Not exact matches
Malliotakis» plan calls for action
in several categories, including expanded
legal efforts to compel hospitalization via use of «Kendra's Law,» review expiring orders of protection, scrutinize mentally ill inmates before release, expand mental health
courts and psychiatric
capacity of hospitals, support relevant non-profit agencies and greatly expand the number of supportive housing units.
All AMISOM personnel, including locally recruited Somalis, are immune from local
legal processes
in Somalia for any acts they perform
in their official
capacity, Don't you think this is injustice to the victims of sexual violence since perpetrators can't be prosecuted
in Somali
courts or even
in AMISOM run military
courts in Mogadishu.
In addition, in cases where a claimant lacks legal capacity to manage their affairs, the cost of the Deputy's fees after year two should involve a periodical payments order, save in exceptional circumstances, decided by the cour
In addition,
in cases where a claimant lacks legal capacity to manage their affairs, the cost of the Deputy's fees after year two should involve a periodical payments order, save in exceptional circumstances, decided by the cour
in cases where a claimant lacks
legal capacity to manage their affairs, the cost of the Deputy's fees after year two should involve a periodical payments order, save
in exceptional circumstances, decided by the cour
in exceptional circumstances, decided by the
court.
Although each state defines UPL differently, the practice of law is generally recognized to include: (1) accepting cases from a client; (2) setting fees; (3) rendering
legal advice; (4) signing
legal documents; and (5) appearing
in a representative
capacity before a
court or other adjudicatory body.
In this insightful interview, he shares how perceptions towards mental health has changed, aspects the Mental
Capacity Act does not address and how the
Court of Protection has changed to enhance the
legal system.
[
Court - appointed attorney was entitled to absolute immunity from a legal malpractice claim arising from duties that she performed in a quasi-judicial capacity at the request of the co
Court - appointed attorney was entitled to absolute immunity from a
legal malpractice claim arising from duties that she performed
in a quasi-judicial
capacity at the request of the
courtcourt.]
There is a real risk that such a disregard of the separation of powers and the constitutional role and institutional
capacity of the different branches of government could undermine the
legal aid system and cause a lack of public confidence
in judges and the
courts.
Although the
Court of Appeal did not find that Judge Lenehan had erred
in law by stating that «a drunk can consent», his application of the
legal test for a person's
capacity to consent to sexual activity was a
legal error.
What this line of thought illustrates is that SRLs are a challenge not just to
legal process and order
in court (if you'll pardon the pun) but to the economic order of things
in law, and that the economic ramifications of self - representative
capacity reach far beyond the business of law itself.
Similarly, Ontario's Arbitration Act, 1991 allows a
court to refuse to stay proceedings if one of the parties did not have
legal capacity to enter into the contract
in the first place, the arbitration clause is invalid, the subject - matter of the dispute can not be the subject of arbitration under Ontario law, the party seeking the stay engaged
in undue delay, or the matter can be dealt with through default or summary judgment.
In this capacity, Ms. Dillard provided general litigation services to civil litigation clients in both state and federal court, served as general counsel for several small corporations, and assisted with business formation and legal advisemen
In this
capacity, Ms. Dillard provided general litigation services to civil litigation clients
in both state and federal court, served as general counsel for several small corporations, and assisted with business formation and legal advisemen
in both state and federal
court, served as general counsel for several small corporations, and assisted with business formation and
legal advisement.
There is a greater likelihood of maintaining privilege protections
in interviews conducted by outside counsel because they are more likely to be viewed by
courts as conducting an investigation for the primary purpose of providing
legal advice, as opposed to
in - house counsel who often operate
in a business
capacity in their daily functions.
There were also developments for non-means tested
legal aid
in Court of Protection cases under s21A of the Mental
Capacity Act and
in relation to the statutory charge.
This case is also worth a quick read for anyone advancing a claim for loss of earning
capacity (future wage loss) as the
court does a good job summarizing some of the leading
legal precedents
in this area at paragraphs 151 - 155 of the judgment.
Equal Justice Works,
in partnership with Catholic
Legal Immigration Network, Inc. (CLINIC), Kids in Need of Defense (KIND), and the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (USCRI), will receive $ 1.2 million — more than half of the total funding — to deploy 55 full - time Members (45 lawyers and 10 paralegals) to provide legal representation to unaccompanied children, build pro bono capacity to support that population, and increase the effectiveness and efficiency of immigration courts in the locations in which members will s
Legal Immigration Network, Inc. (CLINIC), Kids
in Need of Defense (KIND), and the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (USCRI), will receive $ 1.2 million — more than half of the total funding — to deploy 55 full - time Members (45 lawyers and 10 paralegals) to provide
legal representation to unaccompanied children, build pro bono capacity to support that population, and increase the effectiveness and efficiency of immigration courts in the locations in which members will s
legal representation to unaccompanied children, build pro bono
capacity to support that population, and increase the effectiveness and efficiency of immigration
courts in the locations
in which members will serve.
The
Court relied heavily on guidelines given by the Family Division
in Coventry City Council v C [2013] EWHC 2190 (Fam), where the
Court stated that every social worker must be satisfied that the person giving consent has
capacity to do so, and that even if the person does not lack
capacity that the social worker must be satisfied that the consent is fully informed (meaning that the parent must understand the consequences of giving consent, the range of choices available, the consequences of refusal and of giving consent, and must be
in possession of all the facts and issues material to the giving of consent), fair and proportionate, and where possible parents must obtain
legal advice before consenting.
Moreover, this could also be an appropriate test case for the Supreme
Court to clarify that the principles set out
in National Bank of Canada v. RCIU (the case cited by the hyperbolic Bruce Pardy) do not apply to lawyers, either
in their personal or professional
capacities, and that Lavigne and Green together stand for the principle that not only is there no right «not to associate»
in Canadian law, there is also no right «not to speak» when it comes to lawyers, contrary to the misapprehension of those who are shocked and amazed that the Law Society can require them to adopt a «Statement of Principles» that will, as the supporting
legal opinion points out, make their «generic human rights obligations» more «personal... tangible... and readily accessible.»
In my view this approach gives too much credit to the capacity of courts and the legal system to determine native title claims in a just and equitable manne
In my view this approach gives too much credit to the
capacity of
courts and the
legal system to determine native title claims
in a just and equitable manne
in a just and equitable manner.
[98] While the notion of sovereignty relied on by the
Court prevents the recognition of Indigenous
legal systems and their law - making
capacity after the acquisition of sovereignty, claimants nevertheless have to show
in s223 (1)(a) that the rights and interests which are capable of recognition are possessed under traditional laws acknowledged and traditional customs observed by them.