Potential students took part in a free seminar «at which Trump University instructors would recommend signing up for a three - day seminar which cost approximately $ 1,500 at which the instructors would teach certain real estate strategies,» that 2014
court decision states.
An October 2014
court decision states that it started when an entrepreneur named Michael Sexton contacted Trump «with the concept of developing a company that would primarily use technology to provide an instructional curriculum to small business owners and individual entrepreneurs across a broad range of business subjects such as marketing, finance, sales, entrepreneurship and real estate under the «Trump» name and brand.»
The Federal
Court decision states they argued the circumstances were «exceptional» and the adjudicator's order would require BMO to disclose documents «it truly believes are subject to privilege.»
The court decision states: «The three payments to Mr. Shaw have a combined value of $ 475,000.
There are
court decisions stating that the failure to fill a vacancy for an extended period of time violates the constitutional right to representation, and «one - person, one - vote».
Recent
court decisions stated that messages sent by SMS, MMS or instant messaging all had to be included in the discovery process.
Not exact matches
«If a timely agreement can not be reached on a common regulator, the government will propose legislation to carry out its regulatory responsibilities consistent with the
decision rendered by the Supreme
Court of Canada,» the budget
states.
The U.S. Supreme
Court's decision at the beginning of 2015 to accept the case in which a court majority ruled in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow
Court's
decision at the beginning of 2015 to accept the case in which a
court majority ruled in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow
court majority ruled in June that
state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow said.
An appeals
court upheld the decision, and Yelp is now asking the state Supreme Court to revie
court upheld the
decision, and Yelp is now asking the
state Supreme
Court to revie
Court to review it.
In its Vance vs. Ball
State decision Monday, the Supreme
Court curtailed the ability of employees to sue for workplace discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Soon after Daniela Barbosa Assunção de Souza, a judge in Rio de Janeiro
state, told mobile operators to stymie access to the Facebook - owned (fb) messaging app, the chief justice of Brazil's supreme
court suspended her
decision.
Opponents of the
state government's controversial Roe 8 highway extension project have taken their fight to the High
Court following a recent
decision that validated the project's environmental approval.
Perhaps the most politically volatile coming Supreme
Court case is Whole Woman's Health v. Lakey, which will decide whether dozens of abortion clinics throughout Texas can remain open — a
decision that probably will affect other conservative
states that have in recent years imposed harsh restrictions on abortion clinics.
The Virginia residents challenging their
state districting plan said the lower
court ignored a 2015 Supreme Court decision about Alabama in which Justice Anthony Kennedy joined the four more liberal justices to order a review of state legislative distr
court ignored a 2015 Supreme
Court decision about Alabama in which Justice Anthony Kennedy joined the four more liberal justices to order a review of state legislative distr
Court decision about Alabama in which Justice Anthony Kennedy joined the four more liberal justices to order a review of
state legislative districts.
The
decision by Justice Jennifer Schecter of the New York
state court in Manhattan in favor of California restaurateur Summer Zervos, a former contestant on NBC's «The Apprentice,» raises the prospect that Trump might have to answer embarrassing questions in
court about his behavior toward women.
In a
decision released by the Baltimore Circuit
Court, Judge Martin P. Welch wrote that the 35 - year - old was being granted a new trial because his initial council failed to properly cross-examine an expert from the
state about the reliability of cell tower data that seemed to place him at the scene of the crime.
Abortion was legalized in the United
States in 1973, when the Supreme
Court declared that a woman's constitutional right to privacy protected her
decision to end a pregnancy.
Should the
decision end in a draw, the ACA could mean different things in different
states, depending on federal
court of appeals rulings, legal experts say.
(Even though, ironically, they may now marry in many of the same
states, thanks to a Supreme
Court decision from 2012 allowing same sex marriage on a federal level.)
Also cited on the DOJ's explanation of the statute is a
decision from former Supreme
Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft, who wrote, «To conspire to defraud the United
States means primarily to cheat the Government out of property or money.»
The Supreme
Court's Windsor
decision applied to gay marriages only in the 13
states that permitted them at the time.
This
decision probably shouldn't have been a surprise, because it basically said that the
court's 2010
decision in the Citizens United case, upholding the right of corporations to spend money in federal elections, applies to the
states as well.
Meanwhile, a coalition of almost two dozen
state attorneys general is suing the FCC at the U.S.
Court of Appeals, demanding a federal - level rollback of the agency's
decision.
The
decision by the
state's
Court of Appeals is the latest victory for the New York attorney general's office, which has been pursuing the case for 11 years.
This could all add up to a 1990s - style implosion for
states that don't have their own exchanges pending the Supreme
Court's final
decision come June.
A group of 17
states plan to file a lawsuit in federal appeals
court challenging the Trump administration's
decision to declare vehicle emissions rules through 2025 «not appropriate.»
