I just learned of the existence of a bulletin called Connected, which is published by two US - based organizations, the National Center for State Courts and the Conference of
Court Public Information Officers.
If my judge friends have reached this far, I would recommend that you read the recent report of the Conference of
Court Public Information Officers» New Media Project, and close the door to your chambers, switch your speakers up and enjoy this embedded video from Erik Qualman, with soundtrack by Fatboy Slim.
IDENTIFIER: http://www.ncsc.org/Newsroom/Connected.aspx PUBLISHER: National Center for State Courts and Conference of
Court Public Information Officers.
In 2012, the Conference of
Court Public Information Officers released a nation - wide study where it found that only 1.8 percent of respondents used a blog for court interaction.
These are among the findings of fascinating survey conducted over the summer by the Conference of
Court Public Information Officers.
The bulletin, which covers news about the impact of new social media on courts, is published by the Virginia - based National Center for State Courts and the Conference of
Court Public Information Officers.
The information above comes from a report of the survey written by Norman H. Meyer Jr., clerk of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Mexico, and published in Connected, an e-newsletter on new media and the courts published by the National Center for State Courts and the Conference of
Court Public Information Officers.
While Justice Scalia questions the use of social media, a 2012 national survey of judges by the Conference of
Court Public Information Officers (CCPIO) found that judicial use of social media is on the rise, with more than 46 % of judges saying they use social media.
The bulletin is published by the Virginia - based National Center for State Courts and the Conference of
Court Public Information Officers.
In addition to the Judiciary - Media Committee, other organizations lending support to the project are WBUR, the Conference of
Court Public Information Officers, Boston University College of Communication and the Citizen Media Law Project.
Not exact matches
The former minister said by the date the
court papers by SERAP were purportedly served, she was no longer a
public officer, and therefore could not be subject of a request for production of any documents or
information under the Freedom of
information Act.
Three police
officers disciplined for sex on the job or in
public buildings are now arguing in
court that the
public has no right to know any further
information in the city has, and calling media outlets» attempts to identify them a «witch hunt that is destroying peoples» lives and families.»
Those seeking to cover the
courts using the permitted technology are required to register with the SJC's
Public Information Officer, confirm that they meet the definition of news media and agree to follow the provisions in Rule 1:19.
Before joining the ABA, Ed had served as
public information officer for the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
The mission of the State Law Library is to provide access to legal
information consistent with the research needs and concerns of Montana's
courts, legislature, state
officers and employees, members of the bar of the Supreme
Court of Montana, and members of the general
public.
The
Court's
public information officer currently serves as media liaison, manages the Supreme
Court's webpages, coordinates broadcasts of oral arguments, advises Chief Justices on their
public communications and relations, and serves as communications counsel to the
Court.
In contrast, the
court opined that qualified or conditional privilege applies where one «communicat [es]
information of
public interest to a
public officer or private citizen authorized to take action if the
information is true.»
Employment Screening Resources (ESR) contacted the
Court Executive
Officer by email to ask if there were any errors or additions to be made to the PRRN report in the
Public Record Update Newsletter, or if the
Court wanted to add any
information.
The Tribune reported that
Court Executive
Officer Susan Matherly, citing the California Rules of
Court, was concerned with how case
information in the
Court's database was used by those seeking to sell it, namely
public records researchers working for private background screening firms.
ESR asked the
Court Executive
Officer about the apparent issues concerning
public access of criminal records, if there were any clarifications or comments she had, and if the
information contained in the PRRN Newsletter report was correct (ESR included a URL to the Newsletter report).