Sentences with phrase «court bail review»

Not exact matches

(Link: https://prnigeria.com/2016/03/yashuaib-resigns-fossra-say-jon-ode-panel-misleading-president-buhari/ May I appeal to Your Excellency to simply review the fact that Sambo Dasuki has been granted bails by three High Courts in Nigeria and that even the ECOWAS Court has also ordered his release yet he has remained in custody.

May I appeal to Your Excellency to simply review the fact that Sambo Dasuki has been granted bails by three High Courts in Nigeria and that even the ECOWAS Court has also ordered his release yet he has remained in custody.

It would also require courts to hold a bail review hearing within 14 days of arraignment, instead of 30 as allowed by current law.

Normally a bail review occurs when an accused person has been denied bail by the courts and wants to appeal this decision.

Once you are denied bail, you may apply to a higher court for a review of the detention order.

Bail Reviews require the accused to follow cumbersome procedures well beyond attending a bail hearing in the lower court, including drafting, serving and filing a variety of court documents and obtaining a Judge's Order to have the jail bring the inmate to coBail Reviews require the accused to follow cumbersome procedures well beyond attending a bail hearing in the lower court, including drafting, serving and filing a variety of court documents and obtaining a Judge's Order to have the jail bring the inmate to cobail hearing in the lower court, including drafting, serving and filing a variety of court documents and obtaining a Judge's Order to have the jail bring the inmate to court.

the criminal law in Canada recognizes your rights to have a bail review in Supreme Court (or higher courts) to rectify the situation.

Mr. Clark has spent years preparing sureties for bail hearings and bail reviews, working closely with all involved with a seasoned anticipation of what the Court will likely be most concerned about and, therefore, what is necessary to secure the accused's release on bail.

As on a Bail Review (see above), the Appellant seeking bail pending appeal must present the Court with a viable Release Plan, through procedures far more onerous than those governing bail hearings in the lower couBail Review (see above), the Appellant seeking bail pending appeal must present the Court with a viable Release Plan, through procedures far more onerous than those governing bail hearings in the lower coubail pending appeal must present the Court with a viable Release Plan, through procedures far more onerous than those governing bail hearings in the lower coubail hearings in the lower courts.

Bail reviews are often conducted in open court after your lawyer convinces the Crown of the need for same.

Through procedures similar to those required for Bail Review (see above), the Appellant seeking bail pending appeal must present the Court with a viable Release PBail Review (see above), the Appellant seeking bail pending appeal must present the Court with a viable Release Pbail pending appeal must present the Court with a viable Release Plan.

The essential task at a Bail Review remains the same as on a Bail Hearing in the lower court: to present the Court with a Release Plan and Sureties that ensures the accused will re-attend court and abide by the conditions impcourt: to present the Court with a Release Plan and Sureties that ensures the accused will re-attend court and abide by the conditions impCourt with a Release Plan and Sureties that ensures the accused will re-attend court and abide by the conditions impcourt and abide by the conditions imposed.

denied, 540 U.S. 825 (2003): In reviewing charges stemming from a pro-prosecution judicial campaign, the Florida Supreme Court upheld the pledge or promise clause, the commit clause, and the clause prohibiting false statements or misrepresentations about an opponent (in this case, giving a misleading account of the incumbent's granting bail in a particular case) of the Florida Code of Judicial Conduct.

Immigration: All aspects of immigration, asylum, nationality and refugee law with particular emphasis and expertise in: asylum and human rights cases; overlap between asylum and extradition law; representing children subject to immigration control; representing victims of trafficking and other vulnerable clients; detention and deportation; immigration issues in adoption and surrogacy cases; immigration for family members of British and settled people; EEA - related matters, in particular relating to third - country national family members; appeal work in FTT and UT and the higher courts; public law challenges to Home Office in judicial review; and immigration bail.

An accused is allowed to seek a review in a higher court if they are not successful in getting out on bail.

In Webb v. City of Maplewood, the appeals court reviewed a court's practice of setting $ 500 bail for traffic ticket cases.

Section 520 clearly envisions more than one opportunity to bring a bail review application and contemplates that different judges of the superior court will sometimes hear these applications.

Prepares for and handles bail review hearings, district court trials, preliminary hearings, violations of probation hearings, sentence review hearings and modification of sentence hearings.

A judge of the Superior Court of Justice may review the bail order (including a detention order) made by another judge of that same cCourt of Justice may review the bail order (including a detention order) made by another judge of that same courtcourt.

There is concurrent jurisdiction in the Superior Court of Justice and the Court of Appeal to conduct a bail review under section 520 of the Criminal Code.

«After a similar court ruling in 2012, lawmakers passed a law making clear that free representation would be available starting with bail review hearings, at which judges review commissioners» decisions.»

While the trio was conducting its review this summer, the Supreme Court issued a decision in R. v. Antic, which clarified the correct approach to bail and called for bail provisions to be applied more consistently and fairly.

R. v. McCallum (N.J.) 2013 ABQB 175 Criminal Law — Compelling appearance, detention and release — Interim release or detention of accused pending trial or appeal — Review In August 2012, the court issued a notice to the profession, setting out, as a pilot project for Edmonton, «Changes to s. 525 Detention Review and s. 520 Bail Review Hearings» under the Criminal Code.

In 2008, Khadr sought bail review again and relied in part on the Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Charkaoui.

R. v. Bowden (J.R.) 2013 ABQB 178 Civil Rights — Trials — Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings — Speedy trial — Accused's right to — What constitutes «within a reasonable time» In August 2012, the court issued a notice to the profession, setting out, as a pilot project for Edmonton, «Changes to s. 525 Detention Review and s. 520 Bail Review Hearings» under the Criminal Code.

The SCC will review whether the appeal court erred in its assessment, given that the respondent was out on bail at the time and still being paid as a teacher under suspension.