Sentences with phrase «committee on judicial independence»

40 No. 7 ByBrenda TsoBrenda Tso, a 3L at Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, is the 2011 - 2012 liaison to the Standing Committee on Judicial Independence.

Data is relatively limited and fairly dated as to the diversity composition of various state benches; most authorities cite a report by the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Judicial Independence (first published in 2004 and updated last in 2010) or a 2009 compilation of data by the American Judicature Society.

The ABA Standing Committee on Judicial Independence has undertaken and made significant accomplishments on many projects regarding judicial independence.

The ABA Standing Committee on Judicial Independence has undertaken and made significant accomplishments on many projects regarding

39 No. 4By Nicholas D. WittenbergNicholas D. Wittenberg, a third - year student at The University of Toledo College of Law, is the 2010 — 11 Law Student Division liaisons to the Standing Committee on Judicial Independence.

He currently serves on the ABA Standing Committee on Government Affairs and is a past chair of the ABA Standing Committee on Judicial Independence.

Not exact matches

A meeting of the Supreme Court's party committee on Wednesday said China would draw boundaries with the West's notion of «judicial independence» and «separation of powers», the state - run China News Service said.

The caliber of jurists on the Committee is also motivating for law students seeking to gain a better understanding of why judicial independence is a significant issue.

Home Daily News Defending Justice: Essays on judicial independence Defending Justice By Judge Herbert B. Dixon Jr. and Molly McDonough Posted January 25, 2018, 8:31 am CST On behalf of the ABA Standing Committee on the American Judicial System and the ABA Journal, we are pleased to initiate a collection of essays on the broad... Continue reading «Defending Justice: Essays on judicial independence&raquon judicial independence Defending Justice By Judge Herbert B. Dixon Jr. and Molly McDonough Posted January 25, 2018, 8:31 am CST On behalf of the ABA Standing Committee on the American Judicial System and the ABA Journal, we are pleased to initiate a collection of essays on the broad... Continue reading «Defending Justice: Essays on judicial independencjudicial independence Defending Justice By Judge Herbert B. Dixon Jr. and Molly McDonough Posted January 25, 2018, 8:31 am CST On behalf of the ABA Standing Committee on the American Judicial System and the ABA Journal, we are pleased to initiate a collection of essays on the broad... Continue reading «Defending Justice: Essays on judicial independence&raquOn behalf of the ABA Standing Committee on the American Judicial System and the ABA Journal, we are pleased to initiate a collection of essays on the broad... Continue reading «Defending Justice: Essays on judicial independence&raquon the American Judicial System and the ABA Journal, we are pleased to initiate a collection of essays on the broad... Continue reading «Defending Justice: Essays on judicial independencJudicial System and the ABA Journal, we are pleased to initiate a collection of essays on the broad... Continue reading «Defending Justice: Essays on judicial independence&raquon the broad... Continue reading «Defending Justice: Essays on judicial independence&raquon judicial independencjudicial independence»

The Judicial Independence Committee studied and reported on the problems experienced by our judges and formulated responses.

The Inquiry Committee suggests that it is fundamentally inappropriate and an improper intrusion on judicial independence for its process to be subjected to interlocutory judicial review before the Federal Court:

On their face, however, they do raise three issues that seem prima facie of concern: 1) the legitimacy of having rulings by the Federal Court about its process without any submissions made on the Committee's behalf; 2) the legitimacy of the Federal Court reviewing the Committee's conduct on an interlocutory basis; and 3) the legitimacy of the Federal Court intervening in a process designed to respect judicial independence, and to provide a mechanism for implementing s. 99 of the ConstitutioOn their face, however, they do raise three issues that seem prima facie of concern: 1) the legitimacy of having rulings by the Federal Court about its process without any submissions made on the Committee's behalf; 2) the legitimacy of the Federal Court reviewing the Committee's conduct on an interlocutory basis; and 3) the legitimacy of the Federal Court intervening in a process designed to respect judicial independence, and to provide a mechanism for implementing s. 99 of the Constitutioon the Committee's behalf; 2) the legitimacy of the Federal Court reviewing the Committee's conduct on an interlocutory basis; and 3) the legitimacy of the Federal Court intervening in a process designed to respect judicial independence, and to provide a mechanism for implementing s. 99 of the Constitutioon an interlocutory basis; and 3) the legitimacy of the Federal Court intervening in a process designed to respect judicial independence, and to provide a mechanism for implementing s. 99 of the Constitution.

Justice Pariente co-chairs the National Association of Women Judges» Judicial Independence Committee which works on issues relating to the independence of the judiciary, particularly as they affect women and minoIndependence Committee which works on issues relating to the independence of the judiciary, particularly as they affect women and minoindependence of the judiciary, particularly as they affect women and minority judges.