The low rate environment and continued demand for yield generating asset classes has pushed the S&P U.S. Issued High Yield
Corporate Bond Index returns to 4.32 % year to date as yields have fallen by 38bps since year end.
The rising interest rates also affect credit as the S&P U.S. Issued Investment Grade
Corporate Bond Index returns a -1.98 % month - to - date return and a -0.39 % year - to - date.
US
Corporate Bond index returns use Bank of America Merrill Lynch Index data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED).
The S&P Indonesia
Corporate Bond Index returned 4.14 % YTD and 10.89 % over the one - year period.
Junk corporate bonds tracked in the S&P U.S. Issued High Yield
Corporate Bond Index returned 2.65 %.
The corporate bonds of the companies in the S&P 500 have also seen positive returns with the S&P 500 Investment Grade
Corporate Bond Index returning over 1.25 % for June so far.
The higher yielding sectors of Energy, Materials, Telecommunications and Utilities combine for a weight of 24 % of the index and each sector has seen robust performance in 2016 so far, The two leading sectors are the S&P 500 Energy
Corporate Bond Index returning over 16 % year - to - date and the S&P 500 Materials
Corporate Bond Index returning over 14 %.
High yield bonds ended in the red in November, as the S&P U.S. Issued High Yield
Corporate Bond Index returned -0.63 % for the month.
Very little curve movement for this month has the S&P U.S. Issued Investment Grade
Corporate Bond Index returning only 0.22 % for the month.
With oil back up at USD 50 (as quoted by the NYMEX light sweet crude oil futures), the energy sector (15 %) of the S&P U.S. Issued High Yield
Corporate Bond Index returned 5.73 % in February.
The S&P U.S. Issued High Yield
Corporate Bond Index returned 1 % last week and a 0.43 % the week before to recover the loss incurred the last week of July -LRB--1.38 %).
Not exact matches
For U.S.
bond market returns, we use the S&P High Grade Corporate Index from 1926 through 1968, the Citigroup High Grade Index from 1969 through 1972, the Lehman Brothers U.S. Long Credit AA Index from 1973 through 1975, the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index from 1976 through 2009, and the Spliced Barclays U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Bond Index thereaf
bond market
returns, we use the S&P High Grade
Corporate Index from 1926 through 1968, the Citigroup High Grade
Index from 1969 through 1972, the Lehman Brothers U.S. Long Credit AA
Index from 1973 through 1975, the Barclays U.S. Aggregate
Bond Index from 1976 through 2009, and the Spliced Barclays U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Bond Index thereaf
Bond Index from 1976 through 2009, and the Spliced Barclays U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted
Bond Index thereaf
Bond Index thereafter.
High - yield
bonds delivered another year of strong performance in 2017, with the benchmark Bloomberg Barclays US
Corporate High Yield 2 % Issuer Capped
Index returning 7.2 % as we approached year - end.
