Sentences with phrase «cochrane review of the studies»

A Cochrane Review of studies showed that «no experimental studies unequivocally demonstrated the effectiveness of AA» in treating alcoholism.

A Cochrane Review of the studies of external version has found that use of the tocolytic improves the success of turning the baby.

According to one Cochrane review of studies the evidence for recommendation to change sugar intake to prevent caries is poor [38].

Not exact matches

A Cochrane's «studies» Review where you quoted Don stating «no experimental studies unequivocally demonstrated the effectiveness of AA» The Use of a double negative in use of your quotation dares to show that «experimental studies» have not bore out any negative nor positive conclusion what - so - ever!

The results of a Cochrane review will be presented, along with a discussion of what was learned about such studies in the process.

Based on a review of 30 studies and 1925 babies a Cochrane Review concluded that skin to skin contact after birth enabled babies to interact more with their mothers, stay warmer, cry less are more likely to breastfeed and to breastfeed for longer (Moore et al review of 30 studies and 1925 babies a Cochrane Review concluded that skin to skin contact after birth enabled babies to interact more with their mothers, stay warmer, cry less are more likely to breastfeed and to breastfeed for longer (Moore et al Review concluded that skin to skin contact after birth enabled babies to interact more with their mothers, stay warmer, cry less are more likely to breastfeed and to breastfeed for longer (Moore et al 2007).

According to a 2009 study by the Cochrane Review, water birth statistically demonstrated no greater increase of infection than a traditional birth.

Olsen & Clausen: The first study listed, by Olsen and Clausen, was from 2012 and was published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias for each study using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011).

Two review authors (H Whitford, T Dowswell, H West, or S Wallis) independently assessed risk of bias for each study using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011).

That's why the folks at the Cochrane Review owe the scientific community an abject apology for publishing a «study» on homebirth that amounts to a piece of garbage.

The Cochrane review could not make any conclusions on the first few hours or days of a neonate's life and the possible side effects of epidural analgesia as none of the research studies being reviewed included any longer term data on neonates.

We also compared the Index to the Cochrane tool for assessing Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS - I)[38], which is widely used to assess research quality in systematic reviews [59].

Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias for each study using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (the Handbook)(Higgins 2011).

Jefferson, a physician based in Rome and prominent member of the Cochrane Collaboration, was charged with reviewing studies of the antiflu drug oseltamivir, sold as Tamiflu, during the height of the avian flu scare in 2005.

«There are no new data presented here on complications or hospitalizations that we did not already know of,» says epidemiologist Peter Doshi of the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy in Baltimore, a critic of Roche and part of the Cochrane group that reviewed Tamiflu studies.

«I think the Cochrane review highlighted the possibilities and benefits of using clonidine for pre-op sedation, [anxiety] and post-op pain, but we still need more well - designed, controlled studies before clonidine can be recommended as the pre-op drug of choice,» Zeltzer said.

After standardizing the Nordic Cochrane, USPSTF, and EUROSCREEN reviews to the scenario in the U.K. Independent Breast Screening Review, the magnitude of the difference between studies in the estimated number of women needed to be screened to prevent one breast cancer death dropped dramatically.

• Mild to moderate pneumonia: Three days is as effective as eight (el Moussaoui et al., 2006, British Medical Journal); four studies suggest three days is as effective as five in children (Haider et al., 2008, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews).

The Million Women Study in 2001 suggested that HRT use increased the risk of breast cancer significantly and the Cochrane Collaboration systematic review identified an increased risk of similar conditions.

In a review article published in 2010, physician Max H. Pittler of the German Cochrane Center at the University of Freiburg and physician Edzard Ernst of the Peninsula Medical School in Exeter, England, analyzed 12 well - designed studies comparing kava with a placebo for the treatment of anxiety.

The study is the first Cochrane systematic review to focus on zinc as a means to prevent childhood death, including deaths caused by diarrhea, one of the biggest killers of under - fives.

«The empirical evidence from that Nature study and numerous other local studies, including the Cochrane review of bed net trials against malaria, therefore demonstrate a consistent positive effect of bed nets across a wide range of different mosquito ecologies even when protection is partial.

