Sentences with phrase «conflicts of national laws»

Conflicts of National Laws with International Business Activity: Issues of Extraterritoriality, British - North American Committee 30, by A.H. Hermann.

Not exact matches

But while the European Commission says the reforms will make it easier for businesses, a conflict between the regulation and another EU directive on e-privacy could mean national telecommunications laws would override some elements of the regulation, meaning in some cases companies would still face complying with 27 different national laws.

That led TM to seek a ruling from the NEB confirming that the Board had the jurisdiction to authorize TM's activities, and, to the extent that Burnaby's by - laws were making it impossible for TM to carry out the necessary tests, a ruling that the by - laws were constitutionally inapplicable, or if not inapplicable, were in conflict with the provisions of the National Energy Board Act and therefore inoperative on the basis of the paramountcy doctrine.

Because the EU regulations are not fully harmonised in all aspects Member States may adopt rules at national level in areas that are not harmonised at EU level — provided that these national rules are proportionate, justified and do not conflict with rules of EU law (in particular the rules of the Treaty).

11.1 These By - laws shall not conflict with the By - laws of the National Athletic Trainers» Association (NATA).

«We should never be ashamed of saying we will promote our own national interest, for the British national interest is no narrow agenda,» Mr Hague said, saying it could be used to promote free trade and sound development, push for Middle East peace, prevent conflict in Africa and help ensure international law is upheld.

By comparing individuals» subjective interpretations and feelings (through interviews) with large scale data (in reports) and laws (outlined by human rights and Thai national laws), the research utilizes the triangulation approach to come up with a study that attempts to respect both the micro (individual) and macro (context) and therefore paint the human faces of displaced persons affected by factors beyond their control (conflict in Myanmar and Thai politics and law).

This article aims to demonstrate that current international relations governed by the law of the strongest necessarily have to be governed in the future for a world government that is able to preserve world peace, defend the general interests of the planet making them compatible with the interests of every nation, mediate international conflicts and build consensus among all national states.

In some contexts, national laws and policies, and even the preferences of refugee community members, may conflict with the global strategy.»

As part of a two - day national summit here on revitalizing native languages, three founders of immersion schools that are teaching children Cherokee, Ojibwe, and Native Hawaiian contended that some No Child Left Behind provisions present huge hurdles for language - immersion programs or schools and conflict with schooling rights spelled out in another federal law, the Native American Languages...

Bill would damage credit scores of million of consumers Consumer Action joined the National Consumer Law Center and other organizations in opposition to HR 435 — legislation that would reduce consumers» control over their own data by preempting state and federal privacy protections, damage the credit scores of millions of consumers with a disproportionate impact on African Americans, and conflict with long - standing state utility regulatory consumer protections.

He teaches part - time at Pepperdine University School of Law, the National Judicial College, as well as private training sessions for professionals worldwide on the subject of managing high - conflict personalities and high - conflict disputes.

In conclusion, one can state that the primacy of EU law, as interpreted by the ECJ inTaricco I ruling, does not conflict with national fundamental human rights; indeed, like Italy, even the other EU Member States, together with individual human rights, protect fundamental social rights.

He investigates the similarities and differences between the national judicial treatment in applying and interpreting EU and ECHR law and concludes that accession will not render these differences moot: in fact, the CJEU clarified in the Kamberaj case that EU law does not require the disapplication of domestic law conflicting with the Convention — the effects of the ECHR will therefore continue to depend on the national constitutions, not the law of the EU (pp. 156 - 158).

Primacy, that is the precedence EU law takes over any national laws in cases of conflict, is one of the most fundamental aspects of EU law.

Customary international law is seemingly irreconcilably conflicted on the fundamental issue of whether it recognizes an international law equivalent to national - domestic statutes of limitations.

The rules relating to conflicts of interest and bias under the national arbitration laws of England, France, Switzerland and the US is set out in the third section of the book, again illustrated with numerous key cases decided in those jurisdictions by the national courts.

(i) where there is a breach of a right afforded under EU law, article 47 of the Charter is engaged; (ii) the right to an effective remedy for breach of EU law rights provided for by article 47 embodies a general principle of EU law; (iii)(subject to exceptions which have no application in the present case) that general principle has horizontal effect; (iv) in so far as a provision of national law conflicts with the requirement for an effective remedy in article 47, the domestic courts can and must disapply the conflicting provision; and (v) the only exception to (iv) is that the court may be required to apply a conflicting domestic provision where the court would otherwise have to redesign the fabric of the legislative scheme.

Good progress was being made on rule of law development at the national level when Yemen was suddenly engulfed in an international and violent conflict in which Iran and Saudi Arabia were the main actors.

Ms. Trout has also presented nationally at the international conferences of the Association for Conflict Resolution (ACR) in Toronto in 2001; the Family Section Conferences of ACR in 2002 and 2003 (Georgia and Colorado; respectively); the national conference for ACR in Florida in 2003 (and served as conference co-chair); the Institute for the Study of Conflict Transformation at South Texas College of Law in 2004; and the National Conference of Minority Professionals in Alternative Dispute Resolution at Capital University Law School in Ohio in 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respenational conference for ACR in Florida in 2003 (and served as conference co-chair); the Institute for the Study of Conflict Transformation at South Texas College of Law in 2004; and the National Conference of Minority Professionals in Alternative Dispute Resolution at Capital University Law School in Ohio in 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respeNational Conference of Minority Professionals in Alternative Dispute Resolution at Capital University Law School in Ohio in 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

Thirdly, the doctrine of supremacy of EU law demands that in a case of conflict with national law, EU law should prevail.