iShares S&P ® / TSX ® 60
Index Fund («XIU»), iShares S&P / TSX Capped Composite
Index Fund («XIC»), iShares S&P / TSX Completion
Index Fund («XMD»), iShares S&P / TSX SmallCap
Index Fund («XCS»), iShares S&P / TSX Capped Energy
Index Fund («XEG»), iShares S&P / TSX Capped Financials
Index Fund («XFN»), iShares S&P / TSX Global Gold
Index Fund («XGD»), iShares S&P / TSX Capped Information Technology
Index Fund («XIT»), iShares S&P / TSX Capped REIT
Index Fund («XRE»), iShares S&P / TSX Capped Materials
Index Fund («XMA»), iShares Diversified Monthly Income Fund («XTR»), iShares S&P 500
Index Fund (CAD - Hedged)(«XSP»), iShares Jantzi Social
Index Fund («XEN»), iShares Dow Jones Select Dividend
Index Fund («XDV»), iShares Dow Jones Canada Select Growth
Index Fund («XCG»), iShares Dow Jones Canada Select Value
Index Fund («XCV»), iShares DEX Universe
Bond Index Fund («XBB»), iShares DEX Short Term
Bond Index Fund («XSB»), iShares DEX Real
Return Bond Index Fund («XRB»), iShares DEX Long Term
Bond Index Fund («XLB»), iShares DEX All Government
Bond Index Fund («XGB»), and iShares DEX All
Corporate Bond Index Fund («XCB»), iShares MSCI EAFE ®
Index Fund (CAD - Hedged)(«XIN»), iShares Russell 2000 ®
Index Fund (CAD - Hedged)(«XSU»), iShares Conservative Core Portfolio Builder Fund («XCR»), iShares Growth Core Portfolio Builder Fund («XGR»), iShares Global Completion Portfolio Builder Fund («XGC»), iShares Alternatives Completion Portfolio Builder Fund («XAL»), iShares MSCI Emerging Markets
Index Fund («XEM») and iShares MSCI World
Index Fund («XWD»), iShares MSCI Brazil
Index Fund («XBZ»), iShares China
Index Fund («XCH»), iShares S&P CNX Nifty India
Index Fund («XID»), iShares S&P Latin America 40
Index Fund («XLA»), iShares U.S. High Yield
Bond Index Fund (CAD - Hedged)(«XHY»), iShares U.S. IG
Corporate Bond Index Fund (CAD - Hedged)(«XIG»), iShares DEX HYBrid
Bond Index Fund («XHB»), iShares S&P / TSX North American Preferred Stock
Index Fund (CAD - Hedged)(«XPF»), iShares S&P / TSX Equity Income
Index Fund («XEI»), iShares S&P / TSX Capped Consumer Staples
Index Fund («XST»), iShares Capped Utilities
Index Fund («XUT»), iShares S&P / TSX Global Base Metals
Index Fund («XBM»), iShares S&P Global Healthcare
Index Fund (CAD - Hedged)(«XHC»), iShares NASDAQ 100
Index Fund (CAD - Hedged)(«XQQ») and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets
Bond Index Fund (CAD - Hedged)(«XEB»)(collectively, the «Funds») may or may not be suitable for all investors.
I'll probably do 40 % in government
bonds, 25 %
corporate bonds, 25 % S&P
index and 10 % in a dividend stock
index and expect closer to 4 - 5 % annual
returns.
Those outflows showed up in
returns data, with a Bloomberg Barclay's
Index of U.S.
corporate bonds posting a 2.3 per cent loss for the first three months of the year.
He also noted that it is a very poor time to buy
corporate bonds (high yield
bond index yield 4.93 %) and Gundlach sees a negative
return for the S&P in 2018 as the rates rout eventually gives the equity market the yips.
U.S.
Corporate Bonds & Senior Loans: Only giving up -0.83 % for the month, the S&P / LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100
Index stayed out of the fixed income fray and has
returned a positive 1.99 %, year - to - date.
June 19 and 20 showed the two worst daily
returns of -0.72 % and -0.93 %, respectively for the S&P U.S. Issued Investment Grade
Corporate Bond Index.
In the second quarter so far, the S&P 500 Energy
Index (equity) has
returned over 9.1 % in total
return and the S&P 500 Energy
Corporate Bond Index has
returned over 7.3 %.
Using global industrial production growth as specified, annual total
returns for 30 country, two regional and world stock
indexes, currency spot and one - year forward exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar, spot prices on 19 commodities, total annual
returns for a global government
bond index and a U.S.
corporate bond index, and country inflation rates as available during 1970 through 2013, they find that: Keep Reading
As we near the end of the first quarter, investment grade tax - exempt
bonds tracked in the S&P National AMT - Free Municipal
Bond Index have returned 0.93 % year - to - date underperforming relative to the over 2 % return of the investment grade corporate bond market tracked in the S&P U.S. Investment Grade Corporate Bond In
Bond Index have
returned 0.93 % year - to - date underperforming relative to the over 2 %
return of the investment grade
corporate bond market tracked in the S&P U.S. Investment Grade Corporate Bo
corporate bond market tracked in the S&P U.S. Investment Grade Corporate Bond In
bond market tracked in the S&P U.S. Investment Grade
Corporate Bo
Corporate Bond In
Bond Index.
