollution.
According to a
report from the Energy Information Administration,
coal is expected to generate 39 percent of the nation's
electricity in 2035, despite a decline from its current level of 45 percent.
Coal - based
electricity was historically cheap in India, but is now getting more expensive, National Geographic
reported.
Eliminating this financial risk premium makes nuclear power levelized
electricity cost competitive with that of
coal, and it becomes lower than that of
coal when a modest price on carbon dioxide emissions is imposed,» the
report says.
The warmest winter on record — driven by climate change — is also driving down the need for wintertime
electricity required for home heating, which drives down the need for more
coal, IEEFA analyst Seth Feaster said in the
report.
An important question that political and climate analysts will be examining is how much bite is in the regulations — meaning how much they would curb emissions beyond what's already happening to cut power plant carbon dioxide thanks to the natural gas boom, the shutdown of old
coal - burning plants because of impending mercury - cutting rules (read the valuable Union of Concerned Scientists «Ripe for Retirement»
report for more on this), improved energy efficiency and state mandates developing renewable
electricity supplies.
Eighty - two percent of its
electricity is derived from
coal, almost all of which is imported from Wyoming, 24/7 Wall Street
reports.
The 2016 version of Stacy and Taylor's
report similarly claimed ``...
electricity from new wind and solar power is 2.5 to 5 times more expensive than
electricity from existing
coal and nuclear power.»
The CO2 Scorecard
report, by contrast, examined changes in
electricity at the regional level using data from grid operators, which showed researchers greater detail about where natural gas had replaced
coal or renewables; where renewables replaced
coal; and where
electricity consumption simply declined because of reduced demand.
Of the country's 6,000
coal, oil, natural gas, nuclear, wind, and solar electric - generating facilities, a small sub-group of mostly
coal - fired power generators produces more than its share of the nation's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions compared with the
electricity it produces, the
report found.
«Our study shows that on average,
electricity from new wind resources is nearly four times more expensive than from existing nuclear and nearly three times more expensive than from existing
coal,» according to a summary of Stacy and Taylor's 2015
report found on IER's website.
The cost of production of
electricity through utilization of solar energy is outpacing other alternatives as the cost accrued in investing in the installation of solar panels is turning out to be comparatively cheaper than a comparable investment in
coal, natural gas or other options, according to a new World Economic Forum (WEF)
report.
Public statements, company
reports and press coverage all point to a shift from
coal - fired
electricity generation to renewables at Reliance.
[iii] Toronto Sun, Shutdown of
coal plants raised
electricity rates, failed to reduce pollution:
Report, January 17, 2017, http://m.torontosun.com/2017/01/17/shutdown-of-
coal-plants-raised-
electricity-rates-failed-to-reduce-pollution-
report
This brings us back to the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) and its latest
report, titled: «The life saving potential of
coal: How Australian
coal could help 82 million Indians access
electricity».
In the long run, according to the
report, the steady demand for
electricity is likely to result in investments in much cleaner power plants, even if
coal remains the dominant fuel for our
electricity production.
The
report includes a new emissions forecast: Oregon will miss its 2020 target, and is not on track for its 2035 and 2050 goals, even with an updated Renewable Portfolio Standard and phase - out of
coal - produced
electricity.
A December
report from the North American Electric Reliability Corp. (NERC) said U.S. power generation from renewable sources, along with natural gas, would produce enough
electricity to offset retirements of U.S.
coal and nuclear units over the next 10 years.
«For both nations to achieve the same per capita
electricity use as the European Union, for instance, they would need the equivalent of 7 billion tons of
coal each year, approximately the world's current use,» he wrote in the company's 2010 annual
report.
From September 1 through November 5, for example, the American Coalition for Clean
Coal Electricity and the American Petroleum Institute spent $ 5.5 million on these types of ads, Climate Progress
reported.
Both The Globe and Mail and The New York Times are
reporting on recent comments from Jim Prentice, Canada's minister of the environment, about phasing out
coal - fired
electricity in Canada:
The same IEA
report compares
coal and oil's current 46 per cent share of global
electricity generation to what it would be in 2030 under the 2 °C degree scenario.
«Air pollution and climate change policies are pushing
coal - fired
electricity stations to the brink, says a new
report.
According to a River Network
report in June,
electricity production by
coal, nuclear and natural gas power plants is the fastest - growing use of freshwater in the U.S., accounting for more than half of all fresh, surface water withdrawals from rivers.
Just released Australian Government AETA
report gives estimates of capital costs for new
electricity plants in Australia (The ratios are roughly similar in US): Wind = $ 2530 / kW
Coal = $ 3124 / kW Nuclear = $ 3470 / kW AETA (2102), Table 5.2.2, p87, http://bree.gov.au/documents/publications/Australian-Energy-Technology-Assessment.pdf
This number fluctuates largely between
reporting years since it is a function of the source of
electricity (
Coal, Hydro, Nuclear, etc.) that comprised the actual grid mix during the year.
The
report's findings are in stark contrast to the views of the global
coal industry, whose biggest publicly traded company Peabody Energy Corp, maintains
coal is «essential to meet the scale of Africa's desperate need for
electricity.»
