«
Constitutional democracy means that institutions have different jobs to do and Parliament has its job to do, which is a very important job — to put before Parliament and vote on laws in accordance with the views of the government of the day and their representatives.
Not exact matches
Thus we had, at the same time and often by the same people, a decrying of judicial usurpation and paeans of thanksgiving that the Supreme Court had spared us the awful prospect of self - government through the
constitutional means of representative
democracy.
It is considered by some parties as illegitimate, posing a serious danger to Japan's
democracy since the Prime Minister circumvented the
constitutional amendment procedure, dictating a radical change to the
meaning of fundamental principles in the Constitution by way of Cabinet fiat without Diet debate, vote, or public approval.
In
constitutional democracy, the powers of the rulers are regulated by legal
means so that the rights of the minorities and the weak are protected and respected.
He saw
democracy and
Constitutional rule as the only way to preserve personal liberty, encourage prosperity and initiative and «afford the best
means possible to elevate our race» — by which he
meant, the human race.
For human rights lawyers, to be able to focus more time on their tactical approach in an increased number of cases may
mean not just more wins, but furthering the push towards
democracy and
constitutional governance.
The fact that Canada and the United States ostensibly are
constitutional democracies signifies that «the rule of law»
means indigenous territorial sovereignty continues to bind all courts of those countries unless and until the constitutions have been amended by the people, by
constitutional legislation, pursuant to the amendment formulas made express and explicit in each constitution.
If we have any hope of changing the dynamic in this country, we have to start with basic legal education — an education about what it
means to have a
constitutional democracy, that is based on three separate, but independent, equal branches of government.»
Back in 2007, Justice Scalia came to Montreal, to debate his Canadian colleague, Justice Binnie, about the role of a judge in a
democracy — which they both took to
mean constitutional interpretation.