Not exact matches
The Platinum Rule — treat
others as they want to be treated —
corrects that
flaw.
There is no point having PR for both the Commons and Lords — every voting system has some
flaw or
other, so it's better to have different means of election to both chambers if both are elected, with the purpose of each
correcting the
other's
flaws.
This year those breakthroughs include tools for reprogramming living cells and rendering lab animals transparent; ways of powering electronics with sound waves and saliva; smartphone screens that
correct for the
flaws in your vision; Lego - like atomic structures that could produce major advances in superconductivity research; and
others.
(b) If, as an STT, BAT, employer or
other service agent administering the testing process, you become aware of a «correctable
flaw» (see § 40.269) that has not already been
corrected, you must take all practicable action to
correct the problem so that the test is not cancelled.
The
flaw in this argument is that if No Kill opponents are
correct in asserting that an appointment policy will cause intake to go up in
other shelters in the area, then we should see an increase in intake in neighboring shelters in every case where an appointment policy is implemented.
You can then respond by saying but if Dr. Judith Curry is
correct about the fact that there were, or even are,
flaws still in the «Hockey Stick» (as I (and
others) have pointed out over, and over, and over, all models have
flaws, in fact all models are wrong to some degree) then you and she are still barking up the wrong tree.
Here lies some issues too: if a couple of studies being heavily relied upon are being used that have some unknown
flaws the Bayes approach may or may not be able to
correct for those, whereas direct empirical observations can better
correct for such issues, and there are some
other frequentist approaches, though much more tedious, can better control for such errors.
I simply stated that if one assumes that this theory is
correct then one arrives at the conclusion that most of the effect was due to H2O, with a much smaller portion due to CO2 and
other GHGs, and that those like Lacis or Alley (with their «CO2 control knob» posit) are using
flawed logic to attribute essentially the whole natural GH effect to CO2.
paper that got journal editors fired was
flawed in one half of its analysis, but
correct in the
other.
You, on the
other hand, appear to need a story, even a
flawed, incomplete, or totally false one, to take the place of the
correct answer, until (if?)
The New Testament does a much better job than the Old in that regard, but is still obviously
flawed, and
other religions do it at least as well if not better (and that doesn't make them
correct as in true either!)
al. may have believed the results there were
correct, based on their studies, but the studies were all
flawed by relying on a few proxy series which are not good temperature proxies or have
other problems.
Finding
flaws with Mann's methodology, on the
other hand, and bringing them to light (and possibly forcing Mann to
correct things himself) is another thing!
The ICO also announced that they could not prosecute Professor Phil Jones, then - director of the university's Climatic Research unit, and
others implicated in the Climategate scandal because of a
flaw in the statute, which they will now recommend be
corrected by Parliament.