Sentences with phrase «commission decision finding»

Not exact matches

This charge was prominent in the Atomic Energy Commission's statements and decision, but was given little weight by the Personnel Security Board (the Gray Board), which after extensive hearings found «no indication of disloyalty... and eloquent and convincing testimony to his deep devotion to his country» and «a high degree of discretion reflecting an unusual ability to keep to himself vital secrets.

Decision: Based on the overwhelming evidence before the Commission, the Commission is satisfied and finds as a fact that the vehicle was received and added to the Presidential Pool on 2nd November, 2012.

Decision: Under the circumstance, the Commission finds the allegation that the Ministry of Roads and Highways was in the process of awarding the contract for the construction of the 28 kilometre Wa - Hamile road worth GHC82, 000,000.00 to Djibril Kanazoe through sole sourcing speculative and not supported by the evidence.

Decision: The Commission is satisfied with the actions of the Respondent after the gift was made, and accordingly finds that his conduct was not consistent with that of a person who had been corrupted by a gift or improperly influenced by same.

His decision to remain an «active» judge prompted the state Commission on Judicial Conduct to find last month that McCullough failed «to respect and comply with the law.»

The Siena poll finds Cuomo's decision to end the Moreland Commission, in the midst of a corruption probe, doesn't sit well with voters.

The finding, which comes from a YouGov survey commissioned by campaign site Avaaz, increases the pressure on the government on the final day of consultation on the decision.

Kicking the decision over to a commission looks to have a healthy track record of delivering: a 2014 study by the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) found that every state legislature that saw a pay raise during the preceding 12 months had done so without a vote; the states that saw the largest hikes, Hawaii and California, each did it by passing the task to a commission.

Find below a section of the EC statement EC CLARIFIES ELECTRONIC RESULTS TRANSMISSION AND CONTRACTUAL PROCESS As obvious from the above extract from the Committee's recommendations, the Electoral Commission only accepted to implement a proposal and decision which was taken by the Committee and collectively accepted by all the political parties at the Inter-Party Advisory Committee (IPAC) level.

The commission investigated Monserrate's fund, to which a number of lawmakers also contributed, based on a joint complaint filed by Common Cause / NY, the NY League of Women Voters and NYPIRG, which also publicized the findings (had it not been for a press release from Blair Horner this morning, I would have had no idea this decision had even been reached).

ALBANY — A federal water study commissioned by the Cuomo administration as it weighed a key decision on fracking was edited and delayed by state officials before it was published, a Capital review has found.

Aminu Sule Lamido, the 34 year old son of former Jigawa State governor, Alhaji Sule Lamido, had his appeal struck out on Monday by an appellate court sitting in Kaduna against the decision of the Federal High Court, Kano which found him guilty of the charge of money laundering brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC.

However, legal experts point to an earlier appellate court decision in 2003 on the Suffolk Ethics Commission that found a county can impose more stringent ethics regulations than those required by state law.

The Minority Caucus in Parliament has become aware of findings contained in the decision of the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) on a complaint filed against the Finance Minister over the infamous US$ 2.25 billion bond in March this year.

Improved diagnostic tests are on the horizon, but we need huge efforts to increase their accuracy, use them for active case finding in the community, and eventually make them available in low income countries so as to inform treatment decisions and preserve the efficacy of any new antibiotic drugs for TB,» says lead author of the Commission Professor Keertan Dheda, University of Cape Town.

So it was an easy decision for the clients to participate and benefit: Trident would only charge its customary commission based on revenues received by the authors, and Trident would not become an e-book publisher, profiting at the client's expense, being a rights holder, and finding itself potentially in an adversarial position with authors.

FERC agreed with the group, finding approval «premature» and noting that it would «impact options the commission could undertake in response to the EPSA decision.»

The decision to go for a 40 % emissions reduction target ignores key findings from the European Commission's own research which show higher targets will bring savings on health costs, reduce dependency on energy imports and not significantly affect GDP.

In Southeast Asia, the palm oil industry was stung by the decision by Unilever, the world's largest buyer of palm oil, to suspend its contract with Sinar Mas, the world's second largest producer of palm oil, after an investigation commissioned by the consumer products giant found allegations made by Greenpeace about the palm oil producer's environmental record to be true.

A YouGov study, commissioned by leading job board, totaljobs, surveyed 606 senior business decision makers across Great Britain to find out their opinions on mental health in the workplace.

In the decision Commission v Germany, the Court dismissed an action brought under Art 260 (2) TFEU for failure to comply with the 2007 VW law judgment; and in Essent it found Dutch measures ensuring public ownership of gas and electricity transmission system operators justifiable on public interest grounds.

Having regard to the high cost of pharmaceuticals ($ 34.5 billion in 2013), and the recent decisions of the US Supreme Court and European Commission finding that reverse payments are «valid targets for antitrust... [more]

The CJEU considered that while the national court is bound by the Commission's decision as to the existence of an anticompetitive practice, finding such anticompetitive practice is only one element of a private action for damages.

If you go to a hearing and the Commission rules against you, you will have the opportunity to file an appeal to the decision; however, it will be very difficult, if not impossible, to find an attorney to take over your claim at this point.

Since the summary of those findings was announced, no details on the reasons and on the parties» petitions for review — other than the fact that both parties did ask the Commission, the six - member decision - making body at the top of the ITC, to overrule the judge in their favor on some items — entered the public record until today.

The Court also held that findings can not be based upon speculation and that the Commission had improperly interpreted the «recommending or encouraging» provisions of the Alberta Securities Act (the «Act») in a decision that is certain to give pause to Securities Commissions across Canada....

