By Valerie Strauss July 26, 2010; 11:30 AM ET Categories: Daniel Willingham, Guest Bloggers, National Standards Tags: analysis and common core standareds, common core standards, criticism and common core standards, daniel willingham, national standards, no child left behind and legacy, what's missing from common
core standards Save & Share: Previous: The problem with how Rhee fired teachers Next: Civil rights groups skewer Obama education policy (updated)
And in fact, the Common
Core standards save estimation until after students have mastered their math facts.
Not exact matches
I also should note that researchers in this study clearly conducted this study with similar a priori conclusions in mind (i.e., that the Common
Core should be
saved / promoted); hence, future peer review of this piece may be out of the question as the bias evident in the sets of findings would certainly be a «methodological issue,» again, likely preventing a peer - reviewed publication (see, for example, the a priori conclusion that «[this] study highlights an important advantage of having a common set of
standards and assessments across multiple states,» in the abstract (p. 3).
By Valerie Strauss August 9, 2010; 11:00 AM ET Categories: Daniel Willingham, Guest Bloggers, National
Standards Tags: common
core standards, daniel willingham
Save & Share: Previous: Education Reformers vs. «New Reformers» Next: The truth behind the get - tough success stories in school reform
Savings From STAR Suspension Would Net About $ 15 Million A plan to suspend some statewide testing in advance of transition to new assessments based on the common
core standards would
save the state about $ 15 million, according to an estimate released Monday by the California Department of Education.
Save some cash and go with the Intel Graphics 530 option that comes
standard with Intel
Core i5 - 6440HQ configurations.