Sentences with phrase «committee on access to justice»

Recently, the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, a group broadly representative of leaders across Canada in the field of civil and family justice, and chaired by Supreme Court of Canada Justice Thomas Cromwell, emphasized the value of front - end services, such as those family justice services funded by this government, especially those that include «live» help.
The Canadian Forum on Civil Justice is pleased to play a support role in the execution of research and dissemination activities for the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters.
The national Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters gratefully acknowledges the following for providing in - kind or financial support:
The National Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters this week made two reports available to the public.
For example, the cost of civil matters can vary but according to an October 2013 report published by the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, national ranges of legal fees may vary from «$ 13,561 — $ 37,229 for a civil action up to trial (2 days), $ 23,083 — $ 79,750 for a civil action up to trial (5 days), $ 38,296 — $ 124,574 for a civil action up to trial (7 days)»
The most recent report of the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters — A Roadmap for Change, October 2013 — called for more access to justice research in order to promote evidence - based policymaking.
National Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, Final Report: «Access to Civil & Family Justice — A Roadmap for Change» October 2013
Your suggested «council» already exists: The Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters of which CJ McLachlin in the honorary chair.
The one - case - one - judge court model was considered and strongly recommended in the final report of the Family Justice Working Group, one of four working groups of the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters.
The committee will act on recommendations outlined in Access to Civil & Family Justice: A Roadmap for Change, released in October by the National Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters.
This trend is having a wide - ranging impact on the justice system, as documented by the National Self - Represented Litigants Project and the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters.
The Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters launched the #justiceforall campaign designed to raise public understanding of accessible justice challenges as a component of a healthy democracy.
In March the Action Committee on Access to Justice and Family Matters convened a meeting of provincial and territorial access to justice groups.
As work to improve access to justice in civil and family matters continues to gain momentum across Canada, the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters is pleased to announce the launch of a major project to develop and publish a Status Report on the State of Access to Justice in Canada.
Justice Cromwell also discussed the challenges of access to justice and touched on the work of the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, which he chairs.
On March 13, 2015 the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters (the Action Committee) convened a meeting for existing provincial and territorial access to justice groups (P / T A2J groups), many of which were formed in response to recommendation 5.1 of the Action Committee's Roadmap Report.
This Working Group works under the sponsorship of the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters in the context of the Roadmap for Change recommendations 8.1 and 8.2:
[11] Report of the National Action Committee on Access to Justice is Civil and Family Matters, Access to Civil & Family Justice: A Roadmap for Change (2003), at page 1 — «The civil and family justice system is too complex, too slow and too expensive.
The Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters has reported that the cost of a civil action up to a 5 - day trial ranges from $ 23,083 to $ 79,750 (Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, «Access to Civil & Family Justice: A Roadmap for Change» (Ottawa, October 2013) at 4, n 29 [Action Committee]-RRB-.
Jeff is also the representative of the Federation on Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin's Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, where he is a member of the Steering Committee.
[6] Report of the National Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, Access to Civil & Family Justice: A Roadmap for Change (2003), at page 15 — «Access to justice must become more than a vague and aspirational principle.
The Society is engaged in similar dialogue at the national level, through the Federation of Law Societies of Canada, which is working to improve access to legal services, and with groups such as the Canadian Forum on Civil Justice and the National Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters.
I think we've reached consensus on this point, as the truckload of recent reports from the national Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, the Canadian Bar Association and a handful of law societies seems to suggest.
The Canadian Bar Association and the national Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters have been trying, over the last couple of years, to stimulate interest nationally in empirical justice research.
First, the 2012 report of the Family Justice Working Group (PDF) of the national Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, recommended that each jurisdiction establish its own unified family court with:
Jeff currently chairs the Federation's Standing Committee on Access to Legal Services and represents Council on Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin's Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters.
In Ontario, TAG — The Action Group on Access to Justice was recently established, following recommendations like those from the Canadian Bar Association and the National Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters (NAC).
The final report of the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters,
The national Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters notes in its final report that only about 6.5 % of legal problems ever make it to court, but it is unlikely in the extreme that so many of the people with high school diplomas or less are bundled into the 93.5 % who manage to resolve their legal issues outside of court, especially when we know that for people with low incomes, legal issues tend not come one at a time but cluster and multiply into other areas of the law.
The final report of the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, A Roadmap for Change, tackles the difficult problem of why this is the case and lays out recommendations for what can be done to bring full access to justice to Canadians.
Two weeks ago, the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters released the Colloquium Report.
Pretty much every report on self - represented litigants, from the work of the Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family to the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters to the CBA's Envisioning Equal Justice Initiative to the National Self - represented Litigants Project, agrees that the cost of legal representation is the number one barrier to accessible justice.
A number were proposed in the Final Report of the Family Justice Working Group of the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters.
But law societies are expanding the field of professionals they authorize to give legal advice: see the Report of the Access to Legal Services Working Group, May, 2012, of the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters.
(vi) while every group experiences civil needs, the poorest and most vulnerable experience more frequent and more complex, interrelated civil legal problems: Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Matters, Family Justice Reform - A Review of Reports and Initiatives: Canadian Forum on Civil Justice, online http://www.cfcj-fcjc.org/sites/default/files/docs/2013/Family%20Justice%20Reform%20Review%20-%20April%2015%20Final.pdf.
Last week, the National Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, chaired by Justice Tom Cromwell, released for public consultation two of four reports from its working groups.
The final report of the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, A Roadmap for Change, tackles the difficult problem of why this is the case and lays out... [more]
In 2008, responding to these concerns, the Chief Justice initiated, and is the Honourary Chair of, the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, made up of leaders from all of the key sectors of the justice community and public representatives.
Law reform commissions as well as self - standing initiatives such as the National Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters have made this sort of rethinking a priority for moving forward.
Earlier this year, Ms. Walwyn was appointed to the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, which was convened by the Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, Chief Justice of Canada, and is focused on improving access to the civil and family justice system.
The final report of the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters recommends an Early Resolution Services Sector (ERSS) that embodies this idea.
[5] In A Roadmap for Change, then - Justice Cromwell's Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters devoted two of its nine goals to issues of research and funding.
All four reports from the National Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters are available on the Canadian Forum on Civil Justice's web site.
A greater focus on technology and strong leadership from the judiciary are both key to improving access to civil justice, according to a series of reports released yesterday by the National Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters.
(4) Reports, dated May 2012, of the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, recommending that legal services be provided by non-lawyer professionals who provide related services: Report of the Access to Legal Services Working Group; and, Report of the Court Processes Simplification Working Group.
In particular, we have the benefit of the CBA's Envisioning Equal Justice Summit and report and the final report of the National Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family matters.
Thankfully, the issue of access to justice is figuring prominently in the general debate, as evidenced by the recently released CBA Legal Futures report and the ongoing work of the Action Committee on Access to Justice.
A recent report by the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, chaired by Supreme Court of Canada Justice Thomas A. Cromwell, stated nearly 12 million Canadians will experience at least one legal problem in a three - year period, and few will have the resources to solve them.

