Sentences with phrase «court against private schools»

Before that happened, the State Board of Education filed a declaratory judgment action in Wake County Superior Court against private schools, saying that religious schools didn't have a first amendment issue.

Not exact matches

The Urban Youth Collaborative called the bill «an unprecedented step to subsidize private education using the public's money,» noting in its release that according to the Campaign for Fiscal Equity, «New York City schools are owed $ 2.3 billion» under court judgements against the city and state for not providing a minimum adequate education in the public schools.

When state Supreme Court Justice Joseph Teresi of the Third Judicial District retired from his second 14 - year term half way through on June 26, the Albany Democrat and former public defender set up a race that's pitting his fellow Albany Law School alumni, Democratic Albany County legislator and private attorney Justin Corcoran, against Greene County - based Republican Lisa M. Fisher, an attorney with the Ulster County Public Defender's office.

Eight private charter schools are filing suit in State Supreme Court against the New York State Public High School Athletic Association over requirements that make student athletes sit out a season after transferring.

The Arizona Court of Appeals ruled last week that the accounts do not violate state constitutional provisions against using public funds for private or religious schools.

The Kentucky Court of Appeals has upheld a lower - court ruling that dismissed charges of «educational malpractice» against a private scCourt of Appeals has upheld a lower - court ruling that dismissed charges of «educational malpractice» against a private sccourt ruling that dismissed charges of «educational malpractice» against a private school.

The American Federation for Children, the nation's voice for educational choice and its state affiliate, the Louisiana Federation for Children, celebrated a decision from the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in ruling against the U.S. Department of Justice's attempt to regulate and undermine the state's private school choice program, the Louisiana Scholarship Program.

Alabama also enacted tuition grant state laws permitting students to use vouchers at private schools in the mid-1950s, while also enacting nullification statutes against court desegregation mandates and altering its teacher tenure laws to allow the firing of teachers who supported desegregation.50 Alabama's tuition grant laws would also come before the court, with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama declaring in Lee v. Macon County Board of Education vouchers to be «nothing more than a sham established for the purpose of financing with state funds a white school system.&rcourt desegregation mandates and altering its teacher tenure laws to allow the firing of teachers who supported desegregation.50 Alabama's tuition grant laws would also come before the court, with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama declaring in Lee v. Macon County Board of Education vouchers to be «nothing more than a sham established for the purpose of financing with state funds a white school system.&rcourt, with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama declaring in Lee v. Macon County Board of Education vouchers to be «nothing more than a sham established for the purpose of financing with state funds a white school system.&rCourt for the Middle District of Alabama declaring in Lee v. Macon County Board of Education vouchers to be «nothing more than a sham established for the purpose of financing with state funds a white school system.»

A huge victory for Louisiana families as the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled against the U.S. Department of Justice's attempt to regulate and undermine the state's private school choice program, the Louisiana Scholarship Program.

The Minnesota Supreme Court upheld a busing statute allowing private school students to ride on public school buses against a challenge brought under one of Minnesota's Blaine Amendments (Article XIII, Section 2) because the program's primary purpose and effect was neither to benefit nor support religious schools, despite providing incidental and indirect encouragement of private school attendance.

The Colorado Supreme Court upheld the Colorado higher education grant program against a challenge brought under one of its Blaine Amendments (Article IX, Section 7) because the program benefits students, not their schools, because it is available to private as well as public school students, and because it eliminates any danger of indirectly supporting religious missions by attaching statutory conditions on the use of the money.

The Louisiana Supreme Court held that spending tax funds for secular educational services from teachers employed by private schools violated three provisions of the Louisiana Constitution: the prohibition against the enactment of any law respecting an establishment of religion and two Blaine Amendments subsequently repealed in 1973.

Slams DOJ's attempt to undermine Louisiana Scholarship Program The American Federation for Children, the nation's voice for educational choice and its state affiliate, the Louisiana Federation for Children, celebrated a decision from the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in ruling against the U.S. Department of Justice's attempt to regulate and undermine the state's private school -LSB-...]

On March 8, 2013, the Ontario Court of Appeal in the case of Cavanaugh v. Grenville Christian College (2013 ONCA 139) ruled that students, who had allegedly suffered various forms of abuse at a private Anglican school at the hands of its headmasters, had no cause of action against the Anglican Diocese.

CONNECTICUT SUPREME COURT BLESSES $ 42 MILLION FOR TICK BITE Responding to inquiries from a federal appeals court, the Connecticut Supreme Court in August 2017 declared that state law supports a $ 41.7 million jury award in a negligence case against a private school a er a teenaged student was bitten by a tick while hiking in a mountainous area during a study program in CCOURT BLESSES $ 42 MILLION FOR TICK BITE Responding to inquiries from a federal appeals court, the Connecticut Supreme Court in August 2017 declared that state law supports a $ 41.7 million jury award in a negligence case against a private school a er a teenaged student was bitten by a tick while hiking in a mountainous area during a study program in CCOURT BLESSES $ 42 MILLION FOR TICK BITE Responding to inquiries from a federal appeals court, the Connecticut Supreme Court in August 2017 declared that state law supports a $ 41.7 million jury award in a negligence case against a private school a er a teenaged student was bitten by a tick while hiking in a mountainous area during a study program in Ccourt, the Connecticut Supreme Court in August 2017 declared that state law supports a $ 41.7 million jury award in a negligence case against a private school a er a teenaged student was bitten by a tick while hiking in a mountainous area during a study program in Ccourt, the Connecticut Supreme Court in August 2017 declared that state law supports a $ 41.7 million jury award in a negligence case against a private school a er a teenaged student was bitten by a tick while hiking in a mountainous area during a study program in CCourt in August 2017 declared that state law supports a $ 41.7 million jury award in a negligence case against a private school a er a teenaged student was bitten by a tick while hiking in a mountainous area during a study program in CCourt in August 2017 declared that state law supports a $ 41.7 million jury award in a negligence case against a private school a er a teenaged student was bitten by a tick while hiking in a mountainous area during a study program in China.

Responding to inquiries from a federal appeals court, the Connecticut Supreme Court in August 2017 declared that state law supports a $ 41.7 million jury award in a negligence case against a private school after a teenaged student was bitten by a tick while hiking in a mountainous area during a study program in Ccourt, the Connecticut Supreme Court in August 2017 declared that state law supports a $ 41.7 million jury award in a negligence case against a private school after a teenaged student was bitten by a tick while hiking in a mountainous area during a study program in CCourt in August 2017 declared that state law supports a $ 41.7 million jury award in a negligence case against a private school after a teenaged student was bitten by a tick while hiking in a mountainous area during a study program in China.