Sentences with phrase «court immigration ruling»

Our eclectic mix is rounded out by a look at a recent Supreme Court immigration ruling, a nice blurb from Network Solutions, and yet another reason you shouldn't steal a laptop.

Not exact matches

And some federal court rulings make it difficult for local jails to hold immigrants beyond their criminal sentences or strictly for immigration violations.

And that means several cases important to small business — dealing with issues including health care, immigration, unions, and small business contracting — may leave lower court rulings standing for some time.

What it might mean for entrepreneurs: Immigration policy is one of the country's most divisive issues right now, and the court's ruling underscores how important the debate remains.

Examples abound, but here are two: the Oriental Exclusion Act (1924), which prohibited most immigration from Asia, including foreign - born wives and the children of American citizens of Chinese ancestry; and United States vs. Bhaghat Singh Thind (1923), in which the Supreme Court ruled that Indians from the Asian subcontinent can not become US citizens.

An immigration judge can not quiz asylum seekers on religious doctrine to see if they are credible about their faith, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reiterated in a January ruling.

Chang Qiang Zhu's behavior began to suffer only after the immigration judge asked him specific questions, such as what form of persecution the Apostle Paul used against Christians and what year Paul converted to Christianity, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled.

The memo, which was circulated to prison governors on November 26th, reads: «The criminal casework directorate (CCD) of the Border and Immigration Agency have confirmed to us that as a rule they have no interest in pursuing foreign national prisoners serving sentences of less than 12 months for deportation unless they have a court recommendation for deportation, are already subject to deportation proceedings, or (in the case of non-EEA nationals) were sentenced to less than 12 months but where the current sentence plus one or two previous sentences within the last five years (taking account of the most significant sentences during the period) total 12 months or more.»

Former immigration minister Phil Woolas» re-election to his Oldham East and Saddleworth seat has been declared void, a special election court has ruled.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that people held in immigration detention, sometimes for years, are not entitled to periodic hearings to decide whether they may be released on bail.

Nadhim Zahawi, a leading Brexit supporter and Conservative MP for Stratford - upon - Avon, wrote in the Mail on Sunday that paying a proportion of the UK's annual # 8.5 bn would be worth it for favourable trading arrangements combined with freedom from the EU's immigration rules and the jurisdiction of its courts.

6 p.m., the New York Immigration Coalition and its members, immigrants and allies rally for immigrant New Yorkers in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling, Foley Square, 101 Worth St., Manhattan.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, the newest conservative on the bench at the Supreme Court, sided with its liberal wing on a recent immigration ruling.

The US Supreme Court will consider a legal challenge to President Obama's overhaul of the nation's immigration rules, determining the fate of one of his most far - reaching executive actions.

Scottsdale, Arizona (CNN)- Presumptive GOP nominee Mitt Romney said he wished the Supreme Court had given Arizona «more latitude» in its ruling on the state's controversial immigration law, saying the high court's decision undermined states» rights on the hotly - debated iCourt had given Arizona «more latitude» in its ruling on the state's controversial immigration law, saying the high court's decision undermined states» rights on the hotly - debated icourt's decision undermined states» rights on the hotly - debated issue.

She's someone who can promulgate rules and protocols to be able to stop and bar ICE from our courts,» said Luis Mancheno, Immigration Attorney with Bronx Defenders.

In the months since Scalia's passing, the country's highest bench has split four - four on a number of crucial cases, ranging from immigration to public sector unions — leaving a lower court's ruling in place.

The Court's ruling was criticized by multiple top city officials, as well as leading local immigration reform groups.

The 4 - 4 vote leaves a lower court's ruling in place, ending the plan Obama put into place by executive action after Congress failed, yet again, to pass a comprehensive immigration bill.

In Guitierrez - Brizuela v. Lynch, a 2016 immigration case, Gorsuch waved a red flag against the «Chevron deference» — a doctrine under which courts are supposed to defer to federal agencies on interpretations of rules that developed from a 1984 decision, Chevron v. National Resources Defense Council.

