Not exact matches
Work on the Lago site near the Thruway between Rochester and Syracuse was halted this summer after an appeals
court faulted the way the town board
determined that the project would have no significant adverse environmental impacts.
Her case will be
determined by the Supreme
Court Judges, one of whom, their President, is the newly appointed Lady Hale; an eminent Family Judge who lent her support to Resolution's campaign to abolish
fault based divorce.
The actual potential value of any personal injury claim that is settled out of
court is
determined by the nature and extent of the accident victim's injuries, the medical expenses, the loss of income, and the pain and suffering that the accident victim endures because of the
fault of another person or business entity.
During your
court hearing, the judge would base his or her decision by
determining what percentage each party is at
fault based on the facts of the accident.
The black box data is now being used in our
courts as evidence to help the
court determine who is at
fault in an accident.
If you can not resolve the case with the at -
fault person's insurance company then a lawsuit is filed with the
court to
determine where the accident happened and what took place.
It is the assigned ICBC adjusters who, in the first instance,
determine fault (and sometimes wrongly I might add) and ultimately the
Courts who will make the final determination of who's at
fault for a motor vehicle accident.
Fault or liability for an accident can be
determined on a percentage basis for instance ICBC or the
Courts may say that a certain driver is 75 %, 50 % or 25 % at
fault f or a motor vehicle accident.
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme
Court considering this section and
determining whether a motorist can be partially at
fault for a crash for failing to have their lights on prior to sunset.
Remember that it won't hurt to speak with a legal professional even if you are undecided that you've a genuine lawsuit or if you're feeling that you may be in part at
fault, we will assist you to
determine if you've got a
court case.
Instead of trying to figure out whose
fault the delay was, the
court determined that cases at the provincial court level shouldn't take longer than 18 months and cases at the Superior Court level shouldn't take longer than 30 months from the time charges were
court determined that cases at the provincial
court level shouldn't take longer than 18 months and cases at the Superior Court level shouldn't take longer than 30 months from the time charges were
court level shouldn't take longer than 18 months and cases at the Superior
Court level shouldn't take longer than 30 months from the time charges were
Court level shouldn't take longer than 30 months from the time charges were laid.
The standard position is that the Claimant should pay the Defendant's costs of the application limited to # 250, however, if a
court determines that a Defendant is at
fault for the Claimant having to needlessly issue the application, then a
court will usually make the Defendant pay the legal costs of # 250, plus the
court issue fee.
As a starting point, you can educate yourself on factors the
court will consider in order to
determine whether the property owner is at
fault.
Where damages have been caused or contributed to by the
fault or neglect of two or more persons, the
court shall
determine the degree in which each of such persons is at
fault or negligent, and, where two or more persons are found at
fault or negligent, they are jointly and severally liable to the person suffering loss or damage for such
fault or negligence, but as between themselves, in the absence of any contract express or implied, each is liable to make contribution and indemnify each other in the degree in which they are respectively found to be at
fault or negligent.
The
Court set out the two questions to ask in
determining whether the
fault component is present:
Preszler Law can help you
determine your legal options for compensation, collect evidence to prove
fault and damages, and represent you in settlement negotiations or in
court.
If the
court finds both the plaintiff and defendant negligent, again depending on location and other factors, the fact finders
determine what percentage of
fault each party is responsible for.
That
court had
determined it would be unreasonable to require a plaintiff to bring no -
fault and negligence claims at the same time.
For example, if the
court or insurer
determines the total damages in a claim are $ 10,000 and finds that you are 20 percent at
fault, the amount of your award will be reduced to $ 8,000.
Alternatively, under a comparative negligence standard, the
court will evaluate the facts of the case and
determine how much
fault both the plaintiff and defendant are for the plaintiff's injury.
For example, if you are seeking $ 100,000 after being hit by another driver, your damages may be capped at $ 75,000 if a
court determines that you were 25 % at
fault because you were speeding.
It will be incumbent upon the
courts to
determine who is at
fault when a driverless car is at play.
Any award of damages is subject to a reduction which the
Court may deem appropriate if it
determines that there was some
fault or negligence on the part of the Plaintiff which caused or contributed to his or her damages.
If you were in any way responsible for your injuries, this may be
determined in
court and the damages you recover will be reduced by the percentage to which the
court finds you at
fault.
If you notice that your brakes aren't responding properly after taking the vehicle to the shop, for example, but then keep driving the car, the
court will likely
determine that the accident was your
fault in addition or in place of the repair shop.
The
courts in turn will then evaluate all the information at hand such as police reports, photographic evidence and other material evidence along with local traffic laws to
determine which party is legally at
fault and liable for the damages.
The
court may
determine that the motorcyclist was 80 % at
fault because he or she was swerving between lanes or speeding.
Before visiting your lawyer, understanding how
courts determine whether a property owner is at
fault can be helpful.
Adding to this site's database of ICBC Unidentified Motorist prosecutions, reasons for judgement were published today by the BC Supreme
Court, Kamloops Registry, finding that the Summary Judgement rule can not be used to
determine if a plaintiff made all reasonable efforts to identify the at
fault driver which is a prerequisite to a successful unidentified motorist prosecution.
Settlement conferences are mandatory in all BC
court registries, except Robson Square in Vancouver, and except for motor vehicle accident cases in which liability is in dispute and a judge is asked to
determine who is at
fault and / or how much money to award the claimant, if any.
The B.C. Supreme
Court had questions whether the widow had actually suffered «duress» in the contract law sense, and
faulted the Board's factual
determined.
Can someone Please make me understand if am going to fight in
court for something that there in insurance all ready
determine that he was at 100 % at
fault...
Especially if the
courts or police
determine it's your
fault.
The insurance company will ordinarily pay the judgment, up to the policy limits, once a
court determines that an uninsured motorist was at
fault.
To
determine who was at
fault, it might have to be
determined by the
courts.
However, long and costly
court battles may be required to
determine who was at
fault in many accidents.
However, it's still possible to make a mistake that the New Jersey
courts will
determine to be your
fault.
In most cases,
courts in California will not consider the
fault of either spouse in
determining the terms of the divorce, including property division, alimony, child custody and child support.
To assist the
Court in
determining fault & compensatory damages, the child (ren) or circumstances are assessed by Dr. Zieman as an expert witness.
If she can't prove this to the
court, the judge will deny the divorce, but she can then refile on no -
fault grounds if she's
determined to end your marriage.
The factors that Texas
courts can consider when
determining what is «just and right» when it comes to property division include who was at
fault in the breakup of the marriage and the disparity of earning power between the spouses.
However, if you and your spouse fail to reach an agreement on property division or spousal support, the
court uses
fault as a
determining factor to resolve those issue.
Some states allow a
fault - based divorce, where the
court determines who is at
fault for the termination of the marriage.
South Dakota
courts are allowed to consider marital
fault in
determining alimony.
While the New Jersey alimony statute includes
fault as a factor in
determining alimony, our state Supreme
Court in 2005 all but eliminated the role of
fault in
determining alimony or the amount of alimony to be paid or received.