Not exact matches
What
conservatives and libertarians are most animated about nowadays is the abuse of
public - good authority, particularly as such authority has been misused
for a very long time to tax and
spend, not generally on
public goods like defense but on wealth - transfer programs, such as social security, Medicare and Medicaid, and other entitlements — the kinds of programs, in other words, that have effectively bankrupted Greece, are threatening to bankrupt several other European nations, and are undermining the European Monetary Union.
Of course, it is true that population growth of any kind puts pressure on infrastructure, but in reality falling investment in
public services represents a political choice by the current
Conservative government, which has opted to
spend the tax revenues generated by immigrants and refugees on tax cuts
for businesses and reducing the deficit rather than expanding healthcare and education provision.
As the Institute
for Fiscal Studies has recently described, the
Conservatives» plans
for public spending from this year onwards would make it the «tightest five - year period since (at least) World War Two» whilst Liberal Democrat and Labour plans would see the «tightest four - year period since April 1976».
Gov. Andrew Cuomo's administration and the legislature are
spending around $ 1.3 million this year in payments to private law firms, and the
public is paying
for it, says a fiscally
conservative study center.
Between April and September 2016, ahead of last year's Assembly and Senate elections, the Legislature
spent $ 7 million just on bulk postage
for mailings to constituents, according to a recent report by the fiscally
conservative Empire Center
for Public Policy.
Remarks he had made at a private meeting of
Conservative Way Forward - in which he suggested that the party could make greater
public spending cuts than those to which it had publicly committed itself - were leaked to the media and his resignation as a party deputy chairman was not enough
for Michael Howard.
Ipsos MORI polling backs this up with the
Conservatives holding a considerable lead over Labour throughout 2009 and 2010 in terms of being seen as the party that would be most effective in getting good value
for the
public money it
spends.
The
Conservatives and Labour are virtually tied in terms of being seen as the party that would be most effective in getting good value
for the
public money it would
spend in government: 38 % choose the
Conservatives and 36 % Labour.
The White House budget office has drafted a hit list of programs that Trump could eliminate to trim domestic
spending, including longstanding
conservative targets like the Corporation
for Public Broadcasting, the Legal Services Corporation, AmeriCorps and the National Endowments
for the Arts and the Humanities.
Have things reached the perverse situation where in order to get elected Labour have to cut
public spending for their first term although they want to increase it and the
Conservatives have to increase
public spending in order to get elected, usually when people vote
for a different party it is because they expect something to be different from the way it was, such plans leave it wide open
for the Liberal Democrats to come out and propose a series of economy measures and be the one of the 3 parties proposing the lowest levels of
public spending and tax cuts targeted at the poor.
Where two years ago Cameron the «liberal
Conservative» seemed to be Nick Clegg's kind of guy, they are now at odds over the need
for public spending cuts.
The IFS said that
for all the
Conservatives» warnings about
public finances, Labour would meet its target to eliminate the deficit on day - to - day
spending with # 21bn to spare.
But 90 percent of that highway and bridge
spending was already included in the state Department of Transportations 5 - year capital plan last year, according to E.J. McMahon of the Empire Center
for Public Policy, a
conservative think tank.
E.J. McMahon, president of the fiscally
conservative Empire Center
for Public Policy, said that the number of million - dollar earners may be up but that more and more wealthy New Yorkers are declaring themselves to be only part - year residents of the Empire State — members of the «183 club» that
spends at least that many days (half a year) living elsewhere.
The first reason is that, almost three years after Gordon Brown left Downing Street, more people still blame Labour rather than the
Conservatives for the state of the economy and the
public spending cuts that Osborne has imposed.
The
Conservatives would tear up gold - plated pension deals
for highly paid
public sector workers as part of a wider
spending squeeze.
He frequently sparred with
conservative governors George Deukmejian, then Pete Wilson, who were intent on slashing state education
spending in a state that used to rank in the top 10 in financial support
for public schools.
After
spending hundreds of millions on lobbying, these groups were able to persuade tea - bag and
conservative Republican governors and legislatures to repeal collective bargaining
for teachers, limited bargaining rights
for others, dramatically expanded funding
for charter schools or otherwise undermine what most would describe as the American
public education system.
The Fordham Institute estimated that the CCSS cost $ 12.1 billion from 2012 to 2015.27 The
conservative Pioneer Institute and American Principles Project estimate a mid-range cost of $ 15.8 billion over seven years
for the CCSS, with $ 1.2 billion
spent on assessments, $ 5.3 billion on professional development, and $ 6.9 billion
for tech infrastructure and support.28 According to the New York Times, in part due to the CCSS, venture capital investment in
public education has increased 80 percent since 2005, to a total of $ 632 million in 2012, a figure that has no doubt increased since.29 Bill Gates and Microsoft have cashed in on this lucrative market: in February 2014, Microsoft announced it was partnering with Pearson to install Pearson's Common Core materials onto Microsoft's Surface tablet.30
«The
Conservatives have
spent millions of
public dollars to push
for a pipeline that will export Canadian jobs, trample First Nations rights undermine domestic industrial policy and is bad
for the environment» said CEP National President Dave Coles.