Not exact matches

We sincerely hope that the secretary of state and his colleagues will read this report and will act on the committee's recommendation so that the government's reforms do not deny the most vulnerable people in society access to justice.
ActionAid USA African Services Committee AIDS Foundation of Chicago AIDS Taskforce of Greater Cleveland Alliance for a Just Society BAART Programs California NOW Center for Biological Diversity Center for Economic and Social Rights Center of Concern Chicago Political Economy Group Conference of Major Superiors of Men Corporate Accountability International DYNS Services EcoEquity EG Justice Food & Water Watch Foundation Earth Franciscan Action Network Friends of the Earth U.S. Gender Action Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives Grassroots Global Justice Alliance Grassroots International Greenpeace USA Health Global Access Project (GAP) HIV Prevention Justice Alliance (HIV PJA) HIV / AIDS Law Project Holy Cross International Justice Office Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy International HIV / AIDS Alliance USA International Rivers Jobs with Justice Jubilee Oregon Jubilee USA Network Labor Campaign for Single Payer Labor Network for Sustainability Lifelong AIDS Alliance Main Street Alliance Marin Interfaith Task Force on the Americas, USA Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns National Nurses United National Organization for Women (NOW) NETWORK New Rules for Global Finance Nicaragua Center for Community Action Oxfam America PeterCares House PR CoNCRA Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) Raging Grannies Rainforest Action Network RESULTS Right to the City Alliance Sustainable Energy and Economy Network / Institute for Policy Studies Sisters of the Holy Cross — Congregation Justice Committee START at Westminster SustainUS Tax Justice Network USA Voices Of Community Activists & Leaders (VOCAL - NY) Wealth for the Common Good Women Together for Change, Inc. 350.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z