The U.S. Supreme
Court decision that upheld most of Obamacare also rejected the section of the Affordable Care Act that would have compelled
states to expand eligibility in their Medicaid programs to nearly all poor adults.
The 17
states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit in the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging the Environmental Protection Agency's
decision in April to declare U.S. vehicle emissions and fuel efficiency rules through 2025 «not appropriate.»
Election - integrity advocates nationwide are celebrating a
decision by a New York
state appeals
court that classifies electronic ballot images as public records.
«Because Congress did not have a «strong basis of evidence» upon which to conclude that DoD was a passive participant in pervasive, nationwide racial discrimination — at least not on the evidence produced by DoD and relied on by the district
court in this case — the statute fails strict scrutiny,» the
decision stated.
The release also
stated that both FanDuel and DraftKings have agreed to exit the
state and not offer any cash - based contests to Idaho residents absent legislation or a favorable
court decision.
In a terse
decision, Judge Gregory A. Presnell of the United
States District
Court in Orlando rejected the former workers» arguments that Disney and the two contractors had colluded to make false statements when they applied for temporary visas, known as H - 1B, for the foreign replacements.
Zachary Cruz, 18, poses the same threat as his older brother — and his
decision to trespass onto the Stoneman Douglas campus after school Monday is a warning sign that can not be ignored, Assistant
State Attorney Sarahnell Murphy said in
court.
The
court could make its
decision very specific to South Dakota, which would require these other
states to carefully examine their laws to ensure they won't face additional
court challenges.
April 18, 2018 • The
state's summertime ban on the use of a popular weedkiller has dissolved, for now, as a result of
court decisions.
Martinez has appealed South Dakota's
decision to renew an expired Keystone XL permit in the
state's Supreme
Court.
A proactive estate strategy will place you — not
state law or
courts — in control of
decisions about the care of your children, your assets and your health care.
That
court decision opens the door for the Securities and Exchange Commission and
state insurance departments to take over rulemaking.
And in the United
States, there have been significant Supreme
Court decisions concerning intellectual property rights enforcement.
Every
state has statutes dictating where assets will be passed after a person's death, how to handle the
decisions of an incapacitated person, and how the
court will select a person to be in charge of these
decisions.
Mexico's Supreme
Court upholds a law in the
state of Baja California that
states life begins at conception, in a
decision hailed by anti-abortion campaigners.
The gambling world is waiting with bated breath for the United
States Supreme
Court decision that could result in an expansion of sports betting.
A giant wrecking ball still hangs over this construction site, however: the Supreme
Court decision on a 26 -
state constitutional challenge to the health reform.
As a federal
court stated in a 2011 decision upholding the foreign national prohibition statute and regulation — a decision affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court: «It is fundamental to the definition of our national political community that foreign citizens do not have a constitutional right to participate in, and thus may be excluded from, activities of democratic self - government.&r
court stated in a 2011
decision upholding the foreign national prohibition statute and regulation — a
decision affirmed by the U.S. Supreme
Court: «It is fundamental to the definition of our national political community that foreign citizens do not have a constitutional right to participate in, and thus may be excluded from, activities of democratic self - government.&r
Court: «It is fundamental to the definition of our national political community that foreign citizens do not have a constitutional right to participate in, and thus may be excluded from, activities of democratic self - government.»
In Rosenberger v. the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia it reviewed a
decision of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit which had held that though the University (a
state entity) could fund....
I do not yet know what all of Levin's proposed Liberty Amendments are — apparently, there is a new crack at Congressional term limits, which I am iffy about, an amendment for Supreme
Court decisions to be expunged by 60 % of Congress or the
States, which I am very iffy about, one providing Supreme
Court term limits, which I am cool with, one requiring bureaucracy - ordered rule - changes to be subject to Congressional approval when they affect the economy by a certain amount, which I am also.
Diocesan lawyers filed a lawsuit in U.S. District
Court in Hartford May 29 asking that a
decision by the Connecticut Office of
State Ethics determining the Bridgeport Diocese was subject to laws governing lobbying organizations be overturned.
On the question of secularism and the Supreme
Court's
decisions on prayer and other religious activities in the public schools: No doubt these
decisions, which repudiated both history and the wishes of parents and
state legislators alike, played a significant role in the acceleration of what Richard John Neuhaus later dubbed the «naked public square.»
In an important
decision handed down last week, the 10th Circuit
Court of Appeals rebuked Colorado for its handling of a number of
state scholarships programs.
For my good friends at the Georgia Family Council, I wrote a post on a recent
decision by the 11th Circuit
Court of Appeals in Jennifer Keeton's suit against faculty and administrators in the graduate counseling program at Augusta
State University.