The guide relates that the online materials cited in one Supreme
Court bench opinion were already «deleted before the opinion was published in the U. S. Reports.»
Not exact matches
We can assume that all the Justices sitting on the
Court today, like other humans, have their own preferences and biases about religion, but the judicial
opinions of one of them, Justice John Paul Stevens, raise more than a slight suspicion that some of his actions on the
bench stem from animosity, if not to animal sacrifice, at least to certain less exotic religious beliefs and practices.
While some have suggested that the
Court has reined in its activist tendencies over the years» and there have indeed been heartening signs, such as the elevation of William Rehnquist, a dissenter in Roe v. Wade (1973), to the position of Chief Justice the same year Scalia joined the
bench» Scalia's recent
opinions remind us that these tendencies often prevail.
Challenging the Supreme
Court's order at the African Court on Human and People's Rights in Tanzania, the lawyers of Woyome said: «The contention of the applicant is that following from the earlier concurring opinion to the decision of the review bench, the court can not be said to have been impartial.&r
Court's order at the African
Court on Human and People's Rights in Tanzania, the lawyers of Woyome said: «The contention of the applicant is that following from the earlier concurring opinion to the decision of the review bench, the court can not be said to have been impartial.&r
Court on Human and People's Rights in Tanzania, the lawyers of Woyome said: «The contention of the applicant is that following from the earlier concurring
opinion to the decision of the review
bench, the
court can not be said to have been impartial.&r
court can not be said to have been impartial.»
In October, US Senator John McCain described the Supreme
Court's Citizens United ruling as the
bench's «worst decision ever» — a difficult statement to disagree with, in my
opinion.
Yesterday, in the case of Quebec Superior
Court Justice Michel Girouard — who admitted to meeting regularly with a man later convicted of trafficking — the CJC rejected the majority
opinion of its own inquiry committee to remove the judge from the
bench.
And at her Crossroads blog, Jan Crawford wonders whether Justice Stevens» halting presentation, from the
bench, of his dissenting
opinion is yet another clue that he plans to retire from the
Court.
The book is a «how - to» guide for drafting all types of documents common to trial and appellate
courts, including
bench memos, orders, findings of fact and conclusions of law, jury instructions, statements of reasons for imposing sentence, appellate
opinions, correspondence, and speeches.
The article begins by discussing the clerk's role at the
court, followed by thorough guidance on how to craft the several documents clerks are usually assigned:
bench memos, jury instructions, orders, and
opinions.
Besides teaching the art of
opinion writing, this training would include teaching students how to write
bench memos and the other documents necessary in trial
court clerkships.
But, Toobin points out, Ginsburg took the rare step of articulating her dissent from the
bench (she did not read her dissenting
opinion, but summarized Ledbetter's plight in lay terms) and concluded saying «[t] oday the ball again lies in Congress»
court... [T] he legislature has cause to note and to correct this
court's parsimonious reading of Title VII.»
Other notable tidbits from the case: Justice Thomas, who dissented, read his
opinion from the
bench, the first time he's done so in 15 years on the
court.
The trial
court nevertheless convicted Moseley at a bench trial, the Virginia Court of Appeals wisely reversed for insufficient evidence, but the Virginia Supreme Court in an opinion by the chief judge affirmed his conviction, with but one disse
court nevertheless convicted Moseley at a
bench trial, the Virginia
Court of Appeals wisely reversed for insufficient evidence, but the Virginia Supreme Court in an opinion by the chief judge affirmed his conviction, with but one disse
Court of Appeals wisely reversed for insufficient evidence, but the Virginia Supreme
Court in an opinion by the chief judge affirmed his conviction, with but one disse
Court in an
opinion by the chief judge affirmed his conviction, with but one dissenter.
For an alternative
opinion on this case, see «
Court of Appeal Sends
Court of Queen's
Bench Decision on Pre-Employment Drug Testing to Rehab» by Linda McKay - Panos
There are a wide variety of
courts — state and federal, trial and appellate, specialty — and the work can vary widely as well, but typically, clerks read briefs, attend
court proceedings, write
bench memoranda analyzing parties» arguments, advise the judge on the disposition of a case, and draft
opinions.
Honorable Judge Johnson, U.S.
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Extern, San Francisco, CA, Fall 20XX (forthcoming) Externship will be comprised of researching and writing
bench memos, draft
opinions, and draft orders.