Sentences with phrase «couple more questions»

I have a couple more questions.

Couple more questions, then we're going to get some questions from some of our audience.

Listen, before we move on and I ask you a couple more questions, let's take a quick break, don't fast forward me listeners, and hear a word from a couple of our sponsors.

I have a couple more questions, and then I will give someone else a go.

But even this scene then just asks us to ask a couple more questions before we inevitably get the number.

A couple more questions verified that Sis was, in fact, giving the recommended dose of it.

I do have a couple more questions.

So could I ask a couple more questions about your diet?

We're coming up on the end of the show, and I want to ask a couple more questions.

Dr. Justin Marchegiani: 100 % I got a couple more questions.

You wan na hit a couple more questions or should we try to move the conversation into some more nutrients.

To help create a great TeenLife experience for you, we need to ask a couple more questions.

Well ask her a couple more questions and you can get that from our Parent Savers Club.

Not exact matches

As Elliott ramped up its pressure on Arconic, friends and colleagues of Kleinfeld, along with board members of Arconic, reported more suspicious run - ins: Others who live near the CEO were followed to a local restaurant by strangers who then approached the couple; they claimed to be considering investing with Kleinfeld, but first had a few questions.

Separately, some Republican senators were questioning the repeal of a 40 percent inheritance tax levied on estates worth more than $ 5.5 million, or $ 11 million for married couples — a tax paid only by the wealthiest American taxpayers, or about 0.2 percent of Americans, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a research and policy institute.

Done well, this process — which shouldn't take more than a couple of hours — will give you an extraordinarily effective and quick method to answer these questions and look like a content marketing genius to your boss or your client.

The team conducts couple's court with a couple that is debating on the perfect time to meet the parents, gives advice on how to improve your relationships, answers a listener's question about a couple with separate bank accounts and a lot more!

We've really only had a couple hundred years to examine these scientific questions and already have way more theories that have actual facts and clues backing them up that evolution did happen and the universe did bang, etc..

It's a place that fiddles with the liturgy to make it more «inclusive,» affirms gay couples, and takes a generally liberal line on social and political questions (with the exception of abortion).

And a couple more which have answered some of my long - standing questions are Lesslie Newbigin, Proper Confidence, and Nancey Murphy, Beyond Liberalism and Fundamentalism.

(because we tried a couple of them already with chocolate and coconut or hazelnut cover, and they taste great:)-RRB- Another question: could you recommend irish moss, because this is the first time I try it, and I bought this in Czech Republic (it was the last pack), so I definitely would like to experiment more:)-RRB-, but it's hard to choose from the online selection.

I have a couple questions about this recipe and using what I have on hand because I want to make it NOW instead of waiting 2 more weeks until next paycheck to get EXACT ingredients.

They can use another slugger in the middle of the order because every team can, but also because there are more than a couple of questions when it comes to how they'll keep scoring their runs.

The only question I have at this point is why in the hell can't this kid get more than a couple of carries each game?

The sad truth is that we are just a couple of players away from having a very strong starting 11... Wenger's fixation with Walcott and mertesakher as starting players remains a mystery to me... neither have the quality of a top team like arsenal... I am not a giroud hater but he is still too inconsistent and the big question is whether welbeck can push him in a way Walcott won't... Campbell has done well and has moved ahead of Walcott and, ox for sure but there is still a question about how much more he can improve... Elneny is certainly an upgrade over arteta and flamini whether he will make it I don't know just hope that he does but arguably wenger could have been more ambitious... That leaves a top quality striking option... There is no doubt that wenger deluded himself over the summer and that needs to be corrected ASAP... Draxler dybala aube and even griezman with a big enough big could have been prized in summer... january not a good time for this but it is not difficult to find better options than Walcott ox or Campbell... All a question of whether wenger wants to win EPL on his terms or wants to win this for the club

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The question is why they wouldn't you just move Treinen to low leverage situations now that they have 2 more guys in the pen instead of trading him away, especially when you are getting a guy like Doolittle who has barely played due to injuries over the last couple seasons.

We have been linked to top players but I seriously doubt Wenger has said no to them or refuses to pay a couple million more, he has never shown that ignorance in the past so it leads to the question of!

And while many worried about how the legalization of marriage for same - sex couples would be a «slippery slope» to marriage among more than two partners, my question is — why is that a bad thing if it's among consenting adults, especially if it would benefit women?

So Kevin, I asked a couple of really simple (and I think fair) questions below, to try to make sure that I had all the facts before addressing anything more.

We have moms that try the tips we give and come back a couple of days later and report how they did, or ask more questions.

Here's a couple of articles on more details as to why: http://www.alternative-mama.com/co-sleeping-why-and-how/ and http://www.drmomma.org/2011/02/seven-benefits-of-cosleeping.html — BUT, in short to answer your question, you do not «need» a crib!

This, coupled with the fact that more and more children are being diagnosed with food allergies each year, have doctors concerned, and reveal the need for more research into the question of what exactly causes food allergies.

Thanks Melody for letting me borrow your jar, copy your questions and add a couple dozen more.

If this sounds like an extraordinary leap, consider the question that O'Hara asks in her book: «Other things being equal, which couple is more likely to stay together — one enjoying delicious, satisfying sex or one whose sexual pleasure is being compromised in many ways?»

So doesn't that raise another question: So why didn't the single people have more attachment issues than the coupled people?

Let me ask you a couple of very serious questions... How would your confidence, sense of empowerment, and self esteem be different if you knew how to be a more active participant in your own feminine health?

Most of the follow - up questions (again, in my own experience, YMMV) tend to be about be more about the different «types» of families they know (two moms, two dads, single parents, couples without kids, etc.) and other things that sort of directly impact / involve themselves.

My question is, would it be more effective to make her cry it out every single time she wakes up, even if it means every couple of hours, or will it really work if I have her cry it out for all but one or two of the times she wakes up?

12:23 - Prime minister's questions has calmed down since the main exchanges, although Cameron has made a couple more shouty attacks on Labour's handling of the economy.

Two House Democrats this week fired technology staffers linked to an ongoing criminal investigation, more than a month after the couple in question was barred from House computer networks.

YouGov did the fieldwork for two academic election surveys (the British Election Study and the SCMS) as well as their daily polling, and all three used different question ordering (daily polling asked voting intention first, SCMS after a couple of questions, the BES after a bank of questions on important issues, which party is more trusted and party leaders) so will allow testing of the effect of «priming questions».

I can't see any other questions in the Standard's report, but in the past they've tended to commission polls and then report results over a couple of days, so there may yet be more.

«With this discovery I'll focus for a couple more years to transfer this technology across to other labs in Australia, but I will then bow out: we will have by then answered all the questions that have driven me since my time in Switzerland,» he said.

These are just a couple of the questions I found myself asking when... [Read More...]

I got a couple questions about a more detailed packing list and some of the exact items I mentioned so here it is, my Thanksgiving Weekend Packing List!

Perhaps more concrete questions: I have a conference to attend in three weeks and am willing to invest in a couple of pieces now — most likely a simple black dress and a simple black top.

This works because a) you're letting her know you looked at more than her photos, b) you asked a couple questions, which gives her something to reply to, and c) you are talking about a subject you know she likes.

To start the conversation off well, you don't need more than a couple of insightful and engaging questions in your message.

The first couple of dates with a new girl can be awkward, but they're a lot less awkward when you know the right questions... (read more)