Opinion: Wynne is wrong when she claims
the Conservative carbon tax plan will cost families more than cap and trade and do less to cut emissions
Not exact matches
The
Conservatives bought radio ads last year accusing NDP leader Thomas Mulcair, who backed cap and trade during his leadership bid, of a «
carbon tax»
plan that «would make everything you need cost more.»
Steyer also dismissed the idea of swapping the Clean Power
Plan for a
carbon tax, a concept favored by several
conservative and libertarian think tanks.
A group of prominent Republicans released a «
conservative»
plan to reduce
carbon dioxide emissions today, arguing that replacing Obama - era policies with a
carbon -
tax - and - dividend system would be a politically feasible way to fight off the worst effects of climate change.
While the
carbon tax plan is drawing attention now, the idea itself is not new in
conservative circles.
But if the Clean Power
Plan is so anemic, why in the world would
conservatives entertain the idea of replacing it with a much more robust and ambitious
carbon tax, particularly when that
tax would almost certainly impose more net costs on the economy than the CPP as it is written at present?
Conservatives who support, or at least are willing to consider,
taxing carbon emissions (yes, there are some) fall into two camps on revenue treatment: backing the
carbon dividend
plan proposed by the Climate Leadership Council (which in turn draws on the fee - and - dividend approach espoused by the Citizens Climate Lobby); or urging that the
carbon revenues be applied to reduce the U.S. corporate income
tax.
Conservative MP Michael Chong, known as a more independent - minded politician than most, is bucking his federal counterparts by making his «revenue negative»
carbon tax plan the centrepiece of his leadership campaign.