Sentences with phrase «court at oral argument»

However, his wealth seemed to trouble the Court at oral argument.

Not exact matches

At oral arguments about whether public prayers at a New York town's board meetings are permissible, the high court took a broad look at the country's church - state history and even the Supreme Court's own traditionAt oral arguments about whether public prayers at a New York town's board meetings are permissible, the high court took a broad look at the country's church - state history and even the Supreme Court's own traditionat a New York town's board meetings are permissible, the high court took a broad look at the country's church - state history and even the Supreme Court's own traditcourt took a broad look at the country's church - state history and even the Supreme Court's own traditionat the country's church - state history and even the Supreme Court's own traditCourt's own traditions.

At Wednesday's oral arguments, the court's conservative majority appeared to have the votes to allow the public prayers to continue in some form, but both sides expressed concerns about the level of judicial and government oversight over prayers presented by members of a particular faith.

«This is a huge win for religious liberty,» said Douglas Laycock, a University of Virginia Law School professor who represented the church at the Supreme Court's oral arguments in October.

At 2:15 p.m., Sen. Tony Avella and advocacy groups challenging the «Willets West» mall proposal begin their oral arguments followed by a press conference on the courthouse steps, New York State Supreme Court, 71 Thomas St., Room 210, Manhattan.

At 10:15 a.m., leaders from New York's organized labor movement will hold a news conference as the U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Janus v. AFSCME, the latest in a series of attacks by the wealthy and corporate interests against ordinary working people, outside the Senate lounge, 3rd Floor, state Capitol, Albany.

Also at 1 p.m., the New York Civil Liberties Union presents oral arguments in the Albany County Supreme Court challenging the exclusion of farmworkers from the state labor law that protects employees who organize, Albany County Courthouse, 16 Eagle St., Albany.

At 10 a.m., a Long Island man seeking exoneration after he pleaded guilty as an 18 - year - old in 1988 to sexually abusing boys and served 13 years in prison, Jesse Friedman, attends oral arguments in a state appeals court hearing seeking Nassau County DA and police files in the case; 45 Monroe Pl., Brooklyn.

At the end of the oral arguments, Fisher asked the plaintiffs to submit further written arguments concerning whether they have standing in the case, and on the «political question» — presumably, whether or not this is a matter to be decided by the courts or political system.

The Maine Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Nader v Democratic National Committee on September 14, at 2 p.m..

The Vermont Supreme Court has chosen to hold this oral argument at a university Read more»

The U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in a Rhode Island case that tests the constitutionality of prayers at public school graduation ceremonies.

Josh Dunn, an associate professor of political science at the University of Colorado - Colorado Springs, joins EdNext Editor - in - chief Marty West to discuss the oral arguments heard by the Supreme Court on Monday, February 26, in Janus v. AFSCME.

Josh Dunn, an associate professor of political science at the University of Colorado - Colorado Springs, joins EdNext Editor - in - chief Marty West to discuss the Supreme Court's oral arguments on Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees.

On January 11, while oral argument for Friedrichs v. CTA took place inside the Supreme Court, Rebecca's supporters gathered on the steps to show solidarity and help explain why they think a strong First Amendment is at the heart of a strong education system.

Virginia Rutledge, counsel for The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts (which filed a friend of the court brief in the case), told A.i.A., «The outcome can't be predicted based on questions raised during oral argument, but the Court has before it very compelling arguments for Prince's transformative use of Cariou's imagery and the significance of the First Amendment speech interests at stake, and was openly dismissive of allegations of market harm.&rcourt brief in the case), told A.i.A., «The outcome can't be predicted based on questions raised during oral argument, but the Court has before it very compelling arguments for Prince's transformative use of Cariou's imagery and the significance of the First Amendment speech interests at stake, and was openly dismissive of allegations of market harm.&rCourt has before it very compelling arguments for Prince's transformative use of Cariou's imagery and the significance of the First Amendment speech interests at stake, and was openly dismissive of allegations of market harm.»

Oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit begin at 9:00 am CST in the Warren E. Burger Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse at 316 North Robert Street in St. Paul and will immediately be followed by a press conference on the courthouse steps.

The answer to that question isn't obvious at all; indeed, it's the subject that the Supreme Court took up yesterday at oral argument in KSR International v. Teleflex and covered by Tony Mauro in this article, Justices Slam Nation's Patent System (Law.com, 11/29/06).

In the wake of a New York Times article pointing out that five years have elapsed since the last time Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas spoke at a high court oral argument, legal observers have been weighing in on the significance of this lengthy silCourt Justice Clarence Thomas spoke at a high court oral argument, legal observers have been weighing in on the significance of this lengthy silcourt oral argument, legal observers have been weighing in on the significance of this lengthy silence.

This includes the calendar, «This Week at the Court,» «Upcoming Oral Arguments,» «Upcoming Petitions» and «Term Snapshot.»

LEAF and West Coast LEAF presented oral arguments in Rick v Brandsema at the Supreme Court of Canada on October 14, 2008.