A study published in the BMJ and a review published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews have reported that e-cig use was associated with successful attempts at quitting smoking.

According to Dr. Joel Kahn, a cardiologist and professor in our Advanced Functional Nutrition Training, «a group called the Cochrane Database Review looked at studies of CoQ10 for hypertension and found an average 11 mmHg BP drop, which is similar to many prescription medications.»

A group called the Cochrane Database Review looked at studies of CoQ10 for hypertension and found an average 11 mmHg BP drop, similar to many prescription medications.

Some researchers argue that the dosage used in many of the studies reviewed by the Cochrane Collaboration was too low (500 milligrams), and that because you lose a lot of C when you urinate, you need repeated dosing to knock out a cold.

• A 2003 Cochrane review of 57 short - term studies concluded that «there is little evidence for long - term benefit from reducing salt intake.

Under the «experiment» criteria, the CDC cited a Cochrane Review of experimental salt reduction studies as evidence that reducing salt intake lowers cardiovascular risk.9 The review consisted of eight small studies published between 1978 and 2007, of which five studies involving 5,912 participants included cardiovascular data during followReview of experimental salt reduction studies as evidence that reducing salt intake lowers cardiovascular risk.9 The review consisted of eight small studies published between 1978 and 2007, of which five studies involving 5,912 participants included cardiovascular data during followreview consisted of eight small studies published between 1978 and 2007, of which five studies involving 5,912 participants included cardiovascular data during follow - up.

A Cochrane review concluded that the evidence supporting the use of antioxidant vitamins and zinc for AMD comes primarily from the AREDS study [71].

The effectiveness of ketogenic diets is strongly supported in a recent Cochrane review where all studies showed a 30 — 40 % reduction in seizures compared with comparative controls, and the review authors reported that in children the effects were «comparable to modern antiepileptic drugs».

Published in Atherosclerosis Journal and using the Cochrane's review methodology, the authors of the analysis settled on using 52 studies using a variety of search terms, primarily focusing on cardiovascular and endothelial effects.

Since 1993 the Cochrane Collaboration has produced about 1,000 systematic reviews of studies on the effects of diverse health - care interventions.

A Cochrane Review25 of the effects of psychological treatments for people with dementia found that these treatments may contribute to a reduction in depressive symptoms, however evidence comes mostly from small - scale studies, with heterogeneous treatments.25 A recent systematic review of behavioural activation (BA) interventions for older people found that these are associated with a reduction in depressive symptoms in older people without dementia living in the community.26 The review also highlighted that most studies so far including people with dementia do not use well - defined interventions.

Data sources: CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, ISI, MEDLINE, PsycINFO were searched up to April 2011, supplemented by reference list searches of the included studies and relevant systematic reviews, hand searching 45 selected journals, tracking citations of included studies in Google Scholar and searching trial registers.

The search strategy will include terms for participants, setting, intervention, study design54 and outcome (sourced from current Cochrane systematic reviews examining the effectiveness of tobacco, alcohol and illicit substance use interventions; see web only appendix 1 for MEDLINE search strategy).4 — 6 The search strategy will be tailored as required for implementation in other information sources.

Such a review has the potential to identify studies not included in existing Cochrane reviews which, at the time of publication, were conducted up to 10 years ago.

However, when stratified by quality of studies, the Cochrane review found no statistically significant evidence in methodologically robust RCTs that exercise was more effective than psychological or pharmacological therapies.46 Nevertheless, we still found that depressive symptoms are associated with lower PA levels in individuals at high risk of CVD, which highlights the importance of screening and optimising conventional depression management48 to reduce depressive symptoms, which could help lower CVD risk.3 4

At least two review authors will independently assess risk of bias within each included study according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011a).

Two review authors (LOH and NL) will independently assess the risk of bias within each included study using the Cochrane «Risk of bias» assessment tool (Higgins 2011a).

Review authors will independently assess the risk of bias within the published reports of each included study based on the domains typically included within Cochrane reviews (sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of treatment providers and personnel, blinding of outcome assessors, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting bias, and other sources of bias), and assign ratings of high, low or unclear risk of bias in accordance with plans presented in Appendix 3.