According to The Associated Press, a spokesperson for the commission said the agency reversed itself to «follow... a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that found states can not engage in «content - based discrimination.»»

But in an Oct. 25 decision, Court of Queen's Bench Justice William Grant found that Potter was not constructively dismissed but had effectively resigned from his position when he launched his legal action against the commission in March 2010.

The nub of the Commission's reasoning is to be found in paragraphs 54 to 70 of its decision.

In the 2009 decision on the takeover of Dutch utility Essent by German utility RWE, the Commission distinguished between peak and off peak hours, with markets being national at peak hours whereas there is a north west European market at off peak times (para. 30 et seq.) We find none of this deeper insight in this preliminary assessment.

The Commission summarised its findings in the Pelikan / Kyocera - decision in its XXVth Report on Competition Policy (1995)(cf. p. 41) as follows.

In order to support this finding, the GC based itself on recital 140 of the Decision, where the Commission found that, because of the tax transparent status of the EIGs, which enables different operators to join and finance any investment or carry out any economic activity, the tax status of the EIGs under Spanish law did not confer any selective advantage to the EIGs or to their members.

EFIM sought for an annulment of the EFIM - decision, but the General Court confirmed the findings of the Commission in its judgment of 24 November 2011 in Case T ‑ 296 / 09), including — interestingly enough — the substantive analysis of dominance based on the four criteria mentioned.

The Court found that the (unique) solution imagined by the Commission to compensate for the lack of safeguards established by US law does not conform to such requirements as the «Principles» only bind US companies that have self - certify and not US public authorities (Article 1 of the Safe Harbour Decision).

Aside from the lower court decisions in B.C. Motor Vehicles Reference, it appears the only decisions to find that «principles of fundamental justice» include a substantive element are Regina v. Young (1984) 46 O.R. (2d) 520 (C.A.) and Mia v. British Columbia (Medical Services Commission), [1985] B.C.J. No. 2920 (S.C.).

This does not mean that the seal hunters will not prevail in the end (although I doubt it), as they have also challenged the Commission implementing Regulation, which will enable them to challenge the basic Regulation too (the decision of the GC in that case can be found here and my comments are here).

(The record of the Commission's findings between January 2004 and July 2014 indicates that in non-cartel infringement decisions the majority (10/12) were based on a «by object» decision which saved the need for the Commission to spend time and resources in examining detailed evidence on the effect of the agreements under scrutiny).

Given the gaps found, the working party urged the commission to resolve these concerns in order to improve the draft adequacy decision and ensure that the Privacy Shield offers equivalent protections to that of the EU.

On 26 July 2000 the Commission issued such a decision finding that the Safe Harbour provided adequate protection.

On that note, here are Legal Sourcery's most popular CanLII tips: CanLII's Boolean Operators; CanLII Commentary; CanLII Connects: Start Taking Your Research to the Next Level; CanLII Tutorial Videos; Office of the Residential Tenancies Decisions on CanLII; Saskatchewan Labour Arbitration Awards; Saskatchewan Real Estate Commission on CanLII; What Do You Do When You Find What You've Been Looking For?

These include: United States v. Resendiz - Ponce, which presents the question whether the omission of an element from a federal indictment can constitute harmless error (9th Circuit says no); Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., on whether a provider of pay phone services can sue a long distance carrier for alleged violations of the Federal Communications Commission's regulations concerning compensation for coinless pay phone calls (9th Circuit says yes); Cunningham v. California, a sentencing case involving whether whether California's Determinate Sentencing Law violates the 6th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by permitting California state court judges at sentencing to impose enhanced sentenced based on their determination of facts neither found by the jury nor admitted by the defendant; and Carey v. Musladin, reviewing the 9th Circuit's decision to overturn a murder conviction of a defendant who claimed he was denied a fair trial because the victim's relatives appeared in court wearing buttons with the deceased's picture on them.

A more complete discussion of these issues can be found in the Commission's decision Randall v. SHS International, Inc., VWC File No. 214-26-37 (March 29, 2004).

The court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal and High Court that the owner of the track, had no liability for the nuisance since they did not «participate directly» in the commission of it, but found the occupiers were liable.

BAA Ltd v Competition Commission & Ryanair Ltd The Court of Appeal has restored the Competition Commission («the Commission») decision ordering BAA to divest itself of Gatwick airport, Stansted airport, and either Glasgow or Edinburgh airport, finding that there was no apparent bias in its decision.

b) The Commission found a «final decision» was made in respect of the grievances at the third level, but did not provide any analysis or reasons for this finding, nor comment on the merits of the grievances;

Since Spraytech, it has cropped up in a whole range of municipal reports, environmental review commission findings and terms of reference and in more and more legislation and court decisions.

Now, in this case the Court of Appeal had clear guidance with respect to the fifth factor in the form of a recent Supreme Court of Canada decision — ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 SCC 45 — in which the Court found the standard to be applied to decisions of the Commission (when applying its expertise to set rates and approve payment amounts) is reasonableness.

In summary, their lordships upheld the approach adopted by Ofcom (in line with the Commission's Reg TP decision) when assessing H3G's position on the market, ie, ignore all SMP related regulation, whilst taking account of regulation that would continue to exist independently of an SMP finding throughout the relevant (forward - looking) period.

Akzo Nobel Chemicals is seeking a review and annulment of the findings of the Court of First Instance (CFI) in September 2007, upholding a decision of the Commission to read documents it obtained while investigating possible anti-competitive practices.

This restates the finding of the European Commission's admissibility decision in Dujardin and Others v Franc.