More importantly, Reeve made an important step in skills training: he introduced formal moot courts as a part of the Litchfield curriculum, though on an optional basis.53 Initially, the students themselves conducted the moots, though by 1803, when James Gould was teaching at Litchfield, he presided over the arguments.54 The rules Gould imposed for the moots required not only oral argument, but also written argument, because the litigants had to produce writs and pleadings as well.55 Although a far cry from modern legal writing programs, these moot courts at least endeavored to provide some practical training in the production of persuasive writing.56

We are experienced at briefing and oral argument before the Supreme Court on the merits of cases, and also at the certiorari stage.

Second is today's oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, which «concerns the torture of Ogoni leaders in Nigeria, but at stake is the future of the law under which this case was brought, the Alien Tort Statute.»

She assists them not only with appeals, but also with preparation and oral argument of dispositive or other significant pretrial motions at the trial court level.

Access online the transcript of today's U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N.A., No. 05 - 1342: The transcript can be accessed at this link.

Oral arguments at the New Hampshire Supreme Court will be broadcast live over the Internet starting Wednesday, the court announced tCourt will be broadcast live over the Internet starting Wednesday, the court announced tcourt announced today.

The weekly posts here offer an insider's perspective on oral arguments in major cases at the federal appellate level and news stories about sitting Supreme Court justices.

«Wilmington, DE — 13 March 2003 — A new research - on - demand service that is a searchable data base of oral argument to the court for corporate litigators and corporate counsel will save clients money, speed argument preparation, and improve the litigator's effectiveness, attendees at the 15th Tulane Corporate Law Institute Symposium learned.

You can access at this link the transcript of today's U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in Abramski v. United States, No. 12 - 1493.

Update: You can access at this link the transcript of today's U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in Paroline v. United States, No. 12 - 8561.

He notes that at the oral argument of the case, one of the plaintiffs» lawyers proudly described himself as a «bounty hunter,» to which the court in its opinion remarked, «We will have more to say about exactly who Proposition 65 was created for later, but it wasn't bounty hunters.»

At oral argument, counsel for Cuozzo argued that the PTAB should apply the Phillips claim construction analysis to IPR proceedings for several reasons: 1) BRI only applies when a claim under review may be freely amended; 2) Congress intended the IPR process to be «adjudicatory» rather than «examinational;» and 3) the two different standards would result in anomalies, including situations where claims mean «one thing for patentability in the Board, but a wholly different thing for infringement in the district courts.»

The ruling came as a surprise to many Court watchers given Justice Roberts» hostility to the Voting Rights Act during questioning at oral argument.

When longtime courtroom sketch artist William J. Hennessy Jr. showed up last week at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, supplies in hand, to capture oral arguments in a high - profile Guantanamo detainee case, the court's chief deputy clerk stopped him sCourt of Appeals, supplies in hand, to capture oral arguments in a high - profile Guantanamo detainee case, the court's chief deputy clerk stopped him scourt's chief deputy clerk stopped him short.

Although none of the 2006 term's blockbuster opinions may emerge from the Court's very first oral argument session, it does appear that the 9th Circuit is well on its way to being reversed in at least three of the four cases to be argued in October.

At oral argument you can explain the reasons you think the trial court or agency decision should be changed or kept the same.

Affirmed after oral argument at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Ms. Wydler has developed an effective appellate practice for the firm through incisive brief writing and presenting oral arguments at the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and district courts of appeal in Florida.

After all, if a Supreme Court advocate like Morrison, with twenty oral arguments under his belt and who played a substantial role in researching and drafting the District's 15,000 word brief due at the Court tomorrow is regarded as fungible, what hope is there for the rest of us?

Fortunately, (d) didn't matter, as the appellate court vacated the conviction even though the defense attorney did not appear at oral argument.

At oral argument in that court, they withdrew their objections to these rules, conceding

Access online the transcript of today's U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in Skilling v. United States, No. 08 - 1394: The Court has posted the transcript at this link.

Our study of every oral argument at the Illinois Supreme Court from 2008 through 2016 came to the same conclusion: the larger the margin between your total questions from the Court and your opponent, the less your chance of winning.

The program premiers on Mondays at 9 a.m. on the Ohio Channel and re-airs at various times throughout the week with Supreme Court oral arguments.

Shullman analyzed oral arguments in ten cases at the United States Supreme Court, noting each question asked by the Justices and assigning a score from one to five to each depending on how helpful or hostile she considered the question to be.

Yet another issue will be on display during oral arguments at the Supreme Court next week: whether indigent defendants in capital cases must prove they need more experienced lawyers and resources before they will be provided.

In addition, our database includes data from every oral argument at the Illinois Supreme Court since 2008, and arguments at the California Supreme Court since May 2016, when the Court first started posting video and audio tapes of its sessions.

At the oral argument before this Court, when respondents» counsel was asked whether «this is just a purely Title VII case as it comes to us from the Court of Appeals without any constitutional overtones,» counsel responded:

As Justice Alito suggested at the Cyan oral argument, why would Congress want to bar «a claim in state court under a state cause of action that mirrors the ’33 Act» but then allow «the state court to be able to entertain the real thing, an actual ’33 Act [claim].»