Sentences with phrase «court imposed discipline»

Instead, as in In the Matter of J. Cameron Halford, 392 S.C. 66, 708 S.E. 2d 740 (2011), the Supreme Court imposed discipline on an attorney for depositing a flat fee into a personal account because the attorney stipulated that doing so was a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

He must also file proof of compliance with the court imposing discipline.

The Review Panel has the power to receive special master reports and recommend that the Supreme Court impose discipline.

Through the use of strict time limits, appellate courts impose this discipline on counsel.

Not exact matches

A number of 2015 cases establish that arbitrators, tribunals, and courts will support employers who impose a serious discipline for breaches of workplace safety rules, as long as the employer considers the totality of the factual circumstances.

Given the lawyers» response and their lack of any prior discipline, the court decided to impose the minimum «sit - out» period of 90 days.

While he sees good reasons for justices to draft their own opinions, he questions whether they are sufficient «for Congress to impose such discipline on Supreme Court Justices by cutting off clerk - salary appropriations.»

The court on its own has imposed a higher discipline, so we have seen that trend.

Rai argued before the Court of Appeal on behalf of LSBC that the rule permitting benchers to impose discipline summarily does not violate the Charter.

The B.C. Court of Appeal concluded in The Law Society of British Columbia v. Zoraik, that a bencher panel failed to consider the Charter implications of whether it could impose discipline summarily against Malcolm Hassan Zoraik.

The Supreme Court is responsible for reviewing the board report and case record and imposing discipline.

Of interest is the fact that the Supreme Court of Canada did imply in McKinley v. B.C. Tel26 that an employer might be able to impose a suspension as a lesser form of discipline when the employee's misconduct does not amount to cause for dismissal.

The Supreme Court is responsible for reviewing the Board report, case record, and any objections filed by the parties, and imposing discipline.

A recent decision of Ontario's Divisional Court is important for members of regulatory colleges because it further clarifies what discipline is and how and when it can be imposed on members.

The Code of Judicial Conduct provides that, although such opinions are not per se binding on the Judicial Conduct Board, the Court of Judicial Discipline, or the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, action taken in reliance thereon shall be considered in determining whether discipline should be recommended or imposed.

Upon receipt of a petition filed under subsection 4 of this rule, demonstrating that an attorney has been convicted of a serious crime, the supreme court shall, in addition to suspending the attorney in accordance with the provisions of subsection 7 of this rule, refer the matter to the appropriate disciplinary board for the institution of a hearing before a hearing panel in which the sole issue to be determined shall be the extent of the discipline to be imposed.

The court affirmed the determinations and discipline imposed by the Commission.

Thus, the court affirmed both findings and so upheld the discipline imposed upon the licensees.

A California appellate court has considered a member's challenge to discipline imposed upon him by a REALTOR ® association.

A New Jersey appellate court upheld discipline imposed by a real estate commission on licensees for their role in selling a new home to a second buyer before the underlying transaction had closed.

A Texas appellate court has considered a member's challenge to discipline imposed by a professional association in which the member had voluntarily become a member.

Looking at existing Mississippi law, the court found that while private organizations are generally free to discipline members who violate prescribed rules of conduct, private organizations must also describe possible punishments which can be imposed for various rules violations, in order to alert the member as to the possible punishments when he / she joins the organization and also avoid arbitrary disciplinary actions by the organization against its members.

In addition, the court found that the discipline imposed by the panel conformed to the association's rules, according to the Code of Ethics and Arbitration Manual.

The court ruled that the Association had not followed its own rules in disciplining the Morfs and so had acted arbitrarily, causing the court to vacate the discipline imposed on the Morfs by the Association.