The S&P 500 High Yield
Corporate Bond Index performance behaved similarly returning 3.43 % for March, which was the index's largest return since a 3.86 % return in October,
Index performance behaved similarly
returning 3.43 % for March, which was the
index's largest return since a 3.86 % return in October,
index's largest
return since a 3.86 %
return in October, 2011.
The S&P 500
Bond Index has returned a modestly negative total return of -0.31 % year - to - date while the energy bond sector tracked in the S&P 500 Energy Corporate Bond Index is down 5.79 % year - to - d
Bond Index has
returned a modestly negative total
return of -0.31 % year - to - date while the energy
bond sector tracked in the S&P 500 Energy Corporate Bond Index is down 5.79 % year - to - d
bond sector tracked in the S&P 500 Energy
Corporate Bond Index is down 5.79 % year - to - d
Bond Index is down 5.79 % year - to - date.
The Bloomberg Barclays US
Corporate High - Yield
Bond Index is an unmanaged broad - based market - value - weighted index that tracks the total return performance of non-investment grade, fixed - rate, publicly placed, dollar denominated and nonconvertible debt registered with the Securities and Exchange Commis
Index is an unmanaged broad - based market - value - weighted
index that tracks the total return performance of non-investment grade, fixed - rate, publicly placed, dollar denominated and nonconvertible debt registered with the Securities and Exchange Commis
index that tracks the total
return performance of non-investment grade, fixed - rate, publicly placed, dollar denominated and nonconvertible debt registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Currently the S&P / LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100
Index has
returned 0.12 % MTD and 2.20 % YTD while the S&P U.S. High Yield
Corporate Bond Index has
returned -0.20 % MTD and 4.78 % YTD.
The S&P U.S. Issued Investment Grade
Corporate Bond Index is
returning 0.6 % month - to - date which is a much better start than all of March's
return of 0.04 %.
The S&P China High Quality
Corporate Bond 3 - 7 Year Index, an investible index tracks the performance of Chinese corporate bonds within three to seven year tenors and uses more stringent rating criteria, has outperformed its boarder benchmark and returned 5.70 % YTD, as of August
Corporate Bond 3 - 7 Year
Index, an investible index tracks the performance of Chinese corporate bonds within three to seven year tenors and uses more stringent rating criteria, has outperformed its boarder benchmark and returned 5.70 % YTD, as of August 27,
Index, an investible
index tracks the performance of Chinese corporate bonds within three to seven year tenors and uses more stringent rating criteria, has outperformed its boarder benchmark and returned 5.70 % YTD, as of August 27,
index tracks the performance of Chinese
corporate bonds within three to seven year tenors and uses more stringent rating criteria, has outperformed its boarder benchmark and returned 5.70 % YTD, as of August
corporate bonds within three to seven year tenors and uses more stringent rating criteria, has outperformed its boarder benchmark and
returned 5.70 % YTD, as of August 27, 2015.
As mentioned, the S&P U.S. Issued High Yield
Corporate Bond Index has
returned 5.38 % year - to - date.
The
bonds of larger entities tracked in the S&P 500 High Yield
Corporate Bond Index have
returned 15.57 % year - to - date modestly out performing the broader S&P U.S. High Yield
Corporate Bond Index.
As you can see in Steady as she goes above, the DEX Universe
Bond Index, which includes Canadian government and
corporate bonds, had just two negative years in the last three decades (1994 and 1999), while averaging
returns of about 9.9 % a year.
The S&P U.K. Investment Grade
Corporate Bond Index had a YTD
return of 10.75 % as of Dec. 21, 2016, while the S&P U.K. Gilt
Bond Index gained Read more -LSB-...]