While schools often are required to ask students for proof that they live within a district, school officials essentially are barred from asking about immigration status and can not block a child's access to a public K - 12 school based on such status, under a landmark 1982 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in Plyler v. Doe.

Now, educators and policymakers in that state are scrambling to determine whether and how to enforce the new law, a direct challenge to Plyler v. Doe, a 1982 Supreme Court ruling that asserts that public schools must provide all students an education, regardless of their immigration status.

A story in the June 16, 2010, issue of Education Week about the Arizona law SB 1070 mischaracterized the 1982 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Plyler v. Doe as barring schools from determining students» immigration status because of a potential «chilling» effect on their right to an education.

In the 1982 case Plyler v. Doe, the Supreme Court ruled that students» access to a public education can not be denied based on their immigration status.

A 1982 U.S. Supreme Court ruling guarantees all students the right to kindergarten through 12th grade education regardless of immigration status.

In Trump v. Hawaii, will the Supreme Court rule on whether the September 2017 Presidential Proclamation on immigration violates or likely violates the Establishment Clause of the Constitution?

The Supreme Court ruling further jeopardizes access to the courts, as subjecting individuals to mandatory detention means that an immigration judge does not have the authority to consider an individual's bond case.

Today's first episode covers several topics in the news — the Arizona immigration law, the Supreme Court's animal cruelty ruling and the BP -LSB-...]

Today's first episode covers several topics in the news — the Arizona immigration law, the Supreme Court's animal cruelty ruling and the BP oil spill.

An immigration lawyer can defend your rights and also assist with appeals regarding court rulings.

Translators can be certified as experts in particular cases and many courts have local rules governing the certification of translations for live translation of court proceedings, as the court system of legally obliged to provide translation services to non-English speaking defendants in criminal and immigration cases (and sometimes more broadly).

A similar legal challenge was triggered and heard in Federal Court in January 2013, in relation to the federal government's retroactive application of new immigration rules disqualifying about 280,000 backlog applications that were filed before February 27, 2008.

Almost a year after the Federal Court struck down the health care restrictions to refugees, a second Federal Court judge ruled in Y.Z. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) that restrictions imposed on some refugee claimants to an appeal body called the Refugee Appeal Division violated s. 15 of the Charter.

Notable cases in which Pierre was involved included an appeal against deprivation of citizenship on national security grounds following remittal to SIAC by the Supreme Court in the case of Pham («B2»); an appeal concerning registration under the statelessness provisions of the British Nationality Act 1981 in the case of MK (India); three out of hours applications for injunctions successfully preventing same - day removal and numerous challenges to Home Office policy and the Immigration Rules.

And the Court of Justice of the European Union could build on this clear trend, by ruling that all 28 EU countries now must recognize same - sex marriages from other member states — at least in the context of free movement and immigration.»

What We Do: In 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that criminal defense attorneys have a Sixth Amendment duty to advise their clients about immigration consequences of their criminal cases, and that failure to do so is ineffective assistance of counsel.

Third, the Court's rigid constitutional rule could inadvertently head off more promising ways of addressing the underlying problem — such as statutory or administrative reforms requiring trial judges to inform a defendant on the record that a guilty plea may carry adverse immigration consequences.

As amici point out, «28 states and the District of Columbia have already adopted rules, plea forms, or statutes requiring courts to advise criminal defendants of the possible immigration consequences of their pleas.»

Singh v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWCA Civ 932, [2014] Imm AR 1141 Court of Appeal ruling on human rights factors in deportation under Immigration Rules para. 364.

Donna Martin, Employment and Immigration Partner at one of London's leading mid-tier law firms Mackrell Turner Garrett, has said that the Supreme Court's ruling that employment fees are «unlawful» is likely to affect the courts, employers, employees and the legal profession as a whole.

The case overturns a Court of Appeal ruling which allowed an appeal by AH, IG and NM against the decision of an asylum and immigration tribunal ordering their return to Sudan.

Once the required forms or court order have been supplied, the landlord must generally keep the information confidential and is subject to strict rules about disclosure to other tenants, police, immigration authorities and child welfare agency representatives.