Sentences with phrase «council model policy»

Essentially, our recommendation on topic is to follow the Canadian Judicial Council Model Policy on topic.
POLICY: Ohio lawmaker Bill Seitz is among opponents of American Legislative Exchange Council model policy to block subsidies for alternative fuel vehicles.

Not exact matches

By advocating for policy changes, the Council seeks to create an economic model in which what is good for business is good for the environment and society.
Councils, Committees and Working Groups — led by representatives of our member organizations — determine how to fulfill consumers» needs, help shape the association's policy positions, identify industry - wide model practices, direct scientific research and ensure strong and frequent collaboration among members and with retail trading partners.
Guidance Materials: The state Department of Education, in collaboration with the Dairy Council, created a comprehensive Model School Wellness Policy (2006).
Part of an Australian Research Council funded study titled Being and becoming musical: towards a cultural ecological model of early musical development, the study aims to provide a comprehensive account of how Australian families use music in their parenting practices and make recommendations for policy and practice in childcare and early learning and development.
Governor Cuomo's Regional Councils create a more efficient business model that empowers individual regions to determine what is best for their own communities and incentivizes thoughtful economic policies through competition.
«As a national model, we must maintain our upward momentum to end gender and racial inequality through public policy that celebrates our diversity,» Council Member Cumbo said at the rally, pointing to other city and state efforts like the municipal identification card program and a higher minimum wage.
A model bill for the «Parent Trigger Act» and much of school choice and privatization legislation is designed and promoted by the American Legislative Exchange Council or ALEC, which coordinates with the State Policy Network and has become notorious for promoting «stand your ground» legislation and propagating climate change denial.
Citing the research, and the exciting work being done by school library practitioners in realizing the vision of the new school library learning commons, the expert panel recommended that «the Council of Ministers of Education Canada (CMEC) commission a pan-Canadian assessment engaging the full range of stakeholders, to bring forward a clear and prescriptive set of directives to frame a national policy consensus on the most appropriate model for school libraries / learning commons to maximize their contribution to the K - 12 experience and its learning outcomes.»
The expert panel made a call for the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC) to frame a national policy consensus on the most appropriate model for school library / learning commons, and for provincial ministries of education to provide sustainable funding for such a model.
Brian has been involved with creating policies, models, and criteria for promoting validity, reliability, and credibility in both assessments and accountability systems through work with groups such as the U.S. Department of Education (co-author of Accountability Peer Review guidance; Growth Model Pilot guidance), Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO)(author of documents on the design of accountability systems and balanced assessment systems), National Center for Educational Outcomes (NCEO)(author of research reports on standardization and reliability for assessment systems for students with disabilities), and several state Technical Advisory Committees.
Most of these «policies,» generated by lobbyists at the Foundation for Florida's Future, are designated «model» legislation endorsed by the American Legislative Exchange Council and State Policy Institutes.
The conservative American Legislative Exchange Council, which helps lawmakers write model legislation, released model policy language on Education Savings Accounts in 2016.
In addition, they align with the Teacher Leader Model Standards from the Council of Chief State School Officers and with the Professional Standards for Educational Leaders from the National Policy Board for Educational Administration.
The conservative group American Legislative Exchange Council, which helps lawmakers write model legislation, released model policy language on Education Savings Accounts this year.
Central to this model is an «advisory council or task force representing a wide spectrum of community concerns and perspectives» whose members review available dog bite data, current laws, and «sources of ineffectiveness» and recommend realistic and enforceable policy, coupled with outreach to the media and educational efforts directed at those in regular contact with «dog owners and potential victims» (e.g., medical and veterinary professionals, animal control / shelters, teachers)(AVMA, 2001).
Synapse modeled a «reference case» in which the utility meets its existing city council - mandated targets for generation capacity, storage, GHG reductions and its other policy - imposed obligations, along with two other cases.
The other is from the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC): «Shared Renewable Energy for Low - to Moderate - Income Consumers: Policy Guidelines and Model Provisions.»
The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) recently released a model resolution calling for the weakening of solar net metering policies that threaten the traditional utility industry business model.
The analysis followed by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner is largely based on the «Model Policy for Access to Court Records in Canada» (the «Model Policy») prepared by the Judges» Technology Advisory Committee of the Canadian Judicial Council (the «CJC») in 2005.
It was accepted that the orders had implemented the first defendant lord chancellor's prior policy decision (the decision) that the principle of «full cost recovery» in setting court fees (the principle) should be applied to public law family proceedings; that the rationale for the decision had been a wish to fix fees at a level which reflected the true cost to the courts services and to replace the then extant model which involved heavy subsidisation; and that s 92 of the Courts Act 2003 (CA 2003) was relevant insofar as it empowered the lord chancellor to prescribe court fees by order, and that it set out obligations to «consult» specified judicial persons, the Civil Justice Council in civil proceedings, and «persons likely to have to pay [fees]», prior to the making of any orders.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z