Sentences with phrase «common law tort liability»

Not exact matches

«A defendant's conduct can not be deemed «unreasonable» when that conduct has been expressly sanctioned by statute, for it is well established that, even where «it would be a nuisance at common law, conduct that is fully authorized by statue, ordinance or administrative regulation does not subject the actor to tort liability.

[Where state trooper took affirmative action of allowing police dog to be off leash, there is no immunity from suit; actions for personal injury caused by police dog will be analyzed under the dog bite common law, whether the owner of the dog knew or should have known of the dog's vicious propensities, as the Massachusetts Tort Claims Act does not permit actions under strict liability.]

Other significant experience includes matters involving common law fraud, contract, commercial torts, product liability, bankruptcy, creditors» rights, mechanic's liens, lender liability, unfair competition, covenants not to compete, shareholder disputes, intellectual property, insurance and reinsurance.

His practice focuses largely on the litigation of complex disputes involving common law, statutory law, contract law, physician and hospital liability law, products liability law, commercial, corporate and business issues, catastrophic personal injury cases and class action / mass torts / pharmaceutical litigation.

Mr. Sistrunk's practice focuses largely on the litigation of complex disputes involving common law, statutory law, contract law, physician and hospital liability law, product liability law, commercial, corporate and business issues, catastrophic personal injury cases and class action / mass torts / pharmaceutical litigation.

But tort liability, and especially the possible ways common law could be shaped via the courts to address bad results from AI, is different from regulatory scope.

The Drug and Medical Device Product Liability Deskbook includes: detailed coverage of: warning - related claims and defenses; other information - based theories; strict liability; FDA - related per se liability; preemption of common law tort claims by the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act and FDA regulations; class actions in drug and medical device litigation; theories of liability asserted against entities other than manufacturers; practical issues involving litigation management; the use of expert witnesses; and many other importanLiability Deskbook includes: detailed coverage of: warning - related claims and defenses; other information - based theories; strict liability; FDA - related per se liability; preemption of common law tort claims by the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act and FDA regulations; class actions in drug and medical device litigation; theories of liability asserted against entities other than manufacturers; practical issues involving litigation management; the use of expert witnesses; and many other importanliability; FDA - related per se liability; preemption of common law tort claims by the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act and FDA regulations; class actions in drug and medical device litigation; theories of liability asserted against entities other than manufacturers; practical issues involving litigation management; the use of expert witnesses; and many other importanliability; preemption of common law tort claims by the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act and FDA regulations; class actions in drug and medical device litigation; theories of liability asserted against entities other than manufacturers; practical issues involving litigation management; the use of expert witnesses; and many other importanliability asserted against entities other than manufacturers; practical issues involving litigation management; the use of expert witnesses; and many other important topics.

While at common law the employer is liable for the torts of an employee committed in the ordinary course of employment, the Appellant's alleged liability in this case arose from the provisions of the Traffic Safety Act.