Competitive policy innovation between major cities should start to see them create bold new ideas to deal with seemingly intractable social and economic problems.
Not exact matches
Canada's strengths — and there are many — seem to be overshadowed by relatively low performance in many
policy areas that likely influence
innovation, ranging from access to markets and
competitive environment, to regulation, taxes, intellectual property rights, and governments» own often diffuse support for research and development.
My own personal view is that these
policies are highly unlikely to cause a material change in CPI because of a highly
competitive global microeconomic structure, lots of spare capacity, an likely endogenous supply side improvement, and an acceleration in
innovation which is being missed by depressed confidence.
He has been active in a wide range of community and public
policy organizations and has earned a reputation for speaking out on
innovation and
competitive issues affecting Canada.
These factors — many of which are beyond our control and the effects of which can be difficult to predict — include: credit, market, liquidity and funding, insurance, operational, regulatory compliance, strategic, reputation, legal and regulatory environment,
competitive and systemic risks and other risks discussed in the risk sections of our 2017 Annual Report; including global uncertainty and volatility, elevated Canadian housing prices and household indebtedness, information technology and cyber risk, regulatory change, technological
innovation and new entrants, global environmental
policy and climate change, changes in consumer behavior, the end of quantitative easing, the business and economic conditions in the geographic regions in which we operate, the effects of changes in government fiscal, monetary and other
policies, tax risk and transparency and environmental and social risk.
Technological
innovations have dropped the price of wind and solar in some markets to be not only
competitive with traditional fossil fuel power generation, but sometimes less expensive, said Malcolm Woolf, senior vice president of
policy and government affairs for Advanced Energy Economy.
The California Energy Commission's Integrated Energy
Policy Report (IEPR) and Federal Stimulus Program (Ad Hoc) Committees will conduct a joint workshop to discuss clean technology
innovation efforts funded through U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
competitive solicitations with a focus on projects receiving cost - share funding from the Energy Commission's Public Interest Energy Research and Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Programs.
CanWEA 2017 will examine this Energy Transition, and the market rules, infrastructure investments, technological
innovation, operational improvements, and
policy solutions that will open the door to long - term, sustainable opportunities for our industry and, at the same time, ensure Canada remains
competitive in the rapidly advancing low - carbon economy.
So when I say «energy
innovation»
policies, I'm not talking about a silver bullet, I'm talking about a suite of
policies from R&D, demonstration, financing, deployment, and market - based that not only develop the clean tech we need, but creates a
competitive market for them, and get those technologies to market quicker than if left alone.My concerns shared in the post are those that ignore the
innovation piece and assume, to a point a you do, that price or regs or taxes will have not just an immediate impact but a LARGE impact.
And it means adopting a new era of
innovation policies to ensure the U.S. economy is the most
competitive in the world, directing targeted public investments into strategic technologies, infrastructure, and high - tech education programs.
But the pathway to developing cheap, scalable zero carbon energy technologies will be much the same as the path we have taken to developing cleaner fossil energy technology — sustained public support for technology
innovation and targeted
policies to deploy those technologies as they begin to become
competitive.
Bruce Burcat, Executive Director of the Mid-Atlantic Renewable Energy Coalition, told me, «Sound
policies like the PTC have driven
innovation which has helped reduce the cost of wind energy down by about 66 percent over the past six years, making it highly price
competitive with traditional forms of energy resources.
Companies that set ambitious greenhouse gas reduction efforts today will gain a
competitive advantage in the years to come, for a few reasons: Gains in efficiency lead to cost savings; credible targets bolster a company's reputation; ambitious goals spur
innovation and transformational change, which can unlock opportunities for growth; and science - based targets will help companies stay ahead of shifting public
policies.
Ask a
policy maker or a scientist or a CEO what kind of
innovation will be key to stay
competitive, and the answer is that green equals green.