As a recent
report by the Carbon Tracker Initiative highlights, grid costs become prohibitive for
coal in rural areas when the investment needed to build a thermal power plant is combined with the cost of building
electricity grid extensions and importing fuel.
In January 2008, the Washington Post
reported that ABEC «is waging a $ 35 million campaign in primary and caucus states to rally public support for
coal - fired
electricity and to fuel opposition to legislation that Congress is crafting to slow climate change.»
5 Aug: Australian: Sid Maher: Land for carbon reforestation to take big cut But if the carbon price started at $ 47 a tonne, under a more ambitious scenario, the
report estimates more than 60 million tonnes of carbon could be shed through plantation forests and carbon plantings by 2021... The modelling was released as Resources Minister Martin Ferguson named three leading corporate advisory firms to help the Gillard government negotiate a billion - dollar closure of a brown -
coal electricity generator as it seeks to cut carbon emissions.
(46) A
report by the Michigan Environmental Council (1999) states... «There is a disconnect between «clean»
electricity and the dirty
coal used to generate the majority of our
electricity in Michigan....
In the years prior to 1985, several publications
reported the scientific consensus that acid rain emitted by
coal - fired
electricity generation plants belching sulfur dioxide was destroying vast swathes of forests and lakes in the eastern United States.
A spokeswoman at the American Coalition for Clean
Coal Electricity, the coal industry's main lobbying arm, did not have an immediate comment about the rep
Coal Electricity, the
coal industry's main lobbying arm, did not have an immediate comment about the rep
coal industry's main lobbying arm, did not have an immediate comment about the
report.
Nearly $ 1 trillion (# 700bn) is being invested in new
coal - fired power plants worldwide despite the fact that the demand for
electricity generated from
coal has declined for two years in a row, shows a new
report released today.
This
report considers the various direct and indirect land requirements for
coal, natural gas, nuclear, hydro, wind, and solar
electricity generation in the United States in 2015.
Electricity can be supplied from a new wind farm in Australia at a cost of A$ 80 ($ 84) per megawatt hour, compared with A$ 143 a megawatt hour from a new
coal - fired power plant or A$ 116 from a new station powered by natural gas when the cost of carbon emissions is included, according to a Bloomberg New Energy Finance
report.
«The efficiency of converting
coal into
electricity matters: more efficient power plants use less fuel and emit less climate - damaging carbon dioxide,» wrote the authors of the International Energy Agency
report on measuring
coal plant performance.
The
report estimated that regulations cutting emissions of mercury, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides would lead to the «premature» retirements of
coal - fired power plants that can generate 47.8 gigawatts of
electricity, about 15 percent of
coal's U.S. production capacity.
SPAIN has business leakage, California has banned all
coal - based
electricity, cap and trade creates vested interests in property rights — these are some of the issues economist Alan Moran
reports on in his summary of the recent Climate Change Conference in New York.
The
report, Wind Vision, offers a lofty goal: wind energy could supply 35 percent of U.S.
electricity by 2050 (for context, wind currently supplies 4.5 percent and
coal is our largest
electricity source at 39 percent).
«Texas Decision Could Double Wind Power Capacity in the U.S.,» Renewable Energy Access, 4 October 2007;
coal - fired power plant equivalents calculated by assuming that an average plant has a 500 - megawatt capacity and operates 72 percent of the time, generating 3.15 billion kilowatt - hours of
electricity per year; an average wind turbine operates 36 percent of the time; Iceland geothermal usage from Iceland National Energy Authority and Ministries of Industry and Commerce, Geothermal Development and Research in Iceland (Reykjavik, Iceland: April 2006), p. 16; European per person consumption from European Wind Energy Association (EWEA), «Wind Power on Course to Become Major European Energy Source by the End of the Decade,» press release (Brussels: 22 November 2004); China's solar water heaters calculated from Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21), Renewables Global Status
Report, 2006 Update (Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute, 2006), p. 21, and from Bingham Kennedy, Jr., Dissecting China's 2000 Census (Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau, June 2001); Philippines from Geothermal Energy Association (GEA), «World Geothermal Power Up 50 %, New US Boom Possible,» press release (Washington, DC: 11 April 2002).
For example, it won't suprise anyone that an investigation of the internet's energy use by the American Coalition for Clean
Coal Electricity sees much higher electricity consumption than a report written by the information and communication technology indus
Electricity sees much higher
electricity consumption than a report written by the information and communication technology indus
electricity consumption than a
report written by the information and communication technology industry itself.
Consequently, the research
report calls for action: (1) to reform
electricity markets so that low cost renewables are dispatched first; (2) to extend robust moratoriums on new
coal power plants; (3) to cap longer - term
coal consumption and emissions in the power sector in the context of carbon markets.
(The
report profiles
electricity production and opportunities for saving power in 24 of those states — all except Virginia, which, though it imports a lot of foreign
coal, is not a net
coal importer).
China's six percent jump in
electricity demand was met by
coal, IEA
reported.