Not exact matches
• State and federal programs like CCSS, RTTT, and the Partnership for Assessment of
Readiness for
College and Careers and Smarter Balanced Assessment
Consortia (groups of states who had adopted CCSS and agreed to work together
on developing aligned, shared assessments) slowed down the market for content, assessments, and platforms in some ways.
Notable recently were the Gates Foundation's call for a two - year moratorium
on tying results from assessments aligned to the Common Core to consequences for teachers or students; Florida's legislation to eliminate consequences for schools that receive low grades
on the state's pioneering A-F school grading system; the teetering of the multi-state Partnership for Assessment of
Readiness for
College and Careers (PARCC) assessment
consortium (down from 24 to 15 members, and with its contract with Pearson to deliver the assessments in limbo because of a lawsuit that alleges bid - rigging); and the groundswell of opposition from parents, teachers, and political groups to the content of the Common Core.
In a new article in Education Next, we examine why states have abandoned the assessments (designed by the federally funded Smarter Balanced Assessment
Consortia (SBAC) and Partnership for Assessments of
Readiness for
College and Careers (PARCC)-RRB- even as they continue to embrace the standards
on which the assessments are based.
On next - generation assessments: PARCC [the Partnership for the Assessment of
Readiness for
College and Career, the assessment
consortia to which Louisiana belongs] is going to affect the number of students completing tests successfully.
Finally, re your comment
on MA's SSPI considering the
consortium assessments as de facto
college readiness metrics, I think the grade 11 tests that are being developed will receive a lot of scrutiny once folks get to see what they are.
The
consortia's plans state that the results from the assessments will indicate whether students are
on track for
college and career
readiness.