Results:
Confirmatory factor analysis supports, with acceptable modifications, the 14 modes but fails to support their theorized grouping into the Child, Parent and Coping categories.
Confirmatory factor analyses supported a two - factor structure including callous and uncaring dimensions from 12 of the 24 original ICU items.
RESULTS:
Confirmatory factor analysis supported a 5 - factor measurement model.
Confirmatory factor analyses supported the two - and three - factor model, but the two - factor model (Callous - Unemotional and Impulsivity / Conduct Problems) was more parsimonious.
Confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesised one - factor solution, suggesting that WEMWBS measures a single underlying concept.
Not exact matches
Confirmatory factor analysis found
support for two - and three -
factor models of the PDS - R.
RESULTS: Exploratory
factor analyses support a three -
factor structure explaining 53.44 % of the variance and
confirmatory factor analyses validate that the measuring tool reflects three distinct
factors, which are 1) compliance with safety rules and procedures, 2) participation and initiatives related to prevention, and 3) concern for social and physical environment.
[jounal] Brookings, J. B. / 1988 /
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Interpersonal
Support Evaluation List / American Journal of Community Psychology 16 (1): 137 ~ 147
Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the measurement model of macro ratings of limit setting and positive behavior
support was not
supported by the data, and thus, were excluded from further
analyses.
support - seeking; relationship closeness; social relationships; emerging adults;
confirmatory factor analysis
Model fit indices from a
confirmatory factor analysis showed mixed
support for a three -
factor model.