In conclusion, one can state that the primacy of EU law, as interpreted by the ECJ, does not conflict with national fundamental rights.

78 The Member States must not only interpret their national law in a manner consistent with European Union law but also make sure they do not rely on an interpretation of an instrument of secondary legislation which would be in conflict with the fundamental rights protected by the legal order of the European Union (see Parliament v Council, paragraph 105, and Detiček, paragraph 34).

This coverage notes the DC Circuit's unanimous decision that the National Labor Relations Board failed to do its job of reconciling conflicting labor laws and must revisit a matter involving Children's Hospital and Research Center of Oakland.

1) we agree to disagree:) 2) supremacy of EU law for the EU system is the equivalent of the hard core of constitutional values that some national Courts defend against EU (and ECHR)- it is not a matter of «legitimacy» or «patriotism» but of using a «lower rank» instrument (accession treaty) to interfere with a treaty rule: the identical issue is for States who have a «rigid» constitution (alike the Treaty binds the CIEU): the accession treaty to ECHR or EU has a «lower rank» than the Constitution itself, so that the national Constitutional Court can not accept it can derogate to a higher ranking rule - usually they will find a way to reconcile the «construction» of the two set of rules, but if they are requested of an opinion on the point of principle, they will always say that in the very end, if all other paths have been explored to avoid the conflict, eventually it is the Constitution and neither ECHR nor EUwhich prevails.

The defects in our national law conflict with the superior Community law requirement that the insurance cover afforded to third parties should embrace any use to which the vehicle is put and that the effects of any breach of policy term by the user should be confined to the insurer and its policyholder.

Thus, several influential voices in the national security community, including former Director of National Intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, and former General Counsel for the National Security Agency, Stewart Baker, have claimed that the law of war is «inadequate» or «irrelevant» in the context of cyber conflict (Nakashima, 2010; Gjeltennational security community, including former Director of National Intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, and former General Counsel for the National Security Agency, Stewart Baker, have claimed that the law of war is «inadequate» or «irrelevant» in the context of cyber conflict (Nakashima, 2010; GjeltenNational Intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, and former General Counsel for the National Security Agency, Stewart Baker, have claimed that the law of war is «inadequate» or «irrelevant» in the context of cyber conflict (Nakashima, 2010; GjeltenNational Security Agency, Stewart Baker, have claimed that the law of war is «inadequate» or «irrelevant» in the context of cyber conflict (Nakashima, 2010; Gjelten, 2010).

Because of an identified real or perceived conflict with national law.

CONFLICT BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS AND EC LAW As seen in previous monthly rants, the ECJ has handed down judgments in industrial action cases giving strong preference to basic rules of EC law where they are threatened by action taken by trade unions to protect wage rates in higher - wage economies from competition from organisations from lower - wage economies using their own national laboLAW As seen in previous monthly rants, the ECJ has handed down judgments in industrial action cases giving strong preference to basic rules of EC law where they are threatened by action taken by trade unions to protect wage rates in higher - wage economies from competition from organisations from lower - wage economies using their own national labolaw where they are threatened by action taken by trade unions to protect wage rates in higher - wage economies from competition from organisations from lower - wage economies using their own national labour.

Some people think that if the law of conflicts of interest were loosened, a wave of national mergers would soon follow.

However, «If the national court were thus to come to the view that the obligation to disapply the provisions of the Criminal Code at issue conflicts with the principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law, it would not be obliged to comply with that obligation, even if compliance with the obligation allowed a national situation incompatible with EU law to be remedied»: in fact, it is for the national legislature to take the necessary measures.

Papa & Roberts, PLLC is a Middle Tennessee based law firm and mediation provider, located conveniently in Brentwood, Tennessee, only minutes from Franklin, Nashville and other parts of middle Tennessee, committed to providing you with local area and national resources to help you through your business and organizational conflicts, divorce, and other life or organizational transitions.

The Family Law Section of the American Bar Association and the National Council of Dispute Resolution Organizations (an umbrella organization which includes the Academy of Family Mediators, the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolution, AFCC, Conflict Resolution Education Network, the National Association for Community Mediation, the National Conference on Peacemaking and Conflict Resolution, and the Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution) joined AFCC in co-convening the Model Standards Symposium.

Maren regularly pursues advanced training and course work in family law and mediation and is currently an active member of numerous professional organizations, including the American Bar Association, the New York State Bar Association, and the National Association for Conflict Resolution.

He is on the part - time faculty at the Pepperdine University School of Law and on the part - time faculty of the National Judicial College and is the senior family mediator at the National Conflict Resolution Center.

He teaches part - time at Pepperdine University School of Law, the National Judicial College, as well as private training sessions for professionals worldwide on the subject of managing high - conflict personalities and high - conflict disputes.

Against a national backdrop of policymaking that often appears to willfully ignore clear and compelling data, it is important to note that 17 states have laws on abortion that match at least five of 10 major categories of restrictions that conflict with scientific evidence.

National AFCC partners include the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, Hofstra Law School Center for Children, Families and the Law, Battered Women's Justice Project, Werner Institute for Negotiation and Conflict Resolution, University of Baltimore School of Law Center for Children, Families and the Courts, Loyola University Chicago School of Law's Civitas ChildLaw Center, Resolution Systems Institute and Marquette University Law School Dispute Resolution Program.