Heather Briccetti, president of the Business Council of New York, wrote in a letter to Cuomo last week that the state has had more than enough time to review
the Constitution pipeline permits, saying «it is time to fulfill the state's responsibility and not obstruct the buildout of necessary energy infrastructure.»
Not exact matches
The U.S. Supreme Court dealt another setback to a proposed natural gas
pipeline running from Pennsylvania to New York, rejecting
Constitution Pipeline Co's bid to challenge New York state's refusal to issue a needed water
permit for the project.
Constitution Pipeline said in a statement that it is analyzing the DEC decision to deny environmental quality
permits for the company's $ 750 million natural gas
pipeline and may appeal.
Then, on Earth Day in April, Governor Cuomo's environmental agency denied a key
permit to the
Constitution pipeline, which would have traversed Pennsylvania and upstate New York, saying it could not guarantee that the water nearby would be safe.
In April of this year, the DEC denied a water quality
permit to the
Constitution pipeline, saying it «failed to provide sufficient information to demonstrate compliance with New York State water quality standards.»
Then in April, on Earth Day, Gov. Andrew Cuomo's environmental agency denied a key
permit to the
Constitution pipeline, which would have traversed Pennsylvania and upstate New York, saying it could not guarantee that the water nearby would be safe.
Then, on Earth Day, in April - Governor Cuomo's environmental agency denied a key
permit for the
Constitution pipeline, which would have traversed Pennsylvania and upstate New York, saying it could not guarantee that the water nearby would be safe.
«Treating this
pipeline facility and company differently than all other regulated projects and entities that operate in Vermont would arguably run afoul of federal pre-emption principles that explicitly bar states from regulating oil
pipeline safety; potentially constitute an impermissible attempt to nullify the President's exercise of his foreign affairs power under the U.S.
Constitution as reflected in the Presidential
Permits issued to Portland Pipe Line and potentially impose an unconstitutional burden on foreign or interstate commerce.»
In addition to a hydraulic fracturing ban, New York politicians have put the brakes on
pipeline projects through their
permitting power, blocking the
Constitution and Northern Access
pipelines outright.
So calling for Kinder Morgan Inc.'s
pipeline expansion megaproject to be halted — whether or not that is sound policy — is clearly
permitted by the
Constitution, as is organizing large protests against the project.