Sentences with phrase «convention right to freedom of expression»

Section 12 (4) provides that the court must have particular regard to the importance of the Convention right to freedom of expression and where the proceedings relate to journalistic, literary or artistic material or to conduct connected with such material, the court has to have regard to the extent to which the material has, or is about to become available to the public, if it is or would be in the public interest for the material to be published, and any relevant privacy code.

HRA 1998, s 12 applies if the court is considering whether to grant any relief, which if granted might affect the exercise of the Convention right to freedom of expression.

Not exact matches

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child recognizes that those under the age of 18 often need special protection, but vitally, they also «have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kind...».

The various Articles of the Convention proclaim the following: the right to life (Article 2); the prohibition of torture (Article 3); the prohibition of slavery and forced labour (Article 4); the right to liberty and security (Article 5); the right to a fair trial (Article 6); the prohibition of extra-legal punishment (Article 7); the right to respect for private and family life (Article 8); freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9); freedom of expression (Article 10); freedom of assembly and association (Article 11); the right to marry (Article 12); the prohibition of discrimination (Article 14).

Therefore the Court found that expressing this kind of opinions does not fall under the protection of the freedom of expression according to article 10 (1) of the European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

The content of the cases is not only relevant to Articles 9 and 2 Protocol 1 but also questions the violation or not of other articles of the ECHR such as the Prohibition of Discrimination in Article 14, the Freedom of expression in Article 10 and the Right to respect the private and family life in Article 8 of the Convention.

However, if the government does decide to increase regulation, serious issues arise as to how this would be balanced with the right to Freedom of Expression under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR),» says Luke.

Despite Fleet Street's vocal protestations that Eady J is placing undue weight on Art 8 (which guarantees the right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights at the expense of Art 10 (which protects the right of freedom of expression) the reality is somewhat diff erent.

The codes of conduct need to strike a careful balance between allowing freedom of expression (which is a fundamental right of all UK citizens enshrined under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights), and protecting the rights of other individuals and employees not to be subject to harassment or inappropriate coRights), and protecting the rights of other individuals and employees not to be subject to harassment or inappropriate corights of other individuals and employees not to be subject to harassment or inappropriate comment.

Mr Justice Males undertook the balancing exercise between the rights to private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the right to freedom of expression under Articrights to private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the right to freedom of expression under ArticRights and the right to freedom of expression under Article 10.

Given the right to freedom of expression guaranteed by Art 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the result seemed a foregone conclusion.

Stubbings appealed to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), alleging breaches of Arts 6 (right to fair trial), 8 (freedom of expression) and 14 (freedom from discrimination) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Those interested in European law or in freedom of expression might want to take a look at documents from «The European Protection of Freedom of Expression: Some Recent Restrictive Trends», a recent seminar at the European Court of Human Rights, which was directed at the question: «Are recent developments in the Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights case - law undermining adequate guarantees for freedom of expression?freedom of expression might want to take a look at documents from «The European Protection of Freedom of Expression: Some Recent Restrictive Trends», a recent seminar at the European Court of Human Rights, which was directed at the question: «Are recent developments in the Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights case - law undermining adequate guarantees for freedom of expressiexpression might want to take a look at documents from «The European Protection of Freedom of Expression: Some Recent Restrictive Trends», a recent seminar at the European Court of Human Rights, which was directed at the question: «Are recent developments in the Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights case - law undermining adequate guarantees for freedom of expression?Freedom of Expression: Some Recent Restrictive Trends», a recent seminar at the European Court of Human Rights, which was directed at the question: «Are recent developments in the Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights case - law undermining adequate guarantees for freedom of expressiExpression: Some Recent Restrictive Trends», a recent seminar at the European Court of Human Rights, which was directed at the question: «Are recent developments in the Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights case - law undermining adequate guarantees for freedom of expression?freedom of expressionexpression?»

The statutory powers available to the commissioner of police under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (SOCPA 2005), s 134 can be exercised by a subordinate on his behalf; where the conditions imposed on a demonstration under SOCPA 2005 are unworkable, they will be found to be ultra vires or in breach of Arts 10 and 11 (rights to freedom of expression and assembly) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convenrights to freedom of expression and assembly) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the ConvenRights (the Convention).