The back - tested results of the 17 - year period ending Feb. 28, 2017, show that the S&P U.S. High Yield Low Volatility
Corporate Bond Index may offer an intersection that bridges the volatility gap between the high - yield and investment - grade bond sectors, with increased return efficie
Bond Index may offer an intersection that bridges the volatility gap between the high - yield and investment - grade
bond sectors, with increased return efficie
bond sectors, with increased
return efficiency.
As Figure 1 shows, the Bloomberg Barclays US
Corporate High Yield
Bond Index posted positive
returns during rising - rate periods, averaging a
return of 8.86 % while the Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate
Bond Index was almost entirely in the red with an average
return of -1.41 %.
The fact that the S&P U.S. High Yield Low Volatility
Corporate Bond Index is located above the straight line linking the investment - grade and high - yield bond sectors demonstrates that the index outperforms the return frontier established by the two bond sect
Bond Index is located above the straight line linking the investment - grade and high - yield bond sectors demonstrates that the index outperforms the return frontier established by the two bond sec
Index is located above the straight line linking the investment - grade and high - yield
bond sectors demonstrates that the index outperforms the return frontier established by the two bond sect
bond sectors demonstrates that the
index outperforms the return frontier established by the two bond sec
index outperforms the
return frontier established by the two
bond sect
bond sectors.
Yields are also higher for the S&P U.S. Issued High Yield
Corporate Bond Index than for the S&P / LSTA Leveraged Loan 100 Index (6.5 % versus 5.05 %, respectively), implying that market participants are willing to hold bank loans for less of an interest return than high - yield corpor
Corporate Bond Index than for the S&P / LSTA Leveraged Loan 100
Index (6.5 % versus 5.05 %, respectively), implying that market participants are willing to hold bank loans for less of an interest
return than high - yield
corporatecorporate debt.
High Yield's month - to - date
return is presently negative at a -0.44 %, while for the year it is
returning a 4.05 % as measured by the S&P U.S. Issued High Yield
Corporate Bond Index.
Let's take a look at the performance relationships between the stocks and the
bonds by using the S&P 500 Energy Total
Return and the S&P 500 Energy
Corporate Bond Index Total Return to see how the market views the equity risk premium, or in other words how strongly the market believes oil stocks will rise (equity performance) or fall (bond performan
Bond Index Total
Return to see how the market views the equity risk premium, or in other words how strongly the market believes oil stocks will rise (equity performance) or fall (
bond performan
bond performance.)
The high - yield
corporate bond segment, as measured by the S&P U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Index, was the top - performing asset class for 2016, posting a total return o
corporate bond segment, as measured by the S&P U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Index, was the top - performing asset class for 2016, posting a total return of 17.
bond segment, as measured by the S&P U.S. High Yield
Corporate Bond Index, was the top - performing asset class for 2016, posting a total return o
Corporate Bond Index, was the top - performing asset class for 2016, posting a total return of 17.
Bond Index, was the top - performing asset class for 2016, posting a total
return of 17.2 %.
Below is a chart of the historical S&P GSCI Energy TR
index levels versus the equity risk premium as measured by the S&P 500 Energy Total Return monthly minus the S&P 500 Energy Corporate Bond Index Total Return mon
index levels versus the equity risk premium as measured by the S&P 500 Energy Total
Return monthly minus the S&P 500 Energy
Corporate Bond Index Total Return mon
Index Total
Return monthly.
Historically the beta of the S&P GSCI Energy Excess
Return (total return — T - bill) to energy stock alpha (S&P 500 Energy — S&P 500) is 1.05 and to energy bond alpha (S&P 500 Energy Corporate Bond Index — T - bill) s is 0.71, with respective correlations of 0.52 and
Return (total
return — T - bill) to energy stock alpha (S&P 500 Energy — S&P 500) is 1.05 and to energy bond alpha (S&P 500 Energy Corporate Bond Index — T - bill) s is 0.71, with respective correlations of 0.52 and
return — T - bill) to energy stock alpha (S&P 500 Energy — S&P 500) is 1.05 and to energy
bond alpha (S&P 500 Energy Corporate Bond Index — T - bill) s is 0.71, with respective correlations of 0.52 and 0
bond alpha (S&P 500 Energy
Corporate Bond Index — T - bill) s is 0.71, with respective correlations of 0.52 and 0
Bond Index — T - bill) s is 0.71, with respective correlations of 0.52 and 0.13.
The S&P U.S. Issued Investment Grade
Corporate Bond Index was down 0.72 % for the day, led by the Atmos Energy Corp. 4.15 % January 2043 bond, whose daily total return was -0.0
Bond Index was down 0.72 % for the day, led by the Atmos Energy Corp. 4.15 % January 2043
bond, whose daily total return was -0.0
bond, whose daily total
return was -0.03 %.
As for total
return performance, the S&P Japan
Corporate Bond Index gained 1.09 % YTD as of Sept. 29, 2016.
The S&P U.S. Issued High Yield
Corporate Bond Index has
returned 0.08 % so far for May after having
returned only 0.67 % for the month of April.
These
returns now pale in comparison to the high yield
index (S&P U.S. Issued High Yield Corporate Bond Index) as the search for yield continues into
index (S&P U.S. Issued High Yield
Corporate Bond Index) as the search for yield continues into
Index) as the search for yield continues into 2014.
As of Aug. 24, 2015, the overall
bond index (S&P 500 Bond Index) has returned 0.39 % for the month and 0.30 % YTD, while the S&P 500 Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index has returned 0.58 % month - to - date and 0.36 % YTD, and the S&P 500 High Yield Corporate Bond Index has returned -1.88 % for the month and -0.64 %
bond index (S&P 500 Bond Index) has returned 0.39 % for the month and 0.30 % YTD, while the S&P 500 Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index has returned 0.58 % month - to - date and 0.36 % YTD, and the S&P 500 High Yield Corporate Bond Index has returned -1.88 % for the month and -0.64 %
index (S&P 500
Bond Index) has returned 0.39 % for the month and 0.30 % YTD, while the S&P 500 Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index has returned 0.58 % month - to - date and 0.36 % YTD, and the S&P 500 High Yield Corporate Bond Index has returned -1.88 % for the month and -0.64 %
Bond Index) has returned 0.39 % for the month and 0.30 % YTD, while the S&P 500 Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index has returned 0.58 % month - to - date and 0.36 % YTD, and the S&P 500 High Yield Corporate Bond Index has returned -1.88 % for the month and -0.64 %
Index) has
returned 0.39 % for the month and 0.30 % YTD, while the S&P 500 Investment Grade
Corporate Bond Index has returned 0.58 % month - to - date and 0.36 % YTD, and the S&P 500 High Yield Corporate Bond Index has returned -1.88 % for the month and -0.64 %
Bond Index has returned 0.58 % month - to - date and 0.36 % YTD, and the S&P 500 High Yield Corporate Bond Index has returned -1.88 % for the month and -0.64 %
Index has
returned 0.58 % month - to - date and 0.36 % YTD, and the S&P 500 High Yield
Corporate Bond Index has returned -1.88 % for the month and -0.64 %
Bond Index has returned -1.88 % for the month and -0.64 %
Index has
returned -1.88 % for the month and -0.64 % YTD.
Starting with the investment grade BBB ratings category, municipal
bonds have had a
return of nearly 3.5 % year - to - date while the large entities tracked in the S&P 500 BBB Investment Grade
Corporate Bond Index has recorded a negative 0.46 %.
Exhibit 1: Total
Return Performance of the S&P China
Bond Index, S&P China Government
Bond Index, and the S&P China
Corporate Bond Index
As shown in exhibit 1, the total
return of the S&P Japan Government
Bond Index and the S&P Japan
Corporate Bond Index both advanced 1.34 % and 1.23 % year - to - date (YTD), as of August 8, 2014.
Over the last five years the S&P U.S. Issued High Yield
Corporate Bond Index has seen annualized
returns of